Fake CNN video on 9-11

[Logic 7]

Again, what are you trying to prove? What are you suggesting happened, and is proven by your youtube videos?

Look, New york, is the probably the most documented city in the world, if you guys could prove me wrong, it would have been easy just like that, but none of you did, you did try to bring this discussion to a nut point,i didnt fell into your stupidity, now prove me wrong, or go away, simple as that.

 

[Zzarchov]

To prove you wrong, you first have to make a statement and back it up with proof.

Photos and videos on youtube are not by themselves proof, unless you prove the claims they make are true.

If it is such a well documented city YOU make the case, YOU do it if its so easy.

Now, prove yourself right, or go away, simple as that. Seriously, get the point.

 

[Logic 7]

It's not the exact same spot. The angle is sharper looking up. The CNN was likely taken from further back with a zoom lens, and also apparently slightly to the left.

Here are your missing buildings, behind the trees and camoflouged by the smokey background.

http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/1778/compareghostpwndaw9.jpg

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=8885

Very wrong, look again,they hide what cnn doesnt show, with the cnn video, i means, get real, and it is about time.


tell me what is wrong with this image?

it is the exact same spot, this proves the cnn shot isnt real.


The building on left side of the photo, is even higher in cnn video than the other, quite funny if you ask me.

 

[Logic 7]

To prove you wrong, you first have to make a statement and back it up with proof.

Photos and videos on youtube are not by themselves proof, unless you prove the claims they make are true.

If it is such a well documented city YOU make the case, YOU do it if its so easy.

Now, prove yourself right, or go away, simple as that. Seriously, get the point.

GO away, and get a life.

 

[Just the Facts]

Very wrong, look again,they hide what cnn doesnt show, with the cnn video, i means, get real, and it is about time.


tell me what is wrong with this image?

it is the exact same spot, this proves the cnn shot isnt real.


The building on left side of the photo, is even higher in cnn video than the other, quite funny if you ask me.

No, it proves it's not the exact same spot. So, now that the missing buildings are back, CNN faked the video because the building on the left is too high. Too funny.

 

[Johnny Utah]

On this video, cnn video editor are so stupid, they forgot to put buildings in the background, moreover, trees arent that high. watch it, it is incredible.

This is one is also from cnn, many different angle, and also totally different burning flame, very funny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKef6598Gak&mode=related&search=




No wonder why CNN took those out of their own web site.

.

The difference between the two pictures is the picture is two different seasons. The first is of the Towers as they burned this was in Sept 11, 2001 where it was a warm Summer like day, the other was obviously taken during the Fall or Winter as there's no leaves on the tree..

This of course doesn't matter to Moonbats like Logic0 because CNN must have been in on it with Da Joooss and we all know how he feels about them.. :idea:

 

[IdRatherBeSkiing]

If its on the internet or youtube, it must be 100% factual right?

 

[Logic 7]

.

The difference between the two pictures is the picture is two different seasons. The first is of the Towers as they burned this was in Sept 11, 2001 where it was a warm Summer like day, the other was obviously taken during the Fall or Winter as there's no leaves on the tree..

This of course doesn't matter to Moonbats like Logic0 because CNN must have been in on it with Da Joooss and we all know how he feels about them.. :idea:

Look again with your eyes, now if you look at the photo during winter or fall, there is no leave on the tree, if the photo would have been taken during the summer, we wouldnt even see nothing at all, because the leaves would hide everything.

The leaves of the 2 photos, doesnt evven match at all, nice try novice.

 

[Zzarchov]

Except THOSE second set of Photos are 5-6 years older.

Tree's do infact grow in 6 years. Seeing as those tree's probably aren't more than 25-30 years old total, (judging by lamp post height), 6 years of growth is consistent with the difference.

But hey, the concept of living plants growing is obviously a conspiracy.

 

[TenPenny]

Look again with your eyes, now if you look at the photo during winter or fall, there is no leave on the tree, if the photo would have been taken during the summer, we wouldnt even see nothing at all, because the leaves would hide everything.

The leaves of the 2 photos, doesnt evven match at all, nice try novice.

Telephoto lenses. The pictures are taken from different distances away. You didn't take photography in school, did you? It's quite obvious.

Nice try.

A for effort, F for fact checking, overall, a C.

 

[Logic 7]

Here is the final proof, for the hard headed



http://www.livevideo.com/video/B534...fake-footage-blasted-mor.aspx?lastvcid=168990




Have fun!!

 

[Zzarchov]

Again, not proof. Those shots are almost 6 years appart.

You've got trees (now that I see better) no more than 15-20 years old in the first shot, and taller trees (gasp!) that are 21-26 years old in the second.

Case closed. Your proof has been refuted (notice the date)

 

[Logic 7]

Again, not proof. Those shots are almost 6 years appart.

You've got trees (now that I see better) no more than 15 years old in the first shot, and taller trees (gasp!) that are 21 years old in the second.

Case closed. Your proof has been refuted (notice the date)

Watch it, don't pretend you did, other people took pictures from that spot on 9-11, watch it, you will realize, there is a black building which has nothing to do to be there, and lamps are also missing,you clearly see a photo showing it, the trees couldnt double in 6 years, that is just a sad fact.

 

[Zzarchov]

More food for thought Logic:

IF they faked the plane video. They would take an existing shot of the region, and digitally add in a plane.

IF it is impossible to take that shot from that angle, they could not get that shot to then add the plane too.

Instead they would have to move to a different vantage point, take the footage and add the plane.

If the shot is impossible, its also impossible for them to alter.



edit: or in 6 years they took down the posts, and the Trees would only need to go up another 4 or 5 feet to change the angle to the second photo.

Which is perfectly normal. Again, case closed.

 

[Toro]

Well, let's say Logic is correct.

First, lamp posts and trees can be built and planted.

Second, so what? What are you trying to prove Logic?

 

[wallyj]

If the videos are faked all it proves is that someone faked a video. It doesn't prove that hundreds of secret demolition experts snuck into the 2 largest office buildings in the world and over the course of a weekend they rigged it to implode and no one noticed. Or everyone noticed but they were all in on the plot,even though thier friends ,family members,co-workers and even themselves were doomed to die. They sacrificed thier lives for George Bush'es oil policies. Makes sense to me,but then again I don't have a brain.

 

[Logic 7]

If the videos are faked all it proves is that someone faked a video. It doesn't prove that hundreds of secret demolition experts snuck into the 2 largest office buildings in the world and over the course of a weekend they rigged it to implode and no one noticed. Or everyone noticed but they were all in on the plot,even though thier friends ,family members,co-workers and even themselves were doomed to die. They sacrificed thier lives for George Bush'es oil policies. Makes sense to me,but then again I don't have a brain.

Wtc 7 has been already proved to be the work of a demolition team, steven e jones found "thermate"+sulfur from both wtc tower, which is a the proof of a controlled demolition work.

Now CNN faked those videos, on what purpurse? there is no reasonable answer, except being involved in the attack.

 

[Logic 7]

More food for thought Logic:

IF they faked the plane video. They would take an existing shot of the region, and digitally add in a plane.

IF it is impossible to take that shot from that angle, they could not get that shot to then add the plane too.

Instead they would have to move to a different vantage point, take the footage and add the plane.

If the shot is impossible, its also impossible for them to alter.



edit: or in 6 years they took down the posts, and the Trees would only need to go up another 4 or 5 feet to change the angle to the second photo.

Which is perfectly normal. Again, case closed.

The shot from cnn, was just not real, they entirely faked it.

The trees would have needed to double, then yes your theory would make sense,in summer,leaves make the trees look higher than it is in reality, it is a very known fact.

 

[Just the Facts]

Watch it, don't pretend you did, other people took pictures from that spot on 9-11, watch it, you will realize, there is a black building which has nothing to do to be there, and lamps are also missing,you clearly see a photo showing it, the trees couldnt double in 6 years, that is just a sad fact.

Again because it's NOT the same spot...it is so obvious. The CNN shot was taken by zoom lens from far back, looking over the stupid lamposts. My money says that CNN shot was taken from a boat or even from the Jersey shore.

 

[Just the Facts]

Wtc 7 has been already proved to be the work of a demolition team, steven e jones found "thermate"+sulfur from both wtc tower, which is a the proof of a controlled demolition work.

Now CNN faked those videos, on what purpurse? there is no reasonable answer, except being involved in the attack.

What exactly would be the point of demoing a burnt out husk of a building. And how, pray tell, do you keep explosives from going off for over seven hours in a blazing inferno. Some amazing technologies, these neocons have.