Then it is time they quit committing crimes.
Gimme individual examples of Natives unfairly imprisoned and I'm on your side.
Play identity politics, and you are simply engaging in postmodernist stupidity.
Gerald Stanley Not Guilty
- Thread starter petros
- Start date
Then it is time they quit committing crimes.
Gimme individual examples of Natives unfairly imprisoned and I'm on your side.
Play identity politics, and you are simply engaging in postmodernist stupidity.
What sort of stupidity is it that does not believe than any of the thousands of First Nations in Canada have been imprisoned wrongly?
Your faith in the government is touching.
And providing the name of a wrongfully convicted first nations person.?
Come on Colpy, nobody is interested in something that you didn't do.
But if you're really interested here are 5 egregious cases of wrongfully imprisoned First Nations.
It turns out that - just like black people in America - Indians in Canada re less likely to get help for wrongful imprisonment.
More likely to be arrested
More likely to be tried/
More likely to be convicted.
More likely to receive maximums.
Less likely to be pardoned.
Yes you certainly live in a fair and just society Colpy - you ought to be very proud.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/j...-people-wrongfully-convicted-canada-1.3559644
Last edited:
Once again individual cases, and if you think I trust the state, ever, then you have not been reading what I write.
If you can not do that (and I have no doubt there are some) then you are simply talking through your hat.
BTW, the Stanley acquittal was justice done, if you actually pay any attention to the actual evidence. Which "progressives" absolutely refuse to do.
They are only individual cases when it suits your purposes. Sort of typical of you I am finding.
White guy in Saskatchewan is acquitted by all-white jury and white judge of shooting an indian.
White guy thinks it's legit.
What a shocker.
Why don't you give your argument merit by comparing it to other races that were wrongfully convicted and if the percentages are in favour of Native racism, or is it why our justice system is the way it is innocent until proven guilty and the burden is on the crown.
Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff... I'm shaking in my boots.
Dilligaf that you spout such absolute nonsense that even I can call you out on your retarded garbage all day long ?
Go for it.
I dare you. :lol:
and thanks for tapping out. Coward.
That is one of the most hilarious claims I have ever come across
Thanks for the laughs
.. Every village needs an idiot... Methinks that hoid is a master of the craft
Learn to read.
I said "the evidence"
Stanley didn't shoot him. It was a malfunction. In fact Stanley claimed he attempted to clear the gun before he approached the car, by pulling the trigger on what he thought was an empty chamber, then locking the slide back.
The evidence supports his version of events.
When the round detonated, it was backed out of the chamber by a centimeter. It would have been impossible for Stanley to pull the trigger and drop the hammer on the pin, and that pin to hit the primer while the round was that far out of battery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stanley Trial: Crown closes case, defence calls second gun expert | battlefordsNOW
Spencer called his first defence witness, firearms expert John Ervin, a former RCMP firearms instructor and armourer who said he has fired nearly a million rounds through a wide variety of firearms during his career. Ervin, like Williams, examined a cartridge casing fired through Stanley's Tokarev TT-33 handgun, which was found to be unusually deformed.
Ervin described the deformation as "a significant mis-shapen bulge near the case-head of the cartridge."
Earlier in the day, Williams presented several possible reasons for the bulge, including a mechanical malfunction or misfire, though he could not ultimately say what the cause was. The casing in question was found inside the SUV which was carrying Boushie when he arrived at Stanley's farmyard, while two other normal casings were found elsewhere in the yard.
When Gerald Stanley's son Sheldon testified earlier this week, he said in the immediate aftermath of the shooting his father told him the gun "just went off ... I bumped them and it just went off."
Ervin told the jury he concluded the bulge was due to the round discharging without being properly seated in the chamber. He said the location of the bulge on the side of the cartridge indicates the 7.62mm round was fired while the rear portion of the casing was about a centimetre outside the chamber (a state Ervin referred to as "out of battery").
"That cartridge was, at the time of ignition, 403 1000ths of an inch out of battery," Ervin said. "It had to be that far out in order for that case to expand to the larger portion of the chamber."
Stanley's pistol had a mechanical system which disconnected the trigger from the firing mechanism while the weapon was out of battery, Ervin testified, which meant the round was not fired with a normal trigger pull.
"The hammer could not strike the firing pin when it was that far out of battery," the firearms expert said. "The trigger disconnect would be engaged."
Despite the conclusions he reached about the unusual bulge in the casing, Ervin said during his testing he was not able to make the Tokarev fire a round with the cartridge so far out of proper position.
Hang-fire a possibility
Ervin presented two theories as to how the round was fired. The first possibility is a hang-fire, he said, which occurs when defective ammunition causes a delay between the trigger pull and the round discharging. The detonation could also have been caused by an external force striking the pistol's hammer or firing pin, he added.
"Hang-fires are extremely rare," Ervin said, but are often associated with older ammunition. Poor quality-control, improper storage and temperature fluctuations can make hang-fires more likely, he noted.
According to previous testimony, Stanley's pistol was loaded with Czech-made surplus ammuniton manufactured in the 1950s and stored in his shop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVIDENCE
Something post modernist idiots hate.
The actual case in question from the Stanley trial.
Last edited:
Gerald Stanley shot an Native Indian in the back of the head.. basically a back shooter, a coward, Yellow Coward..
Stanley if you’re reading this hope to god our paths ever cross, because I won’t shoot you in the back, but square in the face ya cowardly racist piece of shit.
Stanley if you’re reading this hope to god our paths ever cross, because I won’t shoot you in the back, but square in the face ya cowardly racist piece of shit.
Read my post three comments below.
I'd advise you, in future, to have some grasp of the facts before you make a fool of yourself again.
Colpy, give it a rest.. you back shoot someone are you going to admit it and go to jail.. duh
They guy is going to use every story to stay out of prison, every bull shit story.
In Canada it’s a felony to even point a firearm at another person. Period
...and Colpy idiots like this guy will be the cause for stricter gun laws.. and you know I love guns.
So you are so tough you are going to shoot him in the face , with what your night rag ?
Obviously, you are paying no attention to the evidence. Funny that he would come up with such an unlikely story.............and then the evidence would back his version up completely.
Go back and read the post I pointed out to you.
Remember the standard is "reasonable doubt".
Oh, and it is not against the law to point a gun at an armed person involved in criminal activity.