I think it's all part of the "just keep throwing stuff and see if anything sticks" routine. :lol:
Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
I think it's all part of the "just keep throwing stuff and see if anything sticks" routine. :lol:
JunkScience.com @JunkScience Study by hokey stick co-author of @MichaelEMann reports tree ring-temperature correlation problems
http://goo.gl/dtzzef
For cryin out loud, why can't those trees ever think about the saplings just this once?
guys, guys... see Dendrochronology, see Divergence in select trees in select Northern latitudes. Rely on tree proxies for past climate... extending beyond the relatively short instrumental record period. When divergence occurs in the latter part of the instrumental record... here's the thing... you don't need to reconstruct, no need for proxies - it's called the instrumental record. The referenced study is keying on 1980 - are there pretty good temperature records in that period?
guys, guys... there are several factors considered as possible causal ties to the divergence... do you have a favourite candidate... or do you like em all? :smile:
guys, guys... there are several factors considered as possible causal ties to the divergence... do you have a favourite candidate... or do you like em all? :smile:
11,000 years. Interesting. About 11,000 years ago, where I'm sitting, was recently
under about a mile of ice which was then retreating. It is warmer now.
Steve Goddard @SteveSGoddard All time record snow cover during @NOAANCDC 's fake "hottest year ever"
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=4 …
more Goddard... more? Hey now, why don't you actually retweet those gems? Surely, just bringing them here isn't "bang for the denier buck", is it?
but hey now, about that increased snow in the Northern Hemisphere... does Goddard, do you, maintain that's a sign of "less global warming"? Is that what you're implying here? But hey now, that's GSL's analysis of NOAA's daily snow maps... don't let member 'taxi' in on this cause he adamantly maintains that NOAA is a proven 'Lying Liar'!
Climate Realists @ClimateRealists 35 Years Of Unprecedented Mann-Made Melting Has Left Sea Ice Normal At Both Poles
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/35-years-of-unprecedented-mann-made-melting-has-left-sea-ice-normal-at-both-poles/ …
JunkScience.com @JunkScience NOAA report says California DROUGHT mostly due to NATURAL CAUSES — NOT global warming.
http://goo.gl/C07nTd ''
ooops.
35 Years Of Unprecedented Mann-Made Melting Has Left Sea Ice Normal At Both Poles
Locutus! Just how many times do you need to be burned by serial misinformer "Steve Goddard"? Uhhh... when you know you're purposely misinforming, what does that make you? Your parroting of Goddard sure takes on a most self-serving definition of "normal"!
notwithstanding all that lost melted Arctic sea ice over the decades, the monthly November ice extent for 1979 to 2014 shows a decline of 4.7% per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average. And, again, but more pointedly this year, increased extent is typically new 1st year ice (not building multi-year ice) that will melt... first... during next years melting season. In this particular case I read that there was an unusually high degree of open water; hence increased ice forming.
the Arctic sea ice melting trend Locutus... melting trend! What's normal to... you?
and this is just extent! Should we talk volume Locutus? Would you like the long-term melt trend as reflected in sea-ice volume? Denier types are always so fixated on extent... but never seem to ever bring up volume! Why is that Locutus?
How's that ice free North pole these days?
Didja manage a nice cruise through there like they tried in Antarctica?... That was a huge success for da cause, wasn't it?
Didja manage a nice cruise through there like they tried in Antarctica?... That was a huge success for da cause, wasn't it?
It's on it's way, given the trend since the satellite readings started in 1979.
All time record snow cover during @NOAANCDC 's fake "hottest year ever"
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=4 …
Why would Goddard use snow in the northern hemisphere as a proxy for global temperatures? It doesn't snow much in Winnipeg in the deep winter. Does he provide any justification for use of such a proxy? No, I didn't think so. Humidity as important as temperature in snowfall.
Yes, that's a strange proxy, when we have, you know, thermometers...
Relative to where I guess? The average Dec-Jan-Feb snowfall in Winnipeg (60 cm) can fall in one Nor'Easter here in Charlottetown. Last winter we had nearly 280 cm of snow. But Winterpeg can keep it's cold, I'm fine with that
