Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Then, there's the mass shooting at army bases:
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/army-major-kills-13-people-in-fort-hood-shooting-spree
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...oting-attacks-military-bases-history/7225403/
Lots and lots more guns would have prevented those!
there is nothing funny about that. how can you be such a worthless pos of a human being?
Hell is where you are persecuted with no opportunity to defend yourself.
Soldiers are not allowed to carry weapons on base.
. . . and for the adults in the room. If you can't trust the KGB who can you trust? . . . Comrade.
Former KGB Agent Yuri Bezmenov Explains How to Brainwash a Natio
The laughter is not about the shootings of police officers, it is at ignorant people who think only unarmed and untrained people get shot and killed!! or the proliferation of guns has nothing to do with the deaths of thousand upon thousands of humans every single minute of every single day. All to satisfy an imaginary self-image......in other words EGO!! or GREED depending on the person!!
Military personnel are not allowed to carry weapons on base.
https://taskandpurpose.com/shouldnt-soldiers-carry-guns-military-bases/
No retard. Military pers. are not armed on base unless they are on guard duty or some other specific event.
LIE-berals DELIBERATELY misrepresent and misinform us on so many issues- for their own convenience that it is hard to keep anything they say straight!!!!
But not to worry- some people CAN cut through the LIE-beral bafflegab!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Consider:
Here is an article scorning the Fake News LIE-berals so enjoy spouting about racial issues. With some comments of my own in brackets):
'Discrimination and Disparities' review
Walter E. Williams, Special to Postmedia Network. Published: April 3, 2018.
Updated: April 3, 2018 7:52 AM EDT
Filed Under: Toronto SUN/ Opinion/ Columnists
Related
Editorials
EDITORIAL: Let's reverse jobs grant attestation for next year
Columnists
GOLDSTEIN: Liberal climate crusaders exposed
Columnists
FUREY: Canada gearing up for a carbon tax showdown
News
AGAR: Transit lessons we could learn from Chicago
"Discrimination and Disparities" by Thomas Sowell.
I don’t mind saying that this column represents a grossly understated review of Discrimination and Disparities, just published by my longtime friend and colleague Dr. Thomas Sowell. In less than 200 pages, Sowell lays waste to myth after myth not only in the United States but around the globe.
One of those myths is that but for the fact of discrimination, we’d all be proportionately represented in socioeconomic characteristics, such as career, income, education and incarceration. The fact of business is that there is no evidence anywhere on Earth, at any time in human history, that demonstrates that but for discrimination, there would be proportionate representation in anything by race, sex, nationality or any other human characteristic. Sowell shows that socioeconomic outcomes differ vastly among individuals, groups and nations in ways that cannot be explained by any one factor, whether it’s genetics, discrimination or some kind of exploitation.
(Certainly it would be nice if we all got the jobs we wanted and led the lives we aspired to but some people do have crap attitudes that dictate that succeeding in school means selling out to white people and should therefore be AVOIDED!!! Cdn natives for instance, suffer badly from unemployment as they live in a country where over 75 percent of jobs require post secondary education yet only 25 percent of natives graduate from high school. Apparently natives are so lacking in education and thus ignorant of reality they cannot see the problem related to their unemployable status?)
A study of National Merit Scholarship finalists shows that firstborns are finalists more often than their multiple siblings combined. Data from the U.S., Germany and Britain show that the average IQ of firstborns is higher than the average IQ of their later siblings. Such outcomes challenge those who believe that heredity or one’s environment is the dominant factor in one’s academic performance. Moreover, the finding shows that if there is not equality among people born to the same parents and living under the same roof, why should equality of outcomes be expected under other conditions?
(Equality of outcome is a sales pitch offered by LIE-berals who have convinced some gullible voters that a free lunch can be theirs if only they support LIE-berals! It is reasonable that govt should ensure fair play and honest dealing but LIE-berals want to manipulate us far beyond anything that is fair or logical and they do so for the most selfish of reasons- to buy votes and cling to power at any price- and they are prepared top discriminate as viciously as Soviet Commissars to get their way!)
In Chapter 2, Sowell provides evidence that people won’t take racial discrimination at any cost. The higher its cost the less it will be tolerated, and vice versa. One example is segregated seating on municipal transit in the South. Many companies were privately owned, and their decision-makers understood that they could lose profits by offending their black customers by establishing segregated seating. Transportation companies fought against laws mandating racially segregated seating, both politically and in the courts, but lost. Companies even chose to ignore the law. Faced with heavy fines, though, they began to comply with the law.
(LIE-beral support for affirmative action on behalf of select voters who are expected to vote LIE-beral in exchange for preferential treatment will be no more successful! One has only to look at the level of hostility developing among Cdns who are disgusted with LIE-beral favouritism towards radical Muslims and the assorted illegals swarming across our borders in response to LIE-beral invitation! Further, there is growing disgust as LIE-beral oriented universities select new employees based on race rather than real qualifications!)
The point is that the difference between the white transportation owners and the white politicians and segregationists was the transportation company owners had to bear the cost of alienating black riders and the politicians and segregationists didn’t. Sowell broadens his analysis to show that regulated companies and organizations — such as public utilities and nonprofit entities, including colleges and government agencies — will be at the forefront when it’s politically popular to discriminate against blacks but also will be at the forefront when it’s politically popular to discriminate in favour of blacks. Why? Because in either case, they don’t bear the burden of forgone profits.
(Sowell neatly sums up the LIE-beral value system!!!! As somebody once observed: “a LIE-beral is a person who will give away everything that he does not own!)
In Sowell’s chapter titled, “The World of Numbers,” he points out what I’m going to call out-and-out dishonesty. In 2000, a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights study pointed out that 44.6% of black applicants were turned down for mortgages, while only 22.3% of whites were turned down. These and similar statistics led to charges of lending industry discrimination and demands that government do something about it. While the loan rejection rate for whites was 22.3%, that for Asians and native Hawaiians was only 12.4%. Those statistics didn’t see the light of day. Why? They didn’t fit the racial discrimination narrative. It would have been difficult for the race hustlers to convince the nation that lending institutions were discriminating against not only black applicants but white applicants, as well, in favour of Asian and native Hawaiian applicants.
(No wonder the full set of numbers are not published! LIE-berals are justifiably infamous for their cherry picking of facts and Fake News!)
At several points in the book, Sowell points to the tragedies created in the pursuit of social justice. He gives the example of the Gujaratis expelled from Uganda and the Cubans fleeing Cuba. Many of the Gujaratis arrived in Britain destitute but rose again to prosperity. It’s the same story with the Cubans who came to the U.S. and prospered. By losing their most productive people, both Uganda and Cuba became economic basket cases.
— Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.
(LIE-berals enjoy whining that United States impoverished Cuba by refusing to trade with them simply because they were Communists! But LIE-berals IGNORE the truth- that Cuba had all of South America to trade with- if only the debauched Soviet style Cuban economy could have produced anything useful to sell to South American neighbours! But people like Our idiot Boy Justin enjoy being staunch Socialists- the kind of people Lenin referred to as “useful idiots” because he used them to try to poison and subvert the western govts!)
( Certainly the Trudeau clan- useful idiots all- have done a fine job of weakening and crippling Canada with debts and policies that have produced a trade war with our closest neighbours! Papa Pierre and idiot son Justin hold the records for most costly and debt ridden govts in Cdn history!)
Gee, why not? They don't trust their own soldiers with firearms? ... but it's okay to arm all the civilians?
Beer Your comments like the opinions of those you choose to spew all over the place are just that opinions and slanted with innuendo and fake words.
Your comments like the opinions of those you choose to spew all over the place are just that opinions and slanted with innuendo and fake words.
Didn't Sarah Huckabilly Sauders say that during a news conference?
Didn't Sarah Huckabilly Sauders say that during a news conference?
worthless rebuttal to post an american article, when the topic is about a canadian shooting at danforth.
BTW, does anybody want to deny now that the registration of guns is only good for gov't confiscation??????