How socialism turned oil-rich Venezuela into a basket case

Glacier

Electoral Member
Apr 24, 2015
360
0
16
Okanagan



Life isn’t much fun these days in the world’s socialist paradise. If you had to choose a country you didn’t want to live in, Venezuela would be near the top of the list. Corrupt, dysfunctional, bankrupt, crime-ridden, drug-infested, short of practically every basic commodity, it can’t keep the lights on, keep the government running or brew its own beer. Last weekend six army officers were arrested for stealing goats from a farm because they were hungry.


Venezuela has become the basket case of the western hemisphere, a case study on how not to run a country and a living example of what happens when a left-wing government is let loose with utopian economics. The cruel irony is that Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves — 298 billion barrels —the raw material on which to build a pleasant and prosperous nation. Yet it recently began importing oil from the U.S., a country it has spent a decade deriding as a mortal enemy.





It’s a bitter fate for those who must endure it, but a telling one for anybody tempted to embrace the illusory idealism of left-wing economic theory. Seventeen years ago Hugo Chavez came to power armed with vast oil resources and a populist program based on redistribution of wealth from the richest to the poorest.


Chavez died three years ago, having brought the country to the brink of collapse while steadily increasing his own dictatorial powers. The self-proclaimed defender of the masses, a student of Karl Marx and admirer of Fidel Castro (and personal favourite of Naomi Klein), Chavez ended up an ally of Iraq, Iran and Libya and an implacable foe of the U.S., which he accused of backing a coup aimed at removing him from office.


While the country skidded towards penury, his daughter, Maria Gabriela, amassed a fortune valued at $4.2 billion, safely spirited away in foreign banks.







During his years in power he was championed by people like Klein on the radical left for his proclaimed attachment to the poor and disadvantaged. But his government’s economic schemes only managed to empty the treasury while frightening away foreign firms and drying up investment. He seized assets without compensation, nationalized foreign firms, and set off an exodus of scientists, doctors, entrepreneurs and others, who took their drive, education and skills with them. He fired 19,000 people from the national oil company, even though oil exports produced 95% of foreign earnings. Chavez used the money to subsidize everything from schools to health clinics to gasoline, which was great while it lasted, but when revenue from oil exports began to dry up Chavez’s successors were forced into draconian cuts to supplies and services that become harsher by the week.







Now the country is among the most violent and crime-ridden in the world. Shopping malls, grocery stores and food trucks are targets of mass looting attacks. Four-hour blackouts are a daily occurrence, and the government recently put public employees on a two-day work week to save energy. (Electrical, not theirs). Schools operate on a four-day week. Many people use the empty days to stand in line for food. A fingerprint system is employed to enforce rationing. Diapers, car parts and medicine are scarce, the biggest beer company announced it will shut down for lack of foreign exchange to buy imported barley, and inflation is so out-of-control the government can’t afford the cost of repeatedly printing up new bills.








Venezuelans are understandably tired of the socialist miracle. In a December election, the ruling party lost control of the legislative assembly for the first time since 1999. A petition to force the recall of President Nicolas Maduro has garnered almost two million signatures, more than nine times the required number. The signatures are to be validated and a ruling on whether the refendum can proceed is due next week. But Maduro is unlikely to go easily, and the government already claims efforts to oust it are part of a vast right-wing conspiracy. If the referendum isn’t held by the end of this year, power would shift to Maduro’s vice-president.


Appalled by the level of the crisis, Pope Francis recently wrote a personal letter to Maduro lamenting the impact on Venezuela’s 30 million people. Contents of the letter were not disclosed, but prayer may be all the hope left for a country that was supposed to be saved by socialism.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Ain't socialism grand? And to think there are people that want to do the same to Canada.
Yeah, and funny enough, many of them work for the CIA and the mega banks
http://www.globalresearch.ca/cia-and-fbi-plan-to-assassinate-hugo-ch-vez/1296
"MASS UPRISING DEFEATS CIA COUP IN VENEZUELA"
http://iacenter.org/Venezuela/venez_uprising.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/03/w...ia-knew-of-a-coup-plot-in-venezuela.html?_r=0
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/21/usa.venezuela

canada has oil too
 
Last edited:

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,966
547
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
The funny part of this is that Venezuela was a basket case long before the advent of socialism and it was inconceivable to most people that things could actually get worse.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
A economic system only works if the majority of the global population is willing to support it. If you lose the very rich's, intrest to make a system work right off the bat, you won't be getting very far.

Capitalism has its problems too. The willingness of the rich to support it, helps it from turning into a basket case itself.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Oddly enough, the same thing was said about Harris' Ontario

A system is only as good as the will to keep it working. There is no difference between the socialism, slavery, Serfdom, or capitalism, systems we have experienced on earth.

Everything falls on the willingness of all to support it.

Without support all systems will fail equally.

The flaw of socialism is rich individuals tend to lose intrest of supporting it.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Any internal opposition or external opposition of a system will hinder that system.

Without opposition from the United States Russia and China have done very well under socialist systems.

It's the same with the value of currency. Currency only has value based on how many people thinks it has value. A economic system is the same. It works based on how many people support it to make it work. All opposition to the value of a currency devalues it.

If everyone including the rich dedicate thenselves to making a system work, it will work.

It amazes me that people have a hard time grasping such a simple consept.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The funny part of this is that Venezuela was a basket case long before the advent of socialism and it was inconceivable to most people that things could actually get worse.
You must mean the graduates of this school that is run by pricks, American pricks to be specific. Create a designed chaos through the installed government or acts to destabilize a government that is to be overthrown and call them 'inept' when they appear to be losing the fight.

If you want to see how Venezuela was before Hugo all you have to do is look at the whole of South America being run by the same pricks from the US that ran Iran from 1953-1979. The clowns that don't know that history if driving events today are just that, clowns without a clue.

Notorious Graduates | SOA Watch: Close the School of the Americas
Venezuela

Name: Army Commander in Chief Efrain Vasquez and General Ramirez Poveda
Country: Venezuela
Dates/courses: Attended the SOA in 1988; 1972
Info: Both Vasquez and Poveda helped to lead a failed coup in Venezuela in April of 2002, despite supposedly receiving training at the SOA that encourages respect for democracy and civilian governments. Otto Reich, then Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, shared his support for the coup and a new government, and in the same year was appointed as a WHINSEC Board of Visitor member to “oversee” democracy and human rights curriculum, as well as operations at the school. Reich met with these SOA graduates prior to the coup and advised business leader Pedro Carmona, who subsequently seized the presidency.

Name: General Ramon Davila Guillen
Country: Venezuela
Dates/courses: Attended the SOA in 1967 for Irregular Warfare training
Info: General Guillen was indicted in November 1996 in connection with a shipment of one ton of cocaine into Miami in 1990, which he says was authorized by the CIA in an effort to catch drug dealers. In 1993, the CIA called the shipment "a regrettable incident" and dismissed the CIA agent involved. (CAP, 9/21/97)

If everyone including the rich dedicate thenselves to making a system work, it will work.
The rich have imposed a dividing line to restrict just how 'enlightened' they will allow the '3rd world' to be. Recents events in the past seem to indicate that once the 'public' has access to university level of education the role of a dictator government is no longer tolerated and if it isn't voted out it is overthrown by the same university students. The exception to the rule would be the 'private school' establishments as they are for the brainwashing of the 'elite' alone. That racket should be exposed for what it is, a sham that has made university education so expensive in this area (North America) that nobody but the elite can make use of the education in the first place (1% of all graduates work in the field they studied in and that is restricted to the elite) Dump that expense on them alone and watch the price fall to what it should have been all alone. (same with oil, this is not the basement price, it is the normal price and the $100/bbl was inflated to maximize the profits for the 1% alone)
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,029
3,817
113
Edmonton
I suppose stating that Russia and China are "doing well" under socialism is an opinion that some people hold. However, I'm wondering if one was to actually speak to the people who live and work there who are educated enough to know about other "systems" (i.e. not brainwashed into thinking their system is nirvana), would agree.


Just askin....
 

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,801
465
83
Penticton, BC
I suppose stating that Russia and China are "doing well" under socialism is an opinion that some people hold. However, I'm wondering if one was to actually speak to the people who live and work there who are educated enough to know about other "systems" (i.e. not brainwashed into thinking their system is nirvana), would agree.


Just askin....

I wonder about that. Both Russian and China have made significant strides towards the capitalism end of the spectrum in the last couple of decades. I wonder what that has done for rank and file citizens. It's obvious that it has given rise to a new class of economic elite, but I have to wonder how much of that has trickled down so to speak.

Isn't it obvious that Venezuela's plight is the result of corruption and bad management as opposed to socialist philosophy? One needn't look any further that the Nordic countries to see successful examples of socialist governing. On a global scale, Canada is considered a socialist country by comparison. What aspects of Canadian government should we rid ourselves of in the name of moving to the political right?
 
Last edited:

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,966
547
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Isn't it obvious that Venezuela's plight is the result of corruption and bad management as opposed to socialist philosophy? One needn't look any further that the Nordic countries to see successful examples of socialist governing. On a global scale, Canada is considered a socialist country by comparison. What aspects of Canadian government should we rid ourselves of in the name of moving to the political right?

Venezuela is a good example of what happens when their is no accountability.

Capitalism has enjoyed more success because of the inbuilt accountability it has naturally imbedded in its system.

Not to say it's perfect, but it is more competitive.

If you could devise a way to have the same accountability in a socialist system then you would enjoy relatively the same success. Like a co-op owned company owned by all its workers.
 
Last edited: