Death knell for AGW

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
again, you state there are several drivers of climate; yet you refuse to name them. If you don't accept anthropogenic forcing as the principal driver behind today's relatively recent global warming/climate change... just what is it you're actually saying? Instead of all your bluster and accusations of dishonesty and fabrication, why not just step up and plainly state, clearly and unequivocally, what drivers you attribute to today's relatively recent global warming/climate change.

I didn't make any such claim. Why fabricate? Are you that desperate?

Oh how the irony is palpable.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
The ones making the statement that no change has taken place need not "prove" squat.

that's quite the denier tactic! Both items mentioned are measurable. If you choose to make the original claim (as was done, by others, when I entered this thread) that oceans aren't warming, that global warming isn't occuring, you most certainly have the means to be able to confirm your "no change" assertion.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Oh how the irony is palpable.

yes, clearly... you should be able to plainly and clearly support your statements. For some reason, you're wildly avoiding any such effort:

again, you state there are several drivers of climate; yet you refuse to name them. If you don't accept anthropogenic forcing as the principal driver behind today's relatively recent global warming/climate change... just what is it you're actually saying? Instead of all your bluster and accusations of dishonesty and fabrication, why not just step up and plainly state, clearly and unequivocally, what drivers you attribute to today's relatively recent global warming/climate change.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
I'm glad you admit your failings, you really should work on them, and your lack of honesty. Your instant lack of integrity will get you nowhere.

yet more fabrication? I was told this board had an assortment of die-hard know-nothing deniers... who could have imagined it was this pervasive?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
yet more fabrication? I was told this board had an assortment of die-hard know-nothing deniers... who could have imagined it was this pervasive?
Yes, that is an excellent example of your dishonest fabrication.

Now that you recognize it, maybe you could do a little self repair and deal with it. If your out of control emotions will allow.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
I bumped my question. Why won't you answer it?

So what is your claim then?

as I said, I have no intention of trying to piece together and make sense of your continued nonsense. If you have a specific question, ask it. I have no context with which to answer the "your claim" question... put it in context.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I bet five bucks he pseudo-answers your first question but not your second one. Wanna bet?



Nope.....because if he answers the original question he would have to admit my original assertion was correct.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
as I said, I have no intention of trying to piece together and make sense of your continued nonsense. If you have a specific question, ask it. I have no context with which to answer the "your claim" question... put it in context.




What is your claim in regards to AGW? What is your claim to be the end result? Why is AGW a big deal?