Wtc 7 has been already proved to be the work of a demolition team, steven e jones found "thermate"+sulfur from both wtc tower, which is a the proof of a controlled demolition work.
Wrong on both counts. F for the course. Please repeat.
Wtc 7 has been already proved to be the work of a demolition team, steven e jones found "thermate"+sulfur from both wtc tower, which is a the proof of a controlled demolition work.
Wrong on both counts. F for the course. Please repeat.
At a department seminar held on September 22, 2005, Jones presented the substance of the paper that would become "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?".[9] His hypothesis is that on September 11, 2001, the World Trade Center towers and World Trade Center 7 collapsed as a result of controlled demolition, not the impact of the airplanes that hit them or the fires that followed. In his paper Jones underscores what he says are deficiencies in the official explanations, including: symmetry of the collapses, speed of the collapses, characteristics of dust jets, reports of molten metal in the debris piles, failures of the official collapse theories; and calls for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition hypothesis along with the release of all relevant data by the government. Shortly after the seminar Jones made the paper available on the website of the physics department of Brigham Young University. It would eventually be published in a book of essays critical of the official version of the September 11, 2001, attacks, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.[10]
Wrong on both counts. F for the course. Please repeat.
Again because it's NOT the same spot...it is so obvious. The CNN shot was taken by zoom lens from far back, looking over the stupid lamposts. My money says that CNN shot was taken from a boat or even from the Jersey shore.
Oh, give it up. You're insane.
IF the shot was taken from a boat we wouldnt see it this way in the beginining., the starts of the shot was taken from the ground very near the building,, then zoom out at the end , like it is in the water, which doesnt make sense at all.
I'dratherbe skiing
Yeah and don't ya get a kick out of people who watched Colin Powel at the U.N. telling the world that there was an urgent need to bomb the living daylights out of Iraq and kill Saddam Hussein....
Or how about George Bush on CNN standing in the rubble of 9/11 exorting Americans to use the best weapon against terrorism..."Get out there and buy something..."
Or how about the hundreds of lies and fabrications made by those folk in America that have been exposed and clearly establish that the people of America and the world were lied to about almost everyghing to do with Afghanistan Iraq and now the latest...Iran...
There's much greater truth on TV.....
Logic... you are so far out there now with this is people can't even debate you. Seriously... you are that far gone. Even other conspiracy buffs think guys like you are dumbing and watering down 9/11 conspiracies.
Here are some facts that work against 9-11 conspiracy theories that try to prove the twin towers were brought down by implosion....
1. Implosion as a method of demolition is so dangerous only a handful of companies world-wide will touch it.
2. Implosion requires careful preparation.....hundreds of hours of interior destruction opf walls, secondary beams, stripping away of heat shields, carefull placing of explosives..........all under the exacting supervision of one of the very few engineers competent enough to pull off the implosion of a large building........
3. The largest building to be successfully demolished by implosion was 47 stories high............that's with all the careful preparation that was impossible in the WTC.
4. Imploding buildings collapse from the BOTTOM up, not the middle down.............
5. All those film clips you see of buildings collapsing in ways unlike the WTC are completely irrelevant.....there was NEVER, before or since, another building built using the same construction methods as used in the WTC.........it is a case unto itself ONLY.
So, the entire idea that the WTC was brought down by explosives is ludicrous, once and for all.
Oh yea, I forgot. They are crazy as well.
Prove me wrong or shut up.