Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
of course, you've elevated beyond the lower level discussion on particular aspects of forcing impacts; do you honestly feel I could have interpreted your questions, these questions, from your most recent posts? Is this you guys being "honest" in your discussion approach?
a claim in regards to AGW? What kind of a moronic question is that? Gee, I accept it is occurring! No matter how much you're striving for a catchy one-liner, the other two questions are not simple answers; they presume on a myriad of possible scenarios that run the gamut from policy to adaptive/migitation/prevention response.
you quite the perceptive drive-by arteest! Like I said, do you actually have anything to contribute to the topic itself?
I answered you; I can't account for your lack of comprehension
That was going to be my line ya know. But that's okay, you can have it this time.
Seriously though, don't you just find the newbies with 'tude who are going to set everyone and everything straight, just a tad tiring sometimes?
Yes, especially when the resurrect an account made 5 years ago, and come out swinging with an agenda. You just know there's no real point in investing any effort. It's for not.That was going to be my line ya know. But that's okay, you can have it this time.
Seriously though, don't you just find the newbies with 'tude who are going to set everyone and everything straight, just a tad tiring sometimes?
That was going to be my line ya know. But that's okay, you can have it this time.
Seriously though, don't you just find the newbies with 'tude who are going to set everyone and everything straight, just a tad tiring sometimes?
and there's absolutely no 'tude in your posts... no, none at all!
I see! Your unwillingness to answer questions/requests is simply your not wanting to invest effort! What difference does the account make. If you have a concern about the legitimacy of the account I expect you should bring this forward to a board moderator.
Actually, it is you that has proven that you are unwilling to answer direct questions. I asked you one, and you have done nothing but dance around it. Let's keep it straight as to who does what.
I answered you; what you didn't answer was how you ever could have interpreted I would have known what your questions were. Again, you elevated a lower level discussion point into your nattering request for me to state what my claim is! Duh... only when I repeatedly asked you for context did your actual questions come forward; questions that had nothing to do with the discussion at hand and the quotations you were making. Quit talking shyte, hey!
I doubt it.
Not really, it's more like your question is stupid.
Is that a question?
I'm not concerned, I already noted that you looked entertaining. I was right.
if only you could be as forthcoming. For some reason you have a real difficulty in answering fairly basic questions/requests.
and you still have not answered the question directly. The one question covered it quite nicely, it was only when you seemed unable to comprehend the question that I broke it down. Even then, you still have not directly answered the question, but instead, have chosen to continue your dance. All I can do is surmise that you really don't have a clue about AGW and are just mouthing what you have been indoctrinated with.