Do you think the opposition parties will succesfully form a coalition government?
- Thread starter Tyler
- Start date
Le chef du Block (Gilles Duceppe) est un homme intègre et qui tient a coeur les intérêts du québec. Il est loin d'être le méchant séparatiste décrits par les médias anglophone. C'est le genre d'homme que ca prendrais pour remettre le canada sur ses rails et faire l'unanimité entre les parties.
Il ne s'impliqueras pas dans aucun des ministères (100% certain) et aucun des blocquiste ne participra au gouvernement de coalition.
Ca va être le meilleur gouvernement que le canada aura jamais eu.
Il ne s'impliqueras pas dans aucun des ministères (100% certain) et aucun des blocquiste ne participra au gouvernement de coalition.
Ca va être le meilleur gouvernement que le canada aura jamais eu.
Si vous souhaitez discuter le Québec et la souveraineté, vous pouvez aller à la section française du contenu canadien. Respect, éraflure.
If you wish to discuss Quebec and sovereignty, you may go to the French section Of Canadian Content. Regards, scratch.
If you wish to discuss Quebec and sovereignty, you may go to the French section Of Canadian Content. Regards, scratch.
Hey Risus, I would not want Canada to brake up never......
Canada would be faced with irreversible financial damage in the cheating hands of the Cons
or
Hé Risus, je ne voudrais pas que le Canada ne freine en haut jamais ......
Le Canada serait fait face avec le dommage financier irréversible dans les mains de tricherie du fait de Tromper:smile:
Rs,
Here's the translation:
Gilles Duceppe will save Canada of the Idiots thus this coalition strenthen Quebecs soverenty
In my humble opinion it is oxymoronic. A solid Canada would make separation more difficult.
Make of it what you will.
IMO it makes absolutely no sense.
scratch
Here's the translation:
Gilles Duceppe will save Canada of the Idiots thus this coalition strenthen Quebecs soverenty
In my humble opinion it is oxymoronic. A solid Canada would make separation more difficult.
Make of it what you will.
IMO it makes absolutely no sense.
scratch
Last edited:
To make it easy and a little more palatable. Quebec can seperate. The boundries being Gatineau in the west going east to just northeast of Montreal and include the north Shore of the St. Lawrence.
Not to include James Bay, Montreal, the National Capital Region or anything on the South shore of the St Lawrence river
That way most of the "non-French" will still belong to Canada
Not to include James Bay, Montreal, the National Capital Region or anything on the South shore of the St Lawrence river
That way most of the "non-French" will still belong to Canada
So Tyr,
Are you going to separate into chosen sections the place that (one thinks)wants to separate.
In my opinion that doesn't make sense at all.
But to each his own. There was back in 1994 a plan for different counties that were connected and they were to call themselves `New Quebec`.
rgs
scratch
Are you going to separate into chosen sections the place that (one thinks)wants to separate.
In my opinion that doesn't make sense at all.
But to each his own. There was back in 1994 a plan for different counties that were connected and they were to call themselves `New Quebec`.
rgs
scratch
Good point.
I was wrong.....I spoke too quickly.
I was thinking of seat count, which is, of course, not at all proportional......
sorry about that.
although it does not change my position......Harper should go toe-to-toe, nose-to-nose with The Separatists and their lap dogs, whatever legal and constitutional manouvre is necessary.....to either make the coalition back down, or go to another election.
Rule by the Separatists, for the Separatists is simply not an option.......unless the people make that choice fully aware of the options.......
Nobody said, which is why I said If/When.... If they want to, or When they want to..... just as If Nova Scotia or Newfoundland or BC want to or when they want to..... any province should have the democratic right to pull out of the country if they deem it in their best interests, regardless if they speak french or english, which was the point I was trying to make.
Clearly that went over some heads.
Geez, my apologies for not having the forums attached to my nipples at all times so I can respond at your whim. See my previous post and next time stop trying to pull something that was never said out of thin air and read things for what was written. Just because you're a new member doesn't mean I'm not shy of sticking the details to you just like everybody else.
That's the thing.... I don't like this society, I never have.... it is flawed. (And I'm not about to recycle numerous posts over the years to explain why here.... there's a search function for that) And I'm not the biggest fan of the NDP and I have my own views on how things should be addressed in order to meet equal needs for all.... but out of the pile of ass clowns to pick from during an election, they're a hell of a lot closer and more on the ball then the other jokers in the deck...... even though I still do not agree with some of their approaches.
Last edited:
Praxius
sorry maybe i mist my replys to someone else post.
Je suis nouveau ici et j'essai de figurer ce que vous les gens de l'ouest percevez de ce qui se passe vraiment.
A la lecture de ces commentaires je me rend comptes que beaucoup de fausses informations circules et de nombreux épouvantail tout ca bien entendu ayant pour but de manipuler la population.
sorry maybe i mist my replys to someone else post.
Je suis nouveau ici et j'essai de figurer ce que vous les gens de l'ouest percevez de ce qui se passe vraiment.
A la lecture de ces commentaires je me rend comptes que beaucoup de fausses informations circules et de nombreux épouvantail tout ca bien entendu ayant pour but de manipuler la population.
Well the party you support is in bed with the party which wants to break up Canada, so you are spouting BS.
and forget the french crap....