I was living in Argentina back then. The neo-Nazi, evil military were cutting us into pieces, torture and the like. Then came our salvation: the Falklands War. It was a war Argentina had prepared for a long time, yet they had it planned for 1983-4; contrary to what people in Argentina believed, the Argentine military had great equipment, yet they had not finished the planning. The great factor was Margaret Thatcher. The Argies, male chauvinists to the core, underestimated Thatcher, "Hey, Britain is led by a woman, this is a piece of cake for us." For real, I know their mentality. Yet the Argentine Army was brave only to abduct, torture, and kill innocent Argentinians; when it had to try itself at Goose Green only one (1) army officer fought along with army staff personnel and conscript soldiers, what a bunch of cowards! Sadly, Colonel Jones died in that battle; in what I am concerned, he died for my freedom as an Argentinian, so he is my hero along with Thatcher. Since you are raising this issue, the Argentine military took the Falklands War to be a battle only; in their minds the war is still going on, simply because they have modified Von Clausewitz war doctrines to mean that war is a permanent state of affairs, a radically Hobbesian vision of the world and war. As a free-lance journalist here in Buffalo, NY, I have long come to the conclusion that Argentina has a small nuclear weapon stockpile, as a CIA declassified document from the Eighties suggested it was to happen. So think about it, the same madmen, the same military schools in Argentina, plus the possibility of nuclear weapons. Believe me, they do want to take over the Falklands. Of course, Britain is a tough cookie; Argentina is intent in making Cuba's national security doctrine of a "Caribbean Vietnam" against the United States a Latin American cause. There may be more to come...
I have to warn the readers that in every forum I produce my opinions against Argentina fakes from that nation show up to post opinions against mine, yet which are not sincere opinions. Those of you in this forum would be surprise at how much Argentine espionage there is out there; so when I begin to give my opinions against Argentina most obviously Argentine intelligence officers begin to impersonate people from any country. Yet by reading between the lines it is not that difficult to detect them as intelligence officers. In fact, this is the first time I am going public against the Argentine military. No "conspiracy theory" here, but intelligence and geopolitical analysis only. Then, a question naturally arises: why are Western governments so silent about these things pertaining Argentina? Isn't it obvious to the governments that there is a "new Trilateral," this is Argentina, Iran, and Venezuela? Look at how Hezbollah is setting up operations in Venezuela; how the Argentine Army provided Hezbollah with explosives to attack both the Israeli Embassy and the DAIA Jewish social center in Buenos Aires. Plus the international campaign, even at the United Nations, Argentina is making regarding the Martin Garcia island; this is in order to "vindicate" the "natives" of Martin Garcia, the latter not being natives at all; yet Argentine diplomacy knows that it pays off to side with "the oppressed," the "victims," however sad it may be that these people were displaced from their island: what Argentina wants is to trash both Great Britain and the United States over the Martin Garcia matter. With the sole purpose to set the United Nations against Britain regarding the Falklands issue.
Those of you interested in the Falklands issue may read the only newspaper of the Falklands, Penguin News. In that newspaper, you will find out how Argentina keeps the peaceful people of the Falklands harassed by any possible means; from an Argentine Navy "blockade" meant to entice Cuba into Argentina's game only (i.e. the U.S. blockade of Cuba); plus permanent harassment to cruise ships heading to or returning from the Falklands. Periodically, Argentinians "invade" the Falklands, for instance when they illegally entered the Falklands to make a shameful movie called "****land," the main idea of which is not but the Nazi German Lebensborn's. As the Argies (I am now a U.S. citizen) are crazed about blondes: a freaky fantasy of dominance. Make no mistake: beneath the appearance of democracy in Argentina there is a Nazified society. The model is similar to the model Jonah Goldberg poses in "Liberal fascism," this is a liberal Gleichschaltung silencing opinions in the United States. Same thing in Argentina, but it is a fascist Gleichschaltung. I may begin to post here passages of my investigative work to make the whole matter more understandable; for now, I only want to say that there is a lot of misinformation in the West. Perhaps Canada, as a bilingual nation, is a little less misinformed than we are in the United States. Then, President Obama never misses a chance of mushing with Argentina's president; take a look at the pictures of Obama with Cristina Kirchner. The latest of which, in Colombia, had Obama mistranslating "Falklands" into "Maldives."
A fragment of my investigative work: "In 2012, an Argentine athlete,Fernando Zylberberg, was infiltrated, early in the morning, into Port Stanley,the capital of the Falkland Islands; then he was illegally filmed while joggingand excercising in town. One has to seeZylberberg’s face before he hides his head under a hoodie: he really looks likea criminal. For it was a criminalendeavor disguised as legitimate propaganda: Zylberberg was an illegal alien,to begin with; a “respectable” athlete lending himself to one such a game. Yet the video portrays him both as a heroand, of course, a patriot, while he runs by the Penguin News and otherlandmarks of Port Stanley. The video ofthe above illegal alien affair at the Falklands was then made into ancommercial and shown on national television in Argentina. It ends with some words for “ the fallen”soldiers, and the official seal of the Presidency of the Republic of Argentina."
But, then, PresidentObama might even hold a grudge against Great Britain, for what J. ChristianAdams have to say in “Injustice-Exposing the racial agenda of the Obama JusticeDepartment” when quoting President Obama’s own words about growing op inHawaii: “My grandfather was a cook to the British in Kenya. Grew up in a small village and all his life,that’s what he was –a cook and a house boy. And that’s what they called him, even when he was 60 years old. They called him a house boy. They wouldn’t call him by his last name. Sound familiar?” (Op. Cit. page 106). One can smell Postcolonial politics in theabove words. For instance, the “evilcolonialist British” against “victim Argentina.” VictimArgentina: one just has to find out what happened to Argentine soldiers atthe hands of their own officers during the Falklands War. Indeed, veteran Argentine soldiers keptsilent for years about the abuses they endured by the own officers at theFalkland War; only recently they have begun to fight back. Anything from Argentine Army officers torturing soldiers to making conscript soldiers go hungry.
Sorry that when I post directly from my manuscript it does not come up right; but you will get my point. By 1976, Argentina made a significant geopolitical shift. First, it no longer considered sovereignty over the Falklands a matter of sovereignty over the South Atlantic: it turned to be a goal of seizing these islands. The neo-Nazi military's plan was, on one hand, to settle the conflict with Chile over the Beagle Channel by force; then attacking the Falklands; finally, go against Brazil on account of Argentina's covet for the fertile lands of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. Why the latter? Because, unlike in the United States, the ideal of wealth in Argentina is owning a big ranch to raise cattle by the dozens of thousands. As you all know, cattle raising requires no technology, plus there is almost no risk in terms of an investment. When Argentina was created as a nation, the land seized from the Indians was given away in a manner that military leaders got literally thousands of square miles of land; a huge cattle-raising oligarchy was thus formed. The Argentine military long for that model of a society because it would reproduce the old patriarchal type of societies. Nothing else will make that kind of fascists happy. In the end, seizing the Falklands in 1982 was just a milestone; the real objective for Argentina being to be the ruler of South America. It is a true Nazi mentality, and it is still there in Argentina. It would only take a coup d'état for the Argentine military to give it another try to the Falklands; yet they know it well, Britain is well-prepared. Thus Argentina's plan to isolate Great Britain in the United Nations; then hoping President Obama finally takes a firm stand against Britain regarding the Falklands, for instance as a matter of "Postcolonial politics," which Obama intensively discussed in his youth.
I can only hope that, should the moment come to confront Argentina on the side of Great Britain, Canada stands very firm for Britain. One would prefer war not to be the solution for problems in international relations; yet sometimes it is the only solution. Canadians played a significant role against European Nazism during the Second World War; thus I regard Canada as a nation that will stand up for freedom. For, sooner or later Argentina will show its teeth, the true colors of its "democracy," an Orwellian democracy of which I managed to flee in 1982. In passing, I love Montreal; I still have to visit Vancouver.
