Forcillo Guilty
- Thread starter CDNBear
- Start date
...with a Glock?
We haven't heard much about the police sargeant who came along at the end of the shooting and Tasered the twitching corpse. He's probably scot free.
As it has been explained, it is attempted murder because the shots he was convicted of happened AFTER the guy died. You can't kill someone who is already dead. This was how the prosecution chose to separate the charges -- by the 2 volleys of bullets.
thanks Petros. I hadn't considered over use. all the times I've partied with it we only did it for a single night months apart. Never over and over again. I think some of the above is scare mongering from the anti drug crusaders, but that's not to say that he didn't take Xctasy and LSD. Xctasy is not the same as MDMA. But kids don't seem to know that. Nor do they get their stuff checked.
Kittens are a reflection of their owners....just sayin..
shhhh! You're gonna give the forest industry further reason to decimate forests in foreign lands.
The last six bullets is attempted murder
htps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx2iQnYMQfMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx2iQnYMQfM
htps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx2iQnYMQfMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx2iQnYMQfM
Last edited:
You can't kill someone who is already dead, but you can apparently attempt to kill someone who is already dead. I get the explanation, but its still an odd one.
It's an extremely unusual situation to have so much objective evidence in the form of video from different angles. This guy just shot and shot and shot. Yatim's spine was severed by the first shot so all of the others were to kill some demon in Forcillo's head. He must have felt pumped. Too bad, no one took HIS blood sample. This might be a case of 'roid rage, looking at that cop's physique.
I have a stupid question.......................When you encounter a body with 9 bullet holes in it how do you figure out which was the first one fired etc.? Seems like a bunch of bull sh*t to me.
It was also explained that they wanted something with a minimum sentence. They could have gone with firearms charges but those do not have minimums. Also they split it from the first shots because statistically juries don't tend to convict cops of murder. There is some talk about suggesting that the criminal code be amended with a special murder designation for killed by cops with reduced sentences to allow for a better and more honest conviction rate. I personally think murder is murder but I can see why they did the split. They probably achieved the maximum possible sentence. Minimum sentence I believe is 4 years for attempted murder.
That is the job of the coroner and the forensics team. The coroner determined he was dead after the 3rd shot. You can clearly hear 2 sets of shots -- 3 and then 6 or so more a couple of seconds later. Those 2 volleys represent the 2 sets of charges. The first, the cop was acquitted. The second he was convicted.
It's a crock of sh*t is what it is. There's an old saying "you can fool some of the people all the time and all the people some of the time................................".