Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
In all his portraits so far I just don't get the trust rays. Maybe when he was a kid it was different. He couldn't have been a lizard as a little boy, could he?
Hey now...heyyyyyy now...I'm known for my dots and I'm pretty effin' smart. 'sides, our boy's shift on cash at dollarama takes him away for extended periods of time and I may need to fill-in...but I don't question mark, sorry...people gotta figure out my syntax on their own...peace be with you and in the spirit of the season I give you:
He's alright, man.
It looks red hot don't it? I wouln't touch that chart with my bare hands. Red means hot to most children and I think this colour scheme will prevent many needless burns in the day care..
That red is blinding and hurting my retinas.
If I go blind, it will definitely be because of global warming
AN ESSAY ABOUT THE GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE FRENZY
Every few months some agency of the United States Government, the United Nations Intergovernmental on Climate Change or a professional organization issues another report on climate change/global warming. All of these reports have two things in common: they predict severe consequences as a result of climate change and they place the blame on the activities of our civilization’s use of fossil fuels. This Essay is written as a climate skeptic’s response to those documents which are always given widespread coverage in the national media.
This chart of data obtained from Ice Cores collected near the South Pole displays the longest known record of the climate of Earth. It goes back 400,000 years. Just look as the continuous pattern of changes ranging from very large to rather small. The four big dips are Ice Ages and the four big peaks are what we know as Interglacial Periods. The ice ages are very hostile to human life. It is during the warm periods that life flourishes. We are very lucky to be living our lives during one of the warmer periods of Earth’s history. Clearly the civilized activities of mankind including the burning of fossil fuels had nothing to do with these historic changes, large and small. After all, our modern times are covered by the last little squiggle on the right hand side of the chart. Can you look at this chart and identify Earth’s normal climate? Certainly we can compute the average, but is average the same as normal? I don’t think so.
Now let’s look at a chart of the last 11,000 years since the last Ice Age ended and we moved into the Interglacial Period. This is the period in which civilization has developed and flourished. The most difficult time was the little Ice Age from about 1550 to about 1800. Look at the tiny, little warm period on the extreme right hand side of the chart. It is during this period that our civilization began to make extensive use of fossil fuels for heating, cooling, electrical generation and to power internal combustion and eventually jet engines. Please note that this current warm spell looks no different than the others during the last 11,000 years.
Here is a chart of this last 1,000 years.
more
AN ESSAY ABOUT THE GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE FRENZY | John Coleman's Blog
Every few months some agency of the United States Government, the United Nations Intergovernmental on Climate Change or a professional organization issues another report on climate change/global warming. All of these reports have two things in common: they predict severe consequences as a result of climate change and they place the blame on the activities of our civilization’s use of fossil fuels. This Essay is written as a climate skeptic’s response to those documents which are always given widespread coverage in the national media.
AN ESSAY ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
By John Coleman
Written in November 2014
American Meteorological Society Professional Meteorologist for many years
Awarded the AMS Award as Broadcast Meteorologist of the Year
First Weathercaster on ABC’s Good Morning America
Founder of The Weather Channel.
Weather forecaster for over 60 years
“Climate Change is happening.” You bet it is. The climate of planet Earth has been constantly changing for as long as we have any records. Look at the chart below.
This chart of data obtained from Ice Cores collected near the South Pole displays the longest known record of the climate of Earth. It goes back 400,000 years. Just look as the continuous pattern of changes ranging from very large to rather small. The four big dips are Ice Ages and the four big peaks are what we know as Interglacial Periods. The ice ages are very hostile to human life. It is during the warm periods that life flourishes. We are very lucky to be living our lives during one of the warmer periods of Earth’s history. Clearly the civilized activities of mankind including the burning of fossil fuels had nothing to do with these historic changes, large and small. After all, our modern times are covered by the last little squiggle on the right hand side of the chart. Can you look at this chart and identify Earth’s normal climate? Certainly we can compute the average, but is average the same as normal? I don’t think so.
Now let’s look at a chart of the last 11,000 years since the last Ice Age ended and we moved into the Interglacial Period. This is the period in which civilization has developed and flourished. The most difficult time was the little Ice Age from about 1550 to about 1800. Look at the tiny, little warm period on the extreme right hand side of the chart. It is during this period that our civilization began to make extensive use of fossil fuels for heating, cooling, electrical generation and to power internal combustion and eventually jet engines. Please note that this current warm spell looks no different than the others during the last 11,000 years.
Here is a chart of this last 1,000 years.
more
AN ESSAY ABOUT THE GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE FRENZY | John Coleman's Blog
Which chart is correct? The one that says the Medieval Optimum peaked 800 years ago, or the one that says the Little Ice Age peaked 800 years ago?, And which scale is correct, the one that says it was 10°C or the one that says it was 15.5°C during the Medieval Optimum? John Coleman, we are skeptical.
They're not even close. :lol:
They're not even close. :lol:
JunkScience.com @JunkScience Survey of professional meteorologists on global warming DEBUNKS 'science is settled' and 97% Nonsensus claims.
http://goo.gl/vfxY3Y
of course, Coleman is a long-standing denier hack who has been repeatedly debunked on his crap... and no, John Coleman, is not a meteorologist... he is a but a TV weatherman! Looks like member Locutus (and his faithful lapper Walter) are really reaching the dregs by trotting out yet another Coleman fail! It's always quite telling that these wizards fail to present graphics that include a legitimate representative instrumental record for current day... talk about "Hiding The Incline"!
your blowhardiness doesn't allow you to speak for "the rest of the world"! Nor does it allow you to quibble over my choice of words, particularly when I've also spoken of criminal and/or civil liability outcomes in that thread.
The rest of the world does see it as a crime... A crime committed by ideological ecofanatics that see their cause slipping away.
To say that your choice of words is poor is a dramatic understatement... Much like your greentard masters, you parrot the same baseless talking points and thump your chest of the coming Eco-Armegeddon that will never materialize.
what I said... regardless of what you choose to make up!
but like I said, you have no standing to speak of impacts/effects/damage... not when you deny the impacts/effects/damage from GW/AGW/CC to the world's ecosystems.
Unlike your ideological self, I call it straight and use the most applicable language.
Vandals, criminals and ideological eco-terrorists
The last group that has any 'standing' to comment on the extent of the vandalism and ongoing impacts of those despicable actions are the greenpeace vandals and their useful idiot accomplishes, the IPCC
Greenpeace are a bunch of ignorant blowhards. And yet neither defacing a priceless historical artifact, nor condemning such an act, will change the properties of a carbon dioxide molecule.