Fox News bought?

petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,293
14,499
113
Low Earth Orbit
This is old but it is well known FOX invented trash news and no where do they claim their news to be truthful.
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Status-quo media. It's ironic if you look at the demographics now, the prime advertising demographic is not a network news watcher. Fox News viewers have a median age of 65. Bill O'Reilly's viewers are closer to 70!

So, they continue to protect corporate interests, and they continue to lose the primary market demographic to the internet.
 
A

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Tonington said:
Status-quo media. It's ironic if you look at the demographics now, the prime advertising demographic is not a network news watcher. Fox News viewers have a median age of 65. Bill O'Reilly's viewers are closer to 70!

So, they continue to protect corporate interests, and they continue to lose the primary market demographic to the internet.
Click to expand...

So a bunch of angry old white guys like Walt and YJ is what keeps Fox going?:lol:
 
Machjo

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
B...b... but we have to defend the wr in Iraq to keep the money flowing to create jobs after all.
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Pretty much.

I get most of my news from news aggregators (including posters on forums like this), than I do from primary sources. It's more diverse.
 
SirJosephPorter

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Still, there are some in this forum who regard everything they see on FOX as the Gospel truth, absolute truth, and disbelieve anybody and anything that disagrees with FOX.

In my opinion, FOX isn't any more credible than the Enquirer. It is a waste fo time to listen to FOX. There are many reputable, reliable sources of news, such as CNN.
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The left wingnuts have their own drivel news as well. Never seen a televised one other than CBC which isn't so much left as Torontoist. but they do have Tyee News that is about on par with National Enquirer for accuracy.
 
Machjo

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
SirJosephPorter said:
Still, there are some in this forum who regard everything they see on FOX as the Gospel truth, absolute truth, and disbelieve anybody and anything that disagrees with FOX.

In my opinion, FOX isn't any more credible than the Enquirer. It is a waste fo time to listen to FOX. There are many reputable, reliable sources of news, such as CNN.
Click to expand...

When even some wise Republicans don't trust Fox, it's pretty bad.
 
SirJosephPorter

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
taxslave said:
The left wingnuts have their own drivel news as well. Never seen a televised one other than CBC which isn't so much left as Torontoist. but they do have Tyee News that is about on par with National Enquirer for accuracy.
Click to expand...

I find CBC a pretty reliable news source. But so are most national newspapers (Globe and Mail, Star, Post). While the newspapers may have different political biases, they are pretty accurate when it comes to news reporting.

They are starting FOX News North (started by a few of the Harper cronies), here in Canada. You may be sure that will be non stop propaganda for Harper and the Conservative Party. I heard they are going to name Harper the man of the year for 2010 and for 2011, to start with.
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Yes, and Fox News had reporters that were objective and reliable. Look what happened Jack...are you saying it's OK because other journalists are not objective? How is that fair and balanced? If they all do it, it's not really balanced. If they pull factual stories because it's inconvenient for their advertisements, that's not fair to the audience.

Don't shill for the unscrupulous Jack. It's a poor reflection.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Mainstream "news" is a joke. Best to get news from a variety of sources and cross-reference.
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Jack, this isn't about left or right....if you weren't so myopic you'd see that the topic of this thread has to do with corporate influence on what is reportable as news...not the narrow and absurd argument of left-media, right-media. Both left and right media produce news with perspectives, and perspectives aren't wrong, there just perspectives. But changing the factual results, because of threats from lawyers? I mean how do you feel about BP preventing press and others from taking photos on public beaches? That is corporate control of the news.

Is that kosher?
 
Y

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Tonnington, I am not so myopic as to categorically reject and call any news source with whose editorial stance I might disagree with as unreliable. It takes a certifiable fool to do that.

I regularly watch the most biased and fate-filled MSNBC. I read almost every day on-line articles in MSM publications. Sometimes it is only good for a deep sigh or a laugh, But I most definitely would not dismiss them.

I also find that it is much easier to watch news where the anchors are personable.

Some here would dismiss FOX and would praise CNN (or MSNBC) if they all presented, verbatim, news items dispatched from Reuters or AP.

There is no accounting for cement-headed ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom