I've barely been on the board; how many tricks were you expecting... hoping for?
Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
I've barely been on the board; how many tricks were you expecting... hoping for?
I have been. You're just an agenda troll, so you're blind to it.
It's why I knew you'd be entertaining.
Not true, that's just you projecting.
I'm still waiting for you to show me a quote from the last 30 days that supports your claims about me. I asked quite a while ago.
I actually have no hope of you even trying, or conceding that you've made an error. You're an agenda troll, therefore completely incapable of honesty.
I'd go as far as saying he needs you to state your position and claims succinctly, so he can scoop a canned reply off site.
I'd stake a lot on that being the case actually.
point the error out; why keep up your sham... just state what error I made. If its legitimate I most certainly will correct it. Please show me you aren't a troll, you have no agenda and that you're completely honest... just state my error.
Oh good, a challenge.
You stated that I was denier. Please show me a quote of mine where I clearly state that in some way shape or form.
This should be entertaining, lol.
I am a troll, a cannibal troll to be exact.
no - I answered your question; I stated I accept that AGW is occurring. I also stated your other 2 questions are not simple answers as they reflect upon varying scenarios inclusive of emission reduction strategies, policy directions, actions to adapt/mitigate/prevent, etc. Does your denier mind only think in absolutes?
You really haven't eaten anything for a while either. Hmmm, don't mind me, I'm just going to pop some corn and prop my feet up in the back.
Fine then, the scenario is that we do limited mitigation.
also, show where I have stated I do not believe in Climate change. Just include me in the search you're doing with Bear.
I am not a scientist.
I sincerely doubt you are either.
What arouses my severe suspicion of the GW panic is a number of factors:
1. The 97% concensus. BS. Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims - Forbes
2. The Al Gore phenom. Al Gore is a con artist, a liar of gargantuan proportions. Then he sold his broadcasting assets to QATAR. lol
3. The Celebrity pile-on. From people that, as I pointed out, each have the carbon footprint of a small town. DiCaprio attended the Brazil soccer matches on the fifth largest yacht in the world, and flew in 30 "friends" to keep him company. IMHO neither the yacht nor the aircraft were powered by solar panels. ANYTHING that encompasses this much hypocrisy needs to be approached with huge doses of suspicion.
4. "Scientists" claiming people that disagree with them should be jailed or worse. David Suzuki for example.
5. Dr. Michael Mann and his "hockey stick" hoax. Lousy data, massaged to fit preconceived ideas, produced by a serial liar that claims, among other things, that he is a Nobel laureate and his data has been verified by various scientific bodies. Nope.
6. The fact I was around in the late 1970s when the Chicken Little panic was the coming Ice Age....right.
7. The fact that so few of the predicted disasters of GW have happened. Where are the multitudinous massive storms?? Where is the ice free North Pole?? The vastly rising sea levels?? Quite simply, they aren't.
8. The fact that temperature readings are based on the last 150 years, which is 1/26666666 of the history of the earth.
9. The Pause.
10. The propaganda against resource development supported by outside oil producing areas like Qatar.
11. The fact that if the UN told me water was wet, I'd have to take a bath to be convinced.
12. The East Anglia e-mails.
13. The fact that the GW panic has meant nations and organizations have sunk hundreds of millions of dollars into climate research, collected by the very scientists that promote GW..........feedback loop.
Considering the above, you have to be a fool NOT to be a skeptic.
You do realize you're embarrassing yourself, right?
There are several, #2400 was the quickest to find.
I look forward to further evasion.
if you're genuine in your questioning... concerning forcings, per the IPCC:
So, whatever the graph/chart/table is suppose to represent, this is what has
been driving the global climate warming/cooling/change for ther last 4-6
billion years? Sorry, but I sort'a thought you'd answer in English.
A quick look at all his posts on the subject and my conclusion is that he is not really a climate change advocate....he just picked this thread to troll....Quite telling that his first post was on the shiny pony thread :lol:
if you want to play word games I could suggest that's a generalized statement about "know-nothing deniers". You've had little to offer other than claiming dishonesty, fabrication, emotion, etc.. Why not settle out your own very overt emotional stance and simply state what your position is on AGW, global warming, climate change. Simply step-up and state you're not the denier you believe I have labeled you. Waiting....
yet another drive-by? If you're going to spend time in the thread why not actually contribute to the thread topic/discussion?
