How will the 2nd 100 days go?
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
Like Wally, it seems that most, if not all, repukeians hate people and want the poor, the disabled and mentally ill to die off. Not just die off but suffer a prolonged and agonizing death. Ya, well, they can all eat sh!t and die as far as I'm concerned. That's right Wally, if you lived in your beloved US of Aggression, they would kill you too, ya senile old fart.
Social Darwinism seems to be directly generating the Republican action plan. I can't see any other rational explanation for it.
I don't think so, I'm not sure of the exact details but I'm 99% sure they said people with passports and people with family in Canada wouldn't have a problem. Whether that is the full extent of the exceptions, I'm not sure!
I think Trump has maneuvered through the tough going and things will get easier from here on!
...Mark this down as a (nuther!)win for Donald Trump...
Trump travel ban injunction partly lifted by top US court - BBC News
(state run television)
oooow, that's gotta hurt
Trump travel ban injunction partly lifted by top US court - BBC News
(state run television)
oooow, that's gotta hurt
Well, considering the odds and opposition he is up against, he is doing well just getting through things on a day by day basis.I am not a deep state fan, so every little victory is appreciated.
It does appear that Trump may have found a few ( aircraft hanger door sized) cracks in their body armor.
btw
it also shows how the leftii judges were being political not judicial
It does appear that Trump may have found a few ( aircraft hanger door sized) cracks in their body armor.
btw
it also shows how the leftii judges were being political not judicial
Last edited:
As if!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eric Trump responds to explosive claims his family 'profited from children's cancer charity' | The Independent
Why didn't you post this story, Cliffy?
Now why on earth would that"hurt" and WHOM does it hurt??...Mark this down as a (nuther!)win for Donald Trump...
Trump travel ban injunction partly lifted by top US court - BBC News
(state run television)
oooow, that's gotta hurt
Do you really think /believe that anyone want the US leader to fail miserably ?? No matter whwo iti s...... A failed gov't is a failed country........and what sane person wants that for any country??
it is tragic that it is al so divisive now and that TRump fosters that kind of divisiveness It is the quality of the leader that is in question....... as well as the sanity of those that voted for him.
If Trump was a democrat........ he would still be a pathetic incompetent leader of government. He bullshitted his way into the oval office and his supporters bought into his BS. IF the voted against Hillary because they hated her........then they did not vote objectively but out of sheer hatred.......( an obnoxious emotion ) and for the best qualified person for the role. If what he is doing is what his supporters want him to do then his supporter like him do NOT want what is best for the country......but only what is best for their personal wallets.
Furthermore : America first.......is the most childish slogan any hone could come up with..........and it is redundant. America HAS been first for yrs now. what seems evident is that simplistic slogans have appeal to a certain mindset
New leaders and countries are emerging in new and more powerful roles. New liaisons are being formed as the US continues with its projectionist ideology .
Fascinating ......
As if!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eric Trump responds to explosive claims his family 'profited from children's cancer charity' | The Independent
Why didn't you post this story, Cliffy?
Perhaps because it aired on the US network with the lowest level of credibility. It appears that Eric inherited his father's propensity for lying.
BREAKING NEWS
CBO: Senate health bill would leave 22 million more people uninsured by 2026
Evening Edition from The Washington Post
CBO: Senate health bill would leave 22 million more people uninsured by 2026
Evening Edition from The Washington Post
You do know that every charity in the whole of the US id geared to giving 90% of the donations to the rich right? Why is this being pumped up as if it was the only incident that gets any attention. I could post lots of links but check on the Red Cross because you know damn well that if they are doing it then they all are. Top of the scumbag heap, by far, is the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.propublica.org/article/red-cross-ceo-has-been-misleading-about-donations
The American Red Cross regularly touts how responsible it is with donors' money. "We're very proud of the fact that 91 cents of every dollar that's donated goes to our services," Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern said in a speech in Baltimore last year. "That's world class, obviously."
McGovern has often repeated that figure, which has also appeared on the charity's website. "I'm really proud" that overhead expenses are so low, she told a Cleveland audience in June.
The problem with that number: It isn't true.
After inquiries by ProPublica and NPR, the Red Cross removed the statement from its website. The Red Cross said the claim was not "as clear as it could have been, and we are clarifying the language."
The Red Cross declined repeated requests to say the actual percentage of donor dollars going to humanitarian services.
But the charity's own financial statements show that overhead expenses are significantly more than what McGovern and other Red Cross officials have claimed.
In recent years, the Red Cross' fundraising expenses alone have been as high as 26 cents of every donated dollar, nearly three times the nine cents in overhead claimed by McGovern. In the past five years, fundraising expenses have averaged 17 cents per donated dollar.
But even that understates matters. Once donated dollars are in Red Cross hands, the charity spends additional money on "management and general" expenses, which includes things like back office accounting. That means the portion of donated dollars going to overhead is even higher.
Just how high is impossible to know because the Red Cross doesn't break down its spending on overhead and declined ProPublica and NPR's request to do so.
The difference between the real number and the one the Red Cross has been repeating "would be very stark," says Daniel Borochoff of the watchdog group CharityWatch. "They don't want to be embarrassed."
If you can't afford health care premiums based on maximum profits for the insurer, you should die a miserable death.
The things that JLM misunderstands would fill all the libraries on the planet.
The Court said that people who have a bona fide relationship with a person or institution in the U.S. can still come, as visitors or refugees. Trump can exclude those who do not have such a bona fide relationship. The Court did not decide the merits of the case. It will do that, or not, in October.
As if!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eric Trump responds to explosive claims his family 'profited from children's cancer charity' | The Independent
Why didn't you post this story, Cliffy?
Cliffy is a good lamb and prefers the Fake News fed to him.
^
Fake
FACT...
28 Million are uninsured now with Obamacare as the law of the land.
*snicker*
Last edited:
