Look, if you are going to make a case against AGW because of the carbon footprint of this event, then I am not convinced.
It means as much to me as pointing out Neil Young drives a gas guzzling Hummer or that Al Gore's house is it's own oilsands operation.
Believe me, I'm a skeptic so there would be nothing more pleasing to me to be proven wrong on this issue.
We are not laughing at the gullibility of the GW alarmists because of the carbon footprint of this event alone.
We are laughing at the gullibility of GW alarmists because those that are pushing it obviously don't believe it....
The carbon footprint of this event.
The next event, planned in Paris.......lol
Al Gore's huge mansions. His sale of his TV station to Qatar at tens of millions of profit.
Neil Young drives an electric car.....worth $1 million. His last one burst into flames, and burned down his garage and several classic cars. He touts it as the answer to GW. Neil is just whacked. Oh, and he has a couple of mansions. And he flies around on a private jet.
The "spokesperson" Leonardo DiCaprio.........drives a Tesla sometimes, which the taxpayer contributed tens of thousands towards.
Visited the World Cup on the world's fifth biggest yacht, owned by an oil baron, and jetted in 30 of his closest friends to party. How many mansions??
Michael Mann, who sues anyone that dares cross him in print or media.............but won't carry it through to the point where his research might be examined. His "hockey stick" has become a joke, his claims to be a Nobel Prize winner scream "con artist".
David Suzuki.....mansion, jets, and a demand that skeptic politicians be jailed. Gee there's a credit to progressives!!
Cameron, outraged at the oilsands, flying up here on his private jet to lecture us.
The Pause.
The question is not how could we not believe?? It is how could you actually trust these people?