Eliminating the center ..

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
How can one get rid of the centre so as to be really free - absolutely, not relatively?Is it possible to be absolutely free of the centre?:nike:
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,765
11,530
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I think so:



Hi China!
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
How can one get rid of the centre so as to be really free - absolutely, not relatively?Is it possible to be absolutely free of the centre?:nike:
What do you visualize/conceptualize to be the center you are trying to get rid of? It is a vague question to me.
 

Downhome_Woman

Electoral Member
Dec 2, 2008
588
24
18
Ontariariario
How can one get rid of the centre so as to be really free - absolutely, not relatively?Is it possible to be absolutely free of the centre?:nike:

Well - yeah - you could get rid of the centre but then the whole 'being' of the object would shift from being that of a glorious circle, to a - well ... lump of fried dough topped by icing and sprinkles. sorry - freedom's just another word .....
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Yeah, he often asks questions like that, and it's hard to know what he means. I think I know what my centre is, and I can't imagine why I'd want to eliminate it. Doesn't sound like being free to me, sounds like being either dead or reducing my IQ to about 14, neither of which I would be in favour of. Obviously he must mean something quite different from what I'd mean by "eliminating the center." I suspect there's something Buddhist behind that question, but Buddhism is one of many isms I can't see any use for or reality to. We will just have to await his return to find out what he means.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
How can one get rid of the centre so as to be really free - absolutely, not relatively?Is it possible to be absolutely free of the centre?:nike:
The center of what? lol Step outside the box for a while.

Anyway, people I know are always trying to stay centered. Being scattered is not that healthy.

Isn't off-centre the same as being off-balanced
That's what I thought.

Yeah, he often asks questions like that, and it's hard to know what he means. I think I know what my centre is, and I can't imagine why I'd want to eliminate it. Doesn't sound like being free to me, sounds like being either dead or reducing my IQ to about 14, neither of which I would be in favour of. Obviously he must mean something quite different from what I'd mean by "eliminating the center." I suspect there's something Buddhist behind that question, but Buddhism is one of many isms I can't see any use for or reality to. We will just have to await his return to find out what he means.
Too much Krishnamurti? lol
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
A religious man is a man who is alone— not lonely, you understand, but alone— with no theories or dogmas, no opinion, no background. He is alone and loves it— free of conditioning and alone— and enjoying it. Second, a religious man must be both man and woman— I don't mean sexually— but he must know the dual nature of everything; a religious man must feel and be both masculine and feminine. Third," and now his manner intensified again, "to be a religious man, one must destroy everything— destroy the past, destroy one's convictions, interpretations, deceptions— destroy all self-hypnosis— destroy until there is no center;
No center,
Then you are a religious person.
What is center ?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
A religious person is a follower of dogma. What you describe is a spiritual person, one without dogma, one who seeks truth wherever and whatever it turns out to be. I prefer eliminate to destroying past, convictions, interpretations, etc, because most, if not all, are socially conditioned responses to life spoon fed to us by those who think they know the truth. the spiritual person gets rid of his/her ego and learns humility and to act in integrity. To me religion requires a person's ego to follow blindly the dictates of others. A religious person has belief, a spiritual person has faith in life. As Allan Watts said, "Belief is holding to a rock, faith is learning how to swim in the stream of life."
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
A religious person is a follower of dogma
Follower of anything is just what he is .....a follower ,nothing else .
:lol:
What you describe is a spiritual person, one without dogma, one who seeks truth wherever and whatever it turns out to be
If you say that you are seeking something,what you are saying is that you know what you are seeking, looking for . ; and when you 'found it' , you have recognized it and realized that you knew it all along . You can't seek an unknown still holds truth in this part of the world.
To seek truth - is to deny It. Truth is now , in the present , from moment to
moment ,to be lived, not searched for.Most of the time we aren't satisfied with the "Truth" and are in process of searching for the 'real truth'.

the spiritual person gets rid of his/her ego and learns humility and to act in integrity.
[/QUOTE
Do you really believe that the virtues of humility ,integrity can be taught .....learned .
Do you think that a humble person is conscious of being humble?
.
To me religion requires a person's ego to follow blindly
We are talking about two deffinitions of religions..
"Belief is holding to a rock, faith is learning how to swim in the streamont of life."
Sounds romantic but personally, I dont believe in anything though I love to swim whenever I get a chance.:canada:
 
Last edited: