Gun Control is Completely Useless.

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
Yep, those qualify as "assault weapons" in my book.

And that refutes Colpy's claim. Thank you.

Though technically, Colpy said that the AR-15 design had never been used to kill in Canada. Technically true but irrelevant.
Also a guy shot up a college in Montreal killing one young girl with a berretta cx4

also an assault rifle that isn't.

most interestingly both the Ruger mini 14 and Berretta cx4 are not restricted weapons in Canada.

these are the actual weapons that Canadians are trying and have been trying to get banned.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Also a guy shot up a college in Montreal killing one young girl with a berretta cx4

also an assault rifle that isn't.

most interestingly both the Ruger mini 14 and Berretta cx4 are not restricted weapons in Canada.

these are the actual weapons that Canadians are trying and have been trying to get banned.


No military organization in the world uses a the Beretta Cx4, nor any weapon like it.


The Beretta is a PISTOL caliber carbine. The one used a Dawson College was chambered in 9 x 19mm.


Pistol calibers typically are a lot less powerful than rifle calibers. For example, the 9 x 19 generates (at best) about 400 ft/lbs energy, a .223 rifle (like the Mini 14 or AR 15) about 1300 ft/lbs energy at muzzle, and my deer rifle (.308 Winchester) about 2400 ft/lbs energy.


That is why the idiot at Dawson College had to shoot the one fatality multiple times with the Beretta to kill her.


He liked the Beretta, I guess because he found it "sexy" or something.


Thank God.


He left his Norinco 12 ga pump action shotgun, the mainstay of duck hunters, in the car. A 12 ga is the deadliest short range weapon known to man........



Loaded with 00 buckshot, in 2 3/4" Magnum configuration, a single shot delivers 12 pellets of .33 caliber. Shooting someone ONCE with it is about the equivalent of shooting them 8 or 10 times with the 9 x 19.


Shotguns kill with one shot almost 90% of the time. Handguns (including the popgun .22, .25 and .32) kill with one shot on average about 10% of the time, according to the FBI.


If the moron had used his shotgun, there wouldn't have been 19 wounded, there would have been at least another 12 to 15 killed.


Thank God for the Beretta.


BTW, the Beretta he used WAS restricted.



And you should know what you're talking about before you post.
 
Last edited:

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
https://www.timescolonist.com/news/...n-mass-shootings-still-not-prohibited-1.30831

Guns notorious for use in Canadian mass shootings still not prohibited
Jennifer Ditchburn / The Canadian Press
DECEMBER 18, 2012 07:36 PM



OTTAWA - Just as the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle has become a grim household name in the U.S. after the Sandy Hook massacre, a pair of semi-automatic firearms evoke similar memories — and debate — in Canada.

In the 1989 massacre of 14 women at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, Marc Lepine used a Ruger Mini-14 rifle, at the time equipped with a substantial magazine.

And in 2006, Kimveer Gill used a Beretta Cx4 Storm to shoot 72 rounds at Montreal's Dawson College, injuring 16 and killing student Anastasia DeSousa.

Neither the Ruger Mini-14 nor the Beretta Cx4 Storm are prohibited in Canada, despite the outcry from victims and their families, the occasional political grumble, and a pointed coroner's report in Montreal.

The Ruger Mini-14 is also not restricted, and since the death of the long-gun registry last spring does not need to be registered outside of Quebec.

On the flip side, semi-automatic rifles such as the Ruger Mini-14 are widely used by Canadian hunters and in rural areas. Semi-automatic weapons can fire off rounds in quick succession without reloading, but unlike an automatic weapon, the trigger mechanism must be re-engaged each time.

"Firearms owners would say it's a matter of freedom. If we're going to restrict everything that has any possibility to do us harm, then the government's going to be pretty busy," said Alan Voth, a firearms forensics expert and retired veteran of the RCMP.

"It's not the gun, it's the person. Why would we want to go around chasing our tails, trying to chase something that is not the problem?"

Semi-automatics were banned in Australia in the wake of a 1996 mass murder in Tasmania. The United Kingdom has more stringent restrictions on semi-automatics than Canada, in the wake of its own tragedies.

"Australia is a safer country as a result of what was done in 1996," former prime minister John Howard wrote last August.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended Canada's gun control system in an interview with Quebec's TVA network broadcast Tuesday.

"First, the most important thing to remember is that Canada has a gun control system that is much more strong and strict than the Americans," Harper said.

"We will not change the basis of this system. Actually, we have reinforced certain parts. We abandoned the long-gun registry because it was veyr costly and there we didn't see any benefits, but we are keeping a licensing system for owners, a registration system for handguns and (restricted) firearms, and we will keep this system that works."

But some critics say the system has not screened out what are essentially combat-style weapons.

In the case of the Ruger Mini-14, dubbed the "poor man's assault rifle" by opponents, Lepine used 30-round magazines that are now banned in Canada. Today, the largest magazine allowed holds five rounds.

The Ruger Mini-14 was one of the weapons legally obtained and used by Anders Breivik to kill 77 in Norway last year.

Former Liberal justice minister Irwin Cotler suggested in a 2005 letter that he'd like to ban the Ruger Mini-14, but later said it was a "mistake" following opposition from Canadian gun owners.

The Canadian Association of Police Boards passed a resolution at its conference earlier this year to reclassify certain firearms, including the Mini-14, as restricted.

The Beretta CX4 Storm used in the Dawson shooting is a less powerful weapon, called a semi-automatic carbine, with a trigger that resembles one on a pistol. It is more compact than the Ruger, and the cartridge reloads behind the trigger.

Montreal coroner Jacques Ramsay said in his 2008 report on the shooting that semi-automatics such as the Storm should not be available to the public and should be prohibited outright. Gill was able to obtain one as a gun-club member.

"It's a lighter rifle, it's easier to manoeuvre, but it is still very precise," Ramsay said at the time.

Former public safety minister Stockwell Day mused in the days following the Dawson College shooting about restricting firearms such as the Storm, but that did not happen. The Ottawa Citizen reported 46 new registrations for that model of gun in the month after the shooting, compared with just 16 the month before.

Heidi Rathjen, one of Canada's foremost gun-control advocates, says she and others have not called for a ban on all semi-automatics — just some of them.

She says the federal government has not reviewed or updated its list of restricted or prohibited firearms since 1996, and many out on the market are basically assault weapons masquerading as hunting gear.

"Ban military assault weapons, ban weapons designed to kill people in combat situations for civilian use," said Rathjen, spokesperson for Poly Se Souvient.

"They haven't done that. In fact, they've gone in the opposite direction by ignoring new assault weapons coming on the market and allowing many of them to stay even unrestricted so they're not even registered anymore outside of Quebec."

But Voth says there really is no substantial difference between the Ruger Mini-14, and other semi-automatics that are used frequently by hunters.

Even the Bushmaster AR-15, restricted in Canada to gun club enthusiasts with tight licensing requirements, only looks more menacing than other weapons that are unrestricted, he says.

"The ability to do a lot of damage with a firearm exists even with something as archaic as the Old West double-barrelled shotgun, which is limited to two shots," said Voth.

"It's absolutely unbelievable how fast a skilled operator can shoot and load something like that and the number of shots they can fire in a limited amount of time. The difference between that and a semi-automatic for the purposes of mass murder is inconsequential."

The RCMP did not respond to a series of questions about restrictions on firearms.

Harper said during the interview with TVA that he was greatly affected by what he saw on the news out of Newtown, Conn.

"It's very sad. As a father, it's very difficult to watch these images of children who were killed," said Harper.

"Over the weekend, in the end, I stopped watching. It's almost impossible to imagine how someone could do something like that to children. It's a great tragedy, and we're using the opportunity to remind our children of our love."
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
https://www.timescolonist.com/news/...n-mass-shootings-still-not-prohibited-1.30831

Guns notorious for use in Canadian mass shootings still not prohibited
Jennifer Ditchburn / The Canadian Press
DECEMBER 18, 2012 07:36 PM



OTTAWA - Just as the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle has become a grim household name in the U.S. after the Sandy Hook massacre, a pair of semi-automatic firearms evoke similar memories — and debate — in Canada.

In the 1989 massacre of 14 women at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, Marc Lepine used a Ruger Mini-14 rifle, at the time equipped with a substantial magazine.

And in 2006, Kimveer Gill used a Beretta Cx4 Storm to shoot 72 rounds at Montreal's Dawson College, injuring 16 and killing student Anastasia DeSousa.

Neither the Ruger Mini-14 nor the Beretta Cx4 Storm are prohibited in Canada, despite the outcry from victims and their families, the occasional political grumble, and a pointed coroner's report in Montreal.

The Ruger Mini-14 is also not restricted, and since the death of the long-gun registry last spring does not need to be registered outside of Quebec.

On the flip side, semi-automatic rifles such as the Ruger Mini-14 are widely used by Canadian hunters and in rural areas. Semi-automatic weapons can fire off rounds in quick succession without reloading, but unlike an automatic weapon, the trigger mechanism must be re-engaged each time.

"Firearms owners would say it's a matter of freedom. If we're going to restrict everything that has any possibility to do us harm, then the government's going to be pretty busy," said Alan Voth, a firearms forensics expert and retired veteran of the RCMP.

"It's not the gun, it's the person. Why would we want to go around chasing our tails, trying to chase something that is not the problem?"

Semi-automatics were banned in Australia in the wake of a 1996 mass murder in Tasmania. The United Kingdom has more stringent restrictions on semi-automatics than Canada, in the wake of its own tragedies.

"Australia is a safer country as a result of what was done in 1996," former prime minister John Howard wrote last August.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended Canada's gun control system in an interview with Quebec's TVA network broadcast Tuesday.

"First, the most important thing to remember is that Canada has a gun control system that is much more strong and strict than the Americans," Harper said.

"We will not change the basis of this system. Actually, we have reinforced certain parts. We abandoned the long-gun registry because it was veyr costly and there we didn't see any benefits, but we are keeping a licensing system for owners, a registration system for handguns and (restricted) firearms, and we will keep this system that works."

But some critics say the system has not screened out what are essentially combat-style weapons.

In the case of the Ruger Mini-14, dubbed the "poor man's assault rifle" by opponents, Lepine used 30-round magazines that are now banned in Canada. Today, the largest magazine allowed holds five rounds.

The Ruger Mini-14 was one of the weapons legally obtained and used by Anders Breivik to kill 77 in Norway last year.

Former Liberal justice minister Irwin Cotler suggested in a 2005 letter that he'd like to ban the Ruger Mini-14, but later said it was a "mistake" following opposition from Canadian gun owners.

The Canadian Association of Police Boards passed a resolution at its conference earlier this year to reclassify certain firearms, including the Mini-14, as restricted.

The Beretta CX4 Storm used in the Dawson shooting is a less powerful weapon, called a semi-automatic carbine, with a trigger that resembles one on a pistol. It is more compact than the Ruger, and the cartridge reloads behind the trigger.

Montreal coroner Jacques Ramsay said in his 2008 report on the shooting that semi-automatics such as the Storm should not be available to the public and should be prohibited outright. Gill was able to obtain one as a gun-club member.

"It's a lighter rifle, it's easier to manoeuvre, but it is still very precise," Ramsay said at the time.

Former public safety minister Stockwell Day mused in the days following the Dawson College shooting about restricting firearms such as the Storm, but that did not happen. The Ottawa Citizen reported 46 new registrations for that model of gun in the month after the shooting, compared with just 16 the month before.

Heidi Rathjen, one of Canada's foremost gun-control advocates, says she and others have not called for a ban on all semi-automatics — just some of them.

She says the federal government has not reviewed or updated its list of restricted or prohibited firearms since 1996, and many out on the market are basically assault weapons masquerading as hunting gear.

"Ban military assault weapons, ban weapons designed to kill people in combat situations for civilian use," said Rathjen, spokesperson for Poly Se Souvient.

"They haven't done that. In fact, they've gone in the opposite direction by ignoring new assault weapons coming on the market and allowing many of them to stay even unrestricted so they're not even registered anymore outside of Quebec."

But Voth says there really is no substantial difference between the Ruger Mini-14, and other semi-automatics that are used frequently by hunters.

Even the Bushmaster AR-15, restricted in Canada to gun club enthusiasts with tight licensing requirements, only looks more menacing than other weapons that are unrestricted, he says.

"The ability to do a lot of damage with a firearm exists even with something as archaic as the Old West double-barrelled shotgun, which is limited to two shots," said Voth.

"It's absolutely unbelievable how fast a skilled operator can shoot and load something like that and the number of shots they can fire in a limited amount of time. The difference between that and a semi-automatic for the purposes of mass murder is inconsequential."

The RCMP did not respond to a series of questions about restrictions on firearms.

Harper said during the interview with TVA that he was greatly affected by what he saw on the news out of Newtown, Conn.

"It's very sad. As a father, it's very difficult to watch these images of children who were killed," said Harper.

"Over the weekend, in the end, I stopped watching. It's almost impossible to imagine how someone could do something like that to children. It's a great tragedy, and we're using the opportunity to remind our children of our love."


You know what else isn't prohibited?


The Chevy Express van used to kill 10 in Toronto last year.


Nor the gasoline and a match used in Canada's worst mass murder........37 dead.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Bird_Café_fire


What's your point?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
you just made my point


Oh sorry. I didn't realize that your point was "You can't stop nuts from killing, so banning the use of inanimate objects by the citizenry is useless, and sometimes counter-productive"


But I am happy I helped you make the point.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
banning the use of inanimate objects by the citizenry is useless, and sometimes counter-productive"


You are blah-blahing about "inanimate objects" that have no other design criteria than to kill human beings. ... and WOW! ... MAGIC!!
They suddently become animate when some idiot picks one up and uses it.

You're goddam right they should be taken away from the populace.

Are you thick too? ... like Bondo?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,630
12,555
113
Low Earth Orbit
MY HUNTING RIFLE MODEL

WHAT MY HUNTING RIFLE MODEL COULD LOOK LIKE BUT STILL FUNCTIONS IDENTICALLY

Boo!

Bolt action assault rifle? That's funny.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
MY HUNTING RIFLE MODEL

WHAT MY HUNTING RIFLE MODEL COULD LOOK LIKE BUT STILL FUNCTIONS IDENTICALLY

Boo!
Sick fukcs do that all of the time. Unfortunately, I have no choice but to share a country with them, in spite of their spite.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
banning the use of inanimate objects by the citizenry is useless, and sometimes counter-productive"

You are blah-blahing about "inanimate objects" that have no other design criteria than to kill human beings. ... and WOW! ... MAGIC!!
They suddently become animate when some idiot picks one up and uses it.
You're goddam right they should be taken away from the populace.
Are you thick too? ... like Bondo?

define 'uses it'.

An RCMP officer 'uses it' every day often without firing a shot. A hunter 'uses it' to deliver nourishment to the family dinner table.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,805
2,336
113
New Brunswick
Well, I'll grant you partial points.


I said no one has been killed with an AR 15 in Canada. That is true.


The first report you linked said the rifle used in the murder was an AR 15. Then it said the rifle was a "machine gun" repeatedly. AR 15s are semi-automatic. They are not "machine guns". If the use of an automatic weapon in the article was correct, the rifle was NOT an AR 15.


In the second case you linked the woman was not killed. A terrible thing what happened to her, but she is still alive.


Unless you can clarify your link in the first instance, my statement still stands.


So as I said, the second story was about a crime, not that the person died. However, considering her injuries, and the fact it was a crime that was intended TO murder someone, it shouldn't be dismissed that easily. She was lucky, that's all.


As for the first story, here's what I found.


https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/ex-un-gangster-denies-he-supplied-gun-for-leclair-murder

He has already testified that Vallee told him within a week of the LeClair murder that he had killed him using the AR-15.
C testified that he had to compensate Trung $10,000 for the assault rifle used in the hit, as well as a second AR-15 that also had to be discarded afterwards.


I think in this case I'd then start to question how many murders have there been - related to civilians or criminal on criminal - that AR's have been used that no one has reported. It could be a small few, or it could be more.


In any case, point being that yeah, there has been at least one murder in Canada with an AR.


No, that doesn't mean we have a problem per say, definitely not like the US, but it also isn't something that should be taken lightly, either.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
So as I said, the second story was about a crime, not that the person died. However, considering her injuries, and the fact it was a crime that was intended TO murder someone, it shouldn't be dismissed that easily. She was lucky, that's all.


As for the first story, here's what I found.


https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/ex-un-gangster-denies-he-supplied-gun-for-leclair-murder

He has already testified that Vallee told him within a week of the LeClair murder that he had killed him using the AR-15.
C testified that he had to compensate Trung $10,000 for the assault rifle used in the hit, as well as a second AR-15 that also had to be discarded afterwards.


I think in this case I'd then start to question how many murders have there been - related to civilians or criminal on criminal - that AR's have been used that no one has reported. It could be a small few, or it could be more.


In any case, point being that yeah, there has been at least one murder in Canada with an AR.


No, that doesn't mean we have a problem per say, definitely not like the US, but it also isn't something that should be taken lightly, either.


Okay, I'll give you the point, and withdraw my claim.........


You do realize AR 15s are restricted in Canada, and must be registered?


And they are restricted to 5 shot magazines?


And as this firearm appears to be untraceable, and undoubtedly had a 30 round mag, it was most likely smuggled into the country?


Which banning them will not prevent.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
banning the use of inanimate objects by the citizenry is useless, and sometimes counter-productive"


You are blah-blahing about "inanimate objects" that have no other design criteria than to kill human beings. ... and WOW! ... MAGIC!!
They suddently become animate when some idiot picks one up and uses it.

You're goddam right they should be taken away from the populace.

Are you thick too? ... like Bondo?


Not a quick learner, are you?


I'm thick?


How many times have I demonstrated the numerous other uses for handguns?



Handguns are used for many, many other things besides killing humans.


Dozens, if not hundreds of designs are built specifically for target shooting and hunting, and are simply not designed, built, or at all efficient for use against humans.