Yeah, it all sounds very nice but not too convincing to someone with half a brain. I'd like to know the distance between the cop and the victim!
Yep.........................................when you are the reason he is already dead.
Forcillo Guilty
- Thread starter CDNBear
- Start date
Yeah, it all sounds very nice but not too convincing to someone with half a brain. I'd like to know the distance between the cop and the victim!
Yep.........................................when you are the reason he is already dead.
Actually, it is pretty simple and distance is irrelevant. The prosecution chose the charges. They separated the sequence of events into 2 events.
Event 1: cop fires 3 bullets into punk. Punk is killed. For this cop is charged with second degree murder (no pre-medidation but intent). Jury acquits cop of this charge.
Event 2: several seconds after event 1, with punk now dead on the floor, cop first about 6 more shots into punk's body. The charge chosen for this is attempted murder as it has a minimum sentence. For this the jury convicts.
Now if you are talking about distance, then you are talking about event 1. The jury did not feel he was unjustified in discharging his firearm. I guess if you have an issue with that, you should talk to them. For event 2 the distance from the target is irrelevant.
Yep.........................................when you are the reason he is already dead.
But he was acquitted of those charges.
He was acquitted if defending himself but not the subsequent sadistic KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL part afterward. He may get a very light or even no sentence for that. One thing that sure as hell shouldn't happen, though, is that this fruit loop should NEVER be given a gun and set loose in the public with one again. He doesn't have enough of a clue
Mandatory minimum is 4 years. Average is 13 years. Given first offense, and unlikeness to re-offend, I think it will be about 8 years although that is a guess. Cop union is fighting the minimum as well so that may change as well.
So, who did they conclude did kill the kid?
I'd argue that distance is very relevant- if the cop was further than 20' away from the kid I'd argue he was in little imminent danger.
I think if justice is even close to being meted out, he has to serve 10 years in prison at hard labour. The case looks like a sham to me!
Hey Cannuck- I think you could be a very wealthy man if you could just sell the secret of how someone so mentally bankrupt can survive for so long. You must have set a world record already. Come on - let us in on the secret!
The jury concluded that the cop was not guilty of second degree murder of the punk. That is all they were asked to do. In case you are having some difficulty understanding, this is the role of juries. They take the accused as presented. The prosecution shows them why he/she should be convicted. The defense counter-argues. The jury decides whether the prosecution has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt. This jury found the prosecution did not do that beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury is not responsible for finding alternative explanations or suspects.
You should discuss this with the jury. They didn't see it that way.
You didn't complain when your little terrorist murderer friend Omar was released after only 6 years. Hypocrite.
Everyone gets the death sentence, Just a question of time. In the mean time people that do bad things should have their peepee's slammed shut in a sliding glass arcadia door and a hot spear rammed up their azz at the same time.
.
You didn't complain when your little terrorist murderer friend Omar was released after only 6 years. Hypocrite.
I might be a hypocrite (who isn't?) but 2015 - 2002 = 13 years. Moron!
I haven't been informed yet that in Canada it is carved in stone that a citizen has to agree with a jury! Where have you been?
Just as good as Wikipedia I believe.
"During a firefight on July 27, 2002, in the village of Ayub Kheyl, Afghanistan, in which several Taliban fighters were killed, Khadr, not yet 16, was severely wounded.[7] After being detained at Bagram, he was sent to Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba. During his detention, he was interrogated by Canadian as well as US intelligence officers.
Khadr was the first person since World War II to be prosecuted in a military commission for war crimes committed while still a minor. His conviction and sentence were widely denounced by civil rights groups and various newspaper editorials.[8] His prosecution and imprisonment was condemned by the United Nations, which has taken up the issue of child soldiers.
On September 29, 2012, Khadr was repatriated to Canada to serve the remainder of his sentence in Canadian custody.[9] He was initially assigned to a maximum-security prison but moved to a medium-security prison in 2014. Khadr was released on bail in May, 2015"
Perhaps you can kindly inform us which streets he was free to walk from 2002 until 2010, since YOU apparently are so up on your "facts"!
cop union?I hope it has teeth,if so it would be the first union for cops to act like one.
what is the union called,would like to know more about them.
182 Every one who
(a) neglects, without lawful excuse, to perform any duty that is imposed on him by law or that he undertakes with reference to the burial of a dead human body or human remains, or
(b) improperly or indecently interferes with or offers any indignity to a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
i did some information auditing on jury selection,placed simply jury;s should not be believed to be in receivership of correct information,or may be amongst poor design of information.I might be a hypocrite (who isn't?) but 2015 - 2002 = 13 years. Moron!
I haven't been informed yet that in Canada it is carved in stone that a citizen has to agree with a jury! Where have you been?
or may be picked to fall into a legal trap
Jury selection is not a process which is designed for justice in mind,actually the opposite is true, this is why one should not believe the verdict of juries?
That is correct......................and at that point you can still make up your own mind!
(I think David Milgaard might even agree with that) His Mother didn't let go of the matter.
Last edited:
Good points, Petros, never thought of that!
I'm inclined to agree with you, in fact I would even say common sense would lead to that conclusion!
