Just went through the thread and see nothing , I think you mentioned Stormy Daniels .So to me it appears you lose . And notice I never called your intelligence or lack there of into question .
You - just went through the thread and noticed you mentioned stormy daniels, which was a huge case of corruption that involved trump. So i couldn't see any examples of corruption involving trump.
Me - you're an idiot.
You - I can't imagine why you're calling me an idiot when all i did was say you didn't give any examples after mentioning i saw an example.
I'm sorry but it's one thing to say you disagree with an example, or that you don't feel it's a good example or aren't sure why i consider it to be an example. But when you CITE an example and then state that there isn't any examples... how exactly are you thinking people are going to respond to that?
I answered your initial question in good faith. You have demonstrated bad faith in your replies. I have all kinds of patience for rational discussion and such but virtually zero for deliberate stupidity or bad actors. Your replies DO call your intelligence into question. If that's not something you want, then don't reply like that.
As to 'losing' - you lost the moment you chose to be dishonest about it. Here's a hint in life - if you find you have to lie or be dishonest to make a point, it probably wasn't a very good point.