It's only carbon turned into currency. It'll work a well as taxing the hell out of cigarettes did. No effect.
I think IMASCO would question that.
It's only carbon turned into currency. It'll work a well as taxing the hell out of cigarettes did. No effect.
You can drive by any high school to see how ineffective cigarette taxes have been.
As with any other tax imposed on industry they'll just pass on the "greening" cost. We'll end up paying the corporate tax and whatever Dion comes up with for us. A better arrangement would be to let the consumers change industry by using our purchasing power. The Automotive industry has already started to react with multiple choices of environmentally friendlier cars. The easiest way to change the world is with your wallet.
CO2 is a pollutant? CO2 dirties our air and water? What science classes have you been attending? Without CO2 we are dead and the more of it we have the more quickly plants grow.They aren't trying to stop a natural Earth cycle. Their intentions are to curb carbon pollution, and to change infrastructure.
The ramifications are: clean air and water. $hitty deal eh?
CO2 is a pollutant? CO2 dirties our air and water? What science classes have you been attending? Without CO2 we are dead and the more of it we have the more quickly plants grow.
Produces ozone?? Isn't the ozone layer being depleated?It's not a carbon dioxide tax, it's a carbon tax. Burning ever more fossil fuels acidifies the ocean. Maybe you think we don't need 50% of the oxygen in the atmosphere. Burning fossil fuels also produces ozone and other harmful air pollutants.
Just because something is a nutrient, doesn't mean it can't also be a pollutant. Never heard of pollution from fertilizer before Walt?
What science classes have you been attending?
You can drive by any high school to see how ineffective cigarette taxes have been.
As with any other tax imposed on industry they'll just pass on the "greening" cost. We'll end up paying the corporate tax and whatever Dion comes up with for us. A better arrangement would be to let the consumers change industry by using our purchasing power. The Automotive industry has already started to react with multiple choices of environmentally friendlier cars. The easiest way to change the world is with your wallet.
Does anyone on this site think this is fair? that two provinces, Alberta and Saskatchewan should be robbed of their wealth? This why liberals don't get elected here, Dion is a fool to think that we would just hand it over to him without a fight, does anybody know if that nonwithstanding clause would work in this instance.
ya, Central Canada.
Its not like we know anything about being robbed of our wealth to bail out the rest of the country.
Not like most of this countries history has been that song and dance.
Its not like we found the east to have better services than we have.
Its not like the equalization formula gets rewritten everytime Alberta has to pony up and pay money, or Ontario actually stops giving money.
Complaining about this as a bad idea is one thing.
The east and west complaining about their wealth being stripped away to benefit central canada is the pot calling the kettle black.
The majority of all the gas prices within Ontario are well under a buck 30 a litre.
Now why, pre-tell, is that?
Proximity to refineries.
And yet Alberta doesn't have any?
I can see a big oil refinary out behind where I work here in Dartmouth..... not helping much here.
Now why does Ontario have so many oil refineries when they have no oil apparently?
Considdering Nova Scotia still have oil itself, I see a Refinery out behind my workplace, which means the fuel doesn't have to travel very far..... and yet our prices are higher.
How does that make any sense at all and who's stupid idea was it to make Ontario the central basis of our oil production?