Without ALL of the facts, it's very hard to ascribe "entitlement" mentality to armed forces personnel regardless of rank.
Example; brother, a chief ERA warrant officer RCN assigned to oversee parts of procurement and installation of upper deck machinery for Tribal class frigate program was posted from Victoria B.C. to Montreal PQ. His house realty fees, moving costs, air fare for his wife and mileage expenses for him driving a vehicle across, realty fees for purchase of home in Pierrefonds Mnt'l. were all covered.
Within a week after his arrival, it became apparent he was to perform the bulk of his duties in an office in St. Catherines On. and was expected to commute on a weekly basis with costs being reimbursed for flights or whatever, whereupon he suggested it would have made more sense to locate him there and he could file electronic reports and attend periodically required meetings in Mntl. instead.
What did our intrepid Gov't. do? Why they rented him an apartment in St.Catherines within walking distance of his office and paid the monthly rent while he rented out his house in Pierrefonds. They (Gov't. DND) can clusterflop the most simple of arrangements through bureaucratic bungling but the individual affected should not be to blame nor should they experience any financial loss if being moved at the behest of the gov't.
Without knowing whether this move was "suggested" for some 'post retirement' consultancy position we cannot presume to judge.