Financial Post: Climate change will cost the U.S. hundreds of billions

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Climate change will cost the U.S. hundreds of billions, report warns

Annual property losses from hurricanes and other coastal storms of $35 billion; a decline in crop yields of 14%, costing corn and wheat farmers tens of billions of dollars; heat wave-driven demand for electricity costing utility customers up to $12 billion per year.

These are among the economic costs that climate change is expected to exact in the United States over the next 25 years, according to a bipartisan report released on Tuesday. And that’s just for starters: The price tag could soar to hundreds of billions by 2100.

Commissioned by a group chaired by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Secretary of the Treasury and Goldman Sachs alum Henry Paulson, and environmentalist and financier Tom Steyer, the analysis “is the most detailed ever of the potential economic effects of climate change on the U.S.,” said climatologist Michael Oppenheimer of Princeton University.

The report lands three weeks after President Barack Obama ordered U.S. regulators to take their strongest steps ever to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including requiring power plants to cut carbon dioxide emissions to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030.



Called “Risky Business,” the report projects climate impacts at scales as small as individual counties. Its conclusions about crop losses and other consequences are based not on computer projections, which climate-change skeptics routinely attack, but on data from past heat waves.

It paints a grim picture of economic loss. “Our economy is vulnerable to an overwhelming number of risks from climate change,” Paulson said in a statement, including from sea-level rise and from heat waves that will cause deaths, reduce labor productivity and strain power grids.

By mid-century, $66 billion to $106 billion worth of coastal property will likely be below sea level. There is a 5% chance that by 2100 the losses will reach $700 billion, with average annual losses from rising oceans of $42 billion to $108 billion along the Eastern Seaboard and Gulf of Mexico.

Extreme heat, especially in the Southwest, Southeast and upper Midwest, will slash labor productivity as people are unable to work outdoors at construction and other jobs for sustained periods. The analysis goes further than previous work, said Princeton’s Oppenheimer, by identifying places that will be “unsuited for outdoor activity.”

Demand for electricity will surge as people need air conditioning just to survive, straining generation and transmission capacity. That will likely require the construction of up to 95 gigawatts of generation capacity over the next 5 to 25 years, or roughly 200 average-size coal or natural gas power plants.

As utilities add the construction costs to customers’ bills, people and businesses will pay $8.5 billion to $30 billion more every year by the middle of the century.

The report does not make policy prescriptions, concluding only that “it is time for all American business leaders and investors to get in the game and rise to the challenge of addressing climate change.”

Climate change will cost the U.S. hundreds of billions, report warns | Financial Post
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,326
14,505
113
Low Earth Orbit
By mid-century, $66 billion to $106 billion worth of coastal property
Why all the doom and gloom?

It sounds great for the economy.

What will the new coastal properties be worth?

When the boxing day tsunami happened peasants living seaside were washed away and then new hotels and resorts that moved in are now worth a fortune and earning a fortune from the cleaned up areas.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I think some big biz has figured out a way around the tards. Lip service and that is it.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Annnnnnnnnnnn, heer's from the CBC:

"http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/climate-change-will-cost-big-business-dearly-report-warns-1.2685682""


Says it's gonna cost Big Business dearly...................(translation)..........Don't pick up the soap.

Annnnnnnnnnnn, heer's from the CBC:

"http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/climate-change-will-cost-big-business-dearly-report-warns-1.2685682""


Says it's gonna cost Big Business dearly...................(translation)..........Don't pick up the soap.

Climate change will cost big business dearly, report warns - Business - CBC News

Ah, there's the link. Little bastard hiding again. No https either. ah well.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
And it won't cost a penny to move them.



It appears we agree on something.

In the past boom towns were expanded and people thrived. When these towns were no longer viable, people got up and left - they took their capital and labor so that other areas prospered. Nothing wrong with doing the same thing today. Simply get up and leave with your capital and in the long run the costs for insurance and upkeep will be considerably less than if they were coastal towns.

Therefore, these projected costs (assuming they are accurate) can be cut down dramatically.

A thought occurred to me - in the past coastal cities were essential because we exported so many goods. Today we import too damn much foreign stuff. This costs Americans far too many jobs. All the more reason to have less coastal cities - lets create our own stuff, rebuild the infrastructure, keep our capital and our jobs at home where they belong. The first step would be to move those big cities inland away from the hazards of rising cities (again, assuming this report is accurate).
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Climate change will cost the U.S. hundreds of billions, report warns

Just hundreds of billions?

Small potatoes.... the last few wars have cost trillions and wasn't much of a concern regarding costs.

$12 Billion a year is like a weekend skirmish with some cave dwellers.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Just hundreds of billions?

Small potatoes.... the last few wars have cost trillions and wasn't much of a concern regarding costs.

$12 Billion a year is like a weekend skirmish with some cave dwellers.


The difference is that we don't get the opium bonus.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
It appears we agree on something.

In the past boom towns were expanded and people thrived. When these towns were no longer viable, people got up and left - they took their capital and labor so that other areas prospered. Nothing wrong with doing the same thing today. Simply get up and leave with your capital and in the long run the costs for insurance and upkeep will be considerably less than if they were coastal towns.

Therefore, these projected costs (assuming they are accurate) can be cut down dramatically.

A thought occurred to me - in the past coastal cities were essential because we exported so many goods. Today we import too damn much foreign stuff. This costs Americans far too many jobs. All the more reason to have less coastal cities - lets create our own stuff, rebuild the infrastructure, keep our capital and our jobs at home where they belong. The first step would be to move those big cities inland away from the hazards of rising cities (again, assuming this report is accurate).

You're even stupider than your avatar.