Fake CNN video on 9-11

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Wrong on both counts. F for the course. Please repeat.



At a department seminar held on September 22, 2005, Jones presented the substance of the paper that would become "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?".[9] His hypothesis is that on September 11, 2001, the World Trade Center towers and World Trade Center 7 collapsed as a result of controlled demolition, not the impact of the airplanes that hit them or the fires that followed. In his paper Jones underscores what he says are deficiencies in the official explanations, including: symmetry of the collapses, speed of the collapses, characteristics of dust jets, reports of molten metal in the debris piles, failures of the official collapse theories; and calls for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition hypothesis along with the release of all relevant data by the government. Shortly after the seminar Jones made the paper available on the website of the physics department of Brigham Young University. It would eventually be published in a book of essays critical of the official version of the September 11, 2001, attacks, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.[10]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones


get inform for real, next time.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Wrong on both counts. F for the course. Please repeat.


Not wrong at all,however you are wrong all the time, sylverstein, the owner of building 7 admitted to have demolish building 7 with explosives, in a documentary Called "America rebuild", get real.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Again because it's NOT the same spot...it is so obvious. The CNN shot was taken by zoom lens from far back, looking over the stupid lamposts. My money says that CNN shot was taken from a boat or even from the Jersey shore.


IF the shot was taken from a boat we wouldnt see it this way in the beginining., the starts of the shot was taken from the ground very near the building,, then zoom out at the end , like it is in the water, which doesnt make sense at all.

In cnn shot, the plane, goes lower than a top of the building, which is 40 floor tall, which is again impossible, the second plane, never went lower than any building, except twin towers, that is the difference beetween people who still can think for themselves, and people like you.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Logic... you are so far out there now with this is people can't even debate you. Seriously... you are that far gone. Even other conspiracy buffs think guys like you are dumbing and watering down 9/11 conspiracies.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Besides who cares?

It's just TV....

Imagine the mileage you could get out of the notion that this nasty Ba'ahist dude had stockpiles of neurotoxins and chemical weapons and a nuclear weapons capability....over in some foreign country somehwere...say Iraq for instance...

The "conspiracy theory" is after all an art form.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Here are some facts that work against 9-11 conspiracy theories that try to prove the twin towers were brought down by implosion....

1. Implosion as a method of demolition is so dangerous only a handful of companies world-wide will touch it.

2. Implosion requires careful preparation.....hundreds of hours of interior destruction opf walls, secondary beams, stripping away of heat shields, carefull placing of explosives..........all under the exacting supervision of one of the very few engineers competent enough to pull off the implosion of a large building........

3. The largest building to be successfully demolished by implosion was 47 stories high............that's with all the careful preparation that was impossible in the WTC.

4. Imploding buildings collapse from the BOTTOM up, not the middle down.............

5. All those film clips you see of buildings collapsing in ways unlike the WTC are completely irrelevant.....there was NEVER, before or since, another building built using the same construction methods as used in the WTC.........it is a case unto itself ONLY.

So, the entire idea that the WTC was brought down by explosives is ludicrous, once and for all.

Of course, everyone understands why the conspiracy theorists are so single-minded, so unable to see the facts....

The simple truth is that if the WTC was brought down by terrorists in Boeing 760s, then G.W. Bush's reaction was NOT that of a lunatic meglomaniac, the invasion of Afghanistan was actually necessary, there is a real problem with Islamic terrorism, perhaps Guantanimo is a necessary evil......

In other words, they HAVE to believe the WTC was brought down by a neo-con conspiracy, if not, their entire framework of belief collapses like a house of cards.....or like the WTC when hit with a Boeing.

Oh yea, I forgot. They are crazy as well.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Colpy

And were the millions of people who doubted the rationale behind the invasion of Iraq crazy too?

One conspiracy...one idea displeases you because it's more comfortable to believe the people who lied to the world....

Doesn't seem to be a very strong argument when you put it into the context of the Iraqi invasion...

And like I said who cares?

We'll embrace one story because its what we're fed...conditioned to believe....but draw the line at deciding what's "legal" according to some formula that these very same folk...the ones that gave you Iraq and told you the story of the WTC mess...and call Canadians serving in Afghanistan legal so the legality of the Pandora's Box of terrorism opened by coincidentally these same people...who rejected international law...and have demonstrated a preparedness to ignore the Geneva Conventions and use torture and kidnapping to demostrate the most effective means of combatting terrorism...

Thanks Colpy...its all perfectly clear to me now....
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
I'dratherbe skiing


Yeah and don't ya get a kick out of people who watched Colin Powel at the U.N. telling the world that there was an urgent need to bomb the living daylights out of Iraq and kill Saddam Hussein....

Or how about George Bush on CNN standing in the rubble of 9/11 exorting Americans to use the best weapon against terrorism..."Get out there and buy something..."

Or how about the hundreds of lies and fabrications made by those folk in America that have been exposed and clearly establish that the people of America and the world were lied to about almost everyghing to do with Afghanistan Iraq and now the latest...Iran...

There's much greater truth on TV.....
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
IF the shot was taken from a boat we wouldnt see it this way in the beginining., the starts of the shot was taken from the ground very near the building,, then zoom out at the end , like it is in the water, which doesnt make sense at all.

He must have had an unzoom lens. Maybe he bought one of those tourist telescopes and put it in front of his camera backwards. That must be it.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,294
2,911
113
Toronto, ON
I'dratherbe skiing


Yeah and don't ya get a kick out of people who watched Colin Powel at the U.N. telling the world that there was an urgent need to bomb the living daylights out of Iraq and kill Saddam Hussein....

Or how about George Bush on CNN standing in the rubble of 9/11 exorting Americans to use the best weapon against terrorism..."Get out there and buy something..."

Or how about the hundreds of lies and fabrications made by those folk in America that have been exposed and clearly establish that the people of America and the world were lied to about almost everyghing to do with Afghanistan Iraq and now the latest...Iran...

There's much greater truth on TV.....


Are you telling me Collin Powell DIDN'T say that at the UN? Are you saying George Bush did NOT stand in the rubble and say what he did? The facts are they did those things. And TV did cover them. However, that doesn't make what they said the truth.

But expecting anyone to believe a video posted on youtube (I am sure unedited :roll: ) or by entries made on a public domain site like Wickepidia as fact is beyond reason. Sorry, I don't do the tinfoil hat thing because I am told to by somebody on the internet.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Logic... you are so far out there now with this is people can't even debate you. Seriously... you are that far gone. Even other conspiracy buffs think guys like you are dumbing and watering down 9/11 conspiracies.


Prove me wrong or shut up.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Here are some facts that work against 9-11 conspiracy theories that try to prove the twin towers were brought down by implosion....

1. Implosion as a method of demolition is so dangerous only a handful of companies world-wide will touch it.

2. Implosion requires careful preparation.....hundreds of hours of interior destruction opf walls, secondary beams, stripping away of heat shields, carefull placing of explosives..........all under the exacting supervision of one of the very few engineers competent enough to pull off the implosion of a large building........

3. The largest building to be successfully demolished by implosion was 47 stories high............that's with all the careful preparation that was impossible in the WTC.

4. Imploding buildings collapse from the BOTTOM up, not the middle down.............

5. All those film clips you see of buildings collapsing in ways unlike the WTC are completely irrelevant.....there was NEVER, before or since, another building built using the same construction methods as used in the WTC.........it is a case unto itself ONLY.

So, the entire idea that the WTC was brought down by explosives is ludicrous, once and for all.



Oh yea, I forgot. They are crazy as well.


Everything you say, is based on speculations, the building started to collapse when each bottom of building exploded, that is why columbia university recorded 2.1 and 2.3 seismic records before each collapse, which is also supported by thousand of witnesses, and police report, now i say get real mr spéculations.


Just try to prove me wrong on this thread, you might start having a point, until then, get real.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Prove me wrong or shut up.

You have been proven wrong time and time again. You are a laughing stock to not only us but to people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job. The conspiracy buffs think that people like you are watering down their theories.