Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
thank you for your continued Locutus Brand™ moderation. Also... sorry to have burst your previous post's bubble! :mrgreen: You still mad, stalker?
It has been 18 months since experts said global warming would make California wet
https://twitter.com/SteveSGoddard/status/568152306568564736
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
https://twitter.com/SteveSGoddard/status/568152306568564736
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
California was wetter this winter than it has been in a while, I gather. Or maybe that's just NOAA fudging numbers, who knows? :lol:
Warmists claim sea ice declining. http://goo.gl/n4oYzr Not according to NOAA.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/568168687150223360
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/568168687150223360
Oh no...
Latest Surge of Arctic Air to Freeze Eastern Half of US
Oh no what is happening! Please stop!
Great Lakes ice growing faster than even last year's frigid winter | MLive.com
Latest Surge of Arctic Air to Freeze Eastern Half of US
Oh no what is happening! Please stop!
Great Lakes ice growing faster than even last year's frigid winter | MLive.com
Maybe it has. Could be NOAA fudging the numbers though. :lol:
Sounds like NOAA fudging numbers again.
No, I'm trying to see the logic in, in one instance, dismissing NOAA data as fudged and, in the next, using it to support your hypothesis. It's inconsistent. If you don't trust the data, then the logical conclusion (unless you have actually observed the data yourself) is "I don't know."
Probably is fudged. Reality is it is far colder than they report. Except on the west coast where it is normal. Flowers are starting to bloom.
It sucks when you can't fudge an ice cap that is in front of you.
Here... here use this...
Does that help?
The Official Iceland Temperature Series
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/the-official-iceland-temperature-series/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/the-official-iceland-temperature-series/
oh Locutus, why I oughta..... oh wait, what's this stated in the article:
"It needs to be emphasised that these are not raw temperatures, but have been carefully homogenised and adjusted where necessary, to account for station moves and equipment changes."
manipulated data!!! Fudged data!!!! :mrgreen: Oh Locutus, you're just too easy! Taxi, taxi.... somebody alert member taxi!
(note: of course, your article is from the same failed doofus "Paul Homewood" that you trotted out not that long ago... you know, the guy UK fake-jounalist Booker hyped... the guy who claimed NASA had manipulated/fudged the surface temperature data for Paraquay! What happened there, hey Locutus? :mrgreen: Sumthin bout Homewood having his azz handed to him, right? So, of course, here you are right back at it again! Oh Locutus, yer so funny!)
JunkScience.com @JunkScience Expert team plans to examine 'adjusted' temperature data — could be 'greatest scandal in history of science.'
What is particularly telling is the silence of the compilers of surface temperature records in response to requests from critics for a proper explanation of how and why they had needed to make so many adjustments to the original data.
http://goo.gl/md5apZ
What is particularly telling is the silence of the compilers of surface temperature records in response to requests from critics for a proper explanation of how and why they had needed to make so many adjustments to the original data.
http://goo.gl/md5apZ