How the GW myth is perpetuated
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
Yeah.....between the two of them they might be able to rustle up an IQ in the three digit range.....maybe.
always felt he needed to get something off his chest. maybe using 40 grit sandpaper?
JunkScience.com @JunkScience New White House climate führer — with NO BACKGROUND IN SCIENCE — wastes no time attacking skeptics.
hockey schtick @hockeyschtick1 Al 'I pooped my pants' Roker claims (with no scientific evidence) that this year's harsh record-cold winter due to global warming
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6746786?ir=Green&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000048 …
http://t.co/g926YXa8Xz
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6746786?ir=Green&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000048 …
http://t.co/g926YXa8Xz
hockey schtick @hockeyschtick1 Al 'I pooped my pants' Roker claims (with no scientific evidence) that this year's harsh record-cold winter due to global warming
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6746786?ir=Green&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000048 …
http://t.co/g926YXa8Xz
That's the worst fake n' bake tan ever.
hot damn, Locutus... you're on a real C&P roll! Are you just fishing here or do you mean this one? :mrgreen:
oh wait, just a while ago you put up an article link targeting MIT scientist Emanuel in regards disclosure of his 2 board positions... but Locutus, if this is you now being "equal opportunity", your linked article seems a tad skewed and a little concerned about other efforts to determine possible funding/disclosure "lapses". Locutus, do you have a concern that those seven persons, each with varying degrees of impact on policy in the scientific community, should have their positions weighted and measured against possible external influences... particularly when they're such repeated go-to's for Republicans calling them to give U.S. Congressional testimonies? What's the problem, hey Locutus?
fuhrer??? Oh my, Locutus!
that would be the site founded by long-time Fox News columnist 'Steven Milloy', right Locutus? Ya baby, you're on C&P roll! Hey Locutus... what's Milloy's background... in science? :mrgreen:
While a smear campaign rages in the media and at the Congressional level, Russell Cook takes a look at its roots
“Regurgitate Unsupportable Accusations, We Much?” Kert Davies is Back. Again.
A brief word of explanation about the first part of that title, it’s a variation of the “Resist, we much” teleprompter reading gaffe by the Reverend Al Sharpton, where he meant to say “Resist, we must” on his TV show. It lends itself to a variety of other overblown political situations which beg for a “Sharptonism” parody. The latest instances where Boston Globe, New York Times, and Washington Post articles cited Kert Davies’ supposedly damaging documents (screencaptures here, here and here), in an effort to trash skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon, invites exactly that kind of parody.
Funny how none of those publications bothers to mention (hiding appearances of bias, we much?) Davies’ former position as Greenpeace’s Research Director.
more
Greenpeace: The roots of Climate Smear | Watts Up With That?
“Regurgitate Unsupportable Accusations, We Much?” Kert Davies is Back. Again.
A brief word of explanation about the first part of that title, it’s a variation of the “Resist, we much” teleprompter reading gaffe by the Reverend Al Sharpton, where he meant to say “Resist, we must” on his TV show. It lends itself to a variety of other overblown political situations which beg for a “Sharptonism” parody. The latest instances where Boston Globe, New York Times, and Washington Post articles cited Kert Davies’ supposedly damaging documents (screencaptures here, here and here), in an effort to trash skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon, invites exactly that kind of parody.
Funny how none of those publications bothers to mention (hiding appearances of bias, we much?) Davies’ former position as Greenpeace’s Research Director.
more
Greenpeace: The roots of Climate Smear | Watts Up With That?
"99+% of all climate funding goes to alarmists rather than skeptics"
On Funding and Bias in Climate | Coyote Blog
On Funding and Bias in Climate | Coyote Blog
oh my, Locutus! Isn't skepticism at the heart of all science? Is this "Coyote Blogger" guy of yours suggesting that if you're not a skeptic... you're "an alarmist"? But what does that mean Locutus... what does that label "alarmist" mean? Notwithstanding it appears your Coyote guy doesn't bother to identify the source of his figure - go figure, hey Locutus?
Locutus... just what is an alarmist? C'mon, step-up, out and beyond your banal C&P routine. What's an alarmist, Locutus?
Global warming research: strong storms to become stronger, weak storms to become weaker
Global warming research: strong storms to become stronger, weak storms to become weaker | Watts Up With That?
Global warming research: strong storms to become stronger, weak storms to become weaker | Watts Up With That?
Climate Realists @ClimateRealists Paul Homewood: The Met Office & The Pause....and look what happens when you apply SCIENCE
The Met Office & The Pause
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/the-met-office-the-pause/
The Met Office & The Pause
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/the-met-office-the-pause/
Onward Climate Soldiers
By EBD on March 4, 2015 12:01 AM | 3 Comments
Three years ago the thin-skinned wizard of Penn State let everyone in the world know in the clearest possible terms that his version of climate science is not a process of discovery based on research and new information, but a proselytizing mission:
Why is his work still being cited by warmists? When a scientist who touts an unproven theory denounces as heretical those who continue to do honest research, no scientist, regardless of his views, should ever take him seriously.
Climate scientists accuse Democrat of McCarthyism - Watchdog.org
By EBD on March 4, 2015 12:01 AM | 3 Comments
Three years ago the thin-skinned wizard of Penn State let everyone in the world know in the clearest possible terms that his version of climate science is not a process of discovery based on research and new information, but a proselytizing mission:
Climate scientist Michael Mann, who has appeared at political events supporting candidates calling for the U.S. government to act more forcefully, said in 2011, "I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don't know what she thinks she's doing, but it's not helping the cause."
(emph. mine)Why is his work still being cited by warmists? When a scientist who touts an unproven theory denounces as heretical those who continue to do honest research, no scientist, regardless of his views, should ever take him seriously.
Climate scientists accuse Democrat of McCarthyism - Watchdog.org