there are over 50,000 men at Fort Hood - so 5% would be 2,500
so a mere 2,500 armed soldiers at any one time.
congratulations! You know Math!
there are over 50,000 men at Fort Hood - so 5% would be 2,500
so a mere 2,500 armed soldiers at any one time.
while hoid fuccks around with a plastic handgun, his neighbor is doing this:
We have a 3D printer. I think that I'll get my son to print one up. I don't have the nerve to fire it, though. I'm very attached to my fingers, hands, eye balls, etc.
First off, there are over 50,000 SOLDIERS at Fort Hood.there are over 50,000 men at Fort Hood - so 5% would be 2,500
OK, let me revise my estimate. Downward. Make it 1%.so a mere 2,500 armed soldiers at any one time.
Any ammo? I do hope you realize that without ammo, an assault rifle is a not-particularly-effective club.The last time I was on a US army base and ate at the mess there were probably 1,000 assault rifles left outside under guard while the troops ate.
So I know without question that there are oodles if not shit loads of weapons on any army base at any given time.
I cannot offhand think of any other place than here where this would even be under consideration.
The presence of guns does not preclude a terrorist attack - be it a police station or an army base.
While I'm adamantly opposed to interfering with responsible owners having guns, I am just as adamantly opposed to this recent process of 3 D printing plastic guns. No bonafide gun lover would want one and they would only be used for nefarious activities! What say you Colpy?
I have no use for a plastic handgun.
I'm not a terrorist or a criminal.
We have the tech for a firearm to only function while in the hands of the register owner. I have no issue with being a "from here on in" scenario but giving up transgenerational iron in the gun safe just ain't gonna happen.They don't seem to be much good yet, but technology marches forward, and they will get better.
And it is impossible to keep the genie in the bottle.
People forget that even modern firearms are basically 19th century technology.
The gun I carried as a service revolver was patented in 1899. (S&W M&P .38 Special)
What many consider the best combat handgun around, used by elite police tactical units, was patented in 1905. (Colt 1911)
The first semi auto centrefire sporting rifle went on sale in 1903. (Remington Model 8)
I am not thrilled by the development, but it will make "gun control" a farce, and sensible people would refocus on people control, i.e, licensing. Basically, it will make trying to control guns a complete waste of time........and only laws against unlicensed possession a sane alternative to classification and restricted access.
That's not necessarily a bad thing.
In other words, I'm divided on the subject.
Since you derailed the books are still audited but away from the band members and taxpayers fingertips, we are told that the bands review the income statements at their annual meetings with the rest of the band and it is none of the taxpayers business what the money is being spent on.
in other words the NRA has said shit on this issue and you don't know what to think about it until they tell you what to think about it.They don't seem to be much good yet, but technology marches forward, and they will get better.
And it is impossible to keep the genie in the bottle.
People forget that even modern firearms are basically 19th century technology.
The gun I carried as a service revolver was patented in 1899. (S&W M&P .38 Special)
What many consider the best combat handgun around, used by elite police tactical units, was patented in 1905. (Colt 1911)
The first semi auto centrefire sporting rifle went on sale in 1903. (Remington Model 8)
I am not thrilled by the development, but it will make "gun control" a farce, and sensible people would refocus on people control, i.e, licensing. Basically, it will make trying to control guns a complete waste of time........and only laws against unlicensed possession a sane alternative to classification and restricted access.
That's not necessarily a bad thing.
In other words, I'm divided on the subject.
your deeply emotional attachment to you guns is touching. And you are correct that if everyone loved their guns as you do things would be fine.I started hunting when I was 10 yrs old. I took the hunter's training course before I was 16. Firearms safety through cadets, federal firearms safety twice since 1990. I have the highest respect for human life, police and the law. Frankly if there were more people like me, we wouldn't have a problem with firearms.
I do not expect the anti-gun crowd to ever get that through their thick skulls.
Just quit arguing with the fool....those anti gun global warmists have swallowed their propaganda and you'll never change their mind!I started hunting when I was 10 yrs old. I took the hunter's training course before I was 16. Firearms safety through cadets, federal firearms safety twice since 1990. I have the highest respect for human life, police and the law. Frankly if there were more people like me, we wouldn't have a problem with firearms.
I do not expect the anti-gun crowd to ever get that through their thick skulls.
in other words the NRA has said shit on this issue and you don't know what to think about it until they tell you what to think about it.
I am increasingly impressed by the depth of your stupidity.
The NRA is an American institution.
I'm a 7th generation Canadian.
The NRA has a fit over the idea of universal background checks, and would fight the revolution over any licensing requirement...........I think background checks, training and subsequent licensing are the way to go.
Try to get that through you thick head, then maybe I will educate you further, if possible.
This is where I will disagree. IMO, whenever a seemingly good idea has been put into practise, there is a responsibility to track and evaluate how effective it has been at changing the problem that it is supposed to solve.
until the antigun crowd can actually prove that all these added bureaucracies are effective, I think the policies should be reviewed and ultimately the restrictions in our freedoms should be repealed.
In other words, make things better or **** off.
lets face it, 30 years of canadian gun control needs to be repealed if it hasn't stopped 1 bullet