Yes I have, if the cost of dealing with the problem outweighs the costs of not dealing with the problem.
And one of the questions you avoided answering was wghat portion of the costs are related to people between 0.05 and 0,08.
If you can't answer that then you jhave no justification for saying it's too much.
If you did as I suggested and read the entire thread, you would see that I'm not saying people should be allowed to drive over 0.50 BAC. It all depends on how much of a risk they are and I have seen no good data on that.
And for about the 6th time, you reached a conclusion that too much is spent without having a basis for that conclusion. You openly admit to not knowing what is spent.
Post #323 sums up my position nicely and neither you, JLM or Goober have made any attempt to argue against that position
Because your premise is simply arbitrary.
-
Probably because most of them aren't relevant. You are actually asking me to post research that I have said I can't find and because I can't find it I have chosen my position as spelled out in post 323.
Right. You don't know how much is spent so it must be too much.
This is no different than if I were to say, I've seen no evidence that there is a god so I'm concerned about giving tax breaks to churches and you asking me to post research that there is no god.
lol Huge difference. I showed you evidence that over 0.05 impairs judgement and motor skills. You argued that the money spent on that is too much. I said that's a ridiculous statement because you don't know how much is spent, let alone how much is too much.
Besides, gods are at best a maybe. Costs, impaired drivers, etc. are tangible.
Post 204. Again, you should read the entire thread before you make blanket statements like that. You make yourself look foolish. You get upset when I point it out. You start attacking me personally and acting childish and I give you a red. It's a vicious circle. Let's turn it into a virtuous circle.
Sorry. But after several explanations in different ways, you cannot seem to grasp that not knowing the costs is not sufficient or rational reason for reaching your conclusion that it costs too much.
You make yourself look foolish.
Now look who's insulting and attacking character.