Death knell for AGW

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
I didn't say any such thing; however, you can continue to flaunt your pet theory for all it's worth... when the legitimate scientific community accepts it as the principal causal tie behind today's relatively recent warming, then... and only then... will your pet theory have credence.
Would you stand in front of your microwave if you knew 15-20% of the material that protects you no longer exisits?

magic cycles?

As magic as menstrual cycles.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
There are just shy of 2300 posts in this thread.

You're welcome to go through them all and find examples from all across the globe

Or you could look at the average global temperature.

 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Yes or no?

You don't like questions that trap you into admission?

admit what? I asked you to make your (original) question relative to today's relatively recent global warming. You refuse to do so. Apparently you want to say something about geomagnetics and a "loss of protection"... you just can't bring yourself to actually making a relative statement in that regard.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
More Hansen adjusted graphs?

A minute ago you were ascribing recent warming was due to the shift of the magnetic poles. Now you're saying it's all made up. That's what it's like arguing with deniers. They just move seamlessly from one incompatblie theory to the next.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
your point?
Yes, my point where only idiots dismiss drivers that don't fit their narrative or agenda.

You mean the one where you assert climate doesn't change in relation to forcings? That one?
Oh oh, you seem upset enough to make stuff up now. Maybe you should take a break. I can see how me causing you to embarrass yourself has made you emotional. Honesty is always the first casualty of a loss of control.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Yes, my point where only idiots dismiss drivers that don't fit their narrative or agenda.

Oh oh, you seem upset enough to make stuff up now. Maybe you should take a break. I can see how me causing you to embarrass yourself has made you emotional.

why would I be upset/emotional with your nonsense? Clearly you're a denier wannabe! What have I made up?
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Oh wow, now you're just embarrassing yourself.

if bluster/fabrication is your way of avoiding pointed questions, well done. Again, you claim I made something up - step up and support your claim... what did I make up?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
if bluster/fabrication is your way of avoiding pointed questions, well done. Again, you claim I made something up - step up and support your claim... what did I make up?
More projection and dishonesty?

If your position was so sound, and you weren't all emotional at the moment, you wouldn't need to project your failings on others.

tsk tsk.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
More projection and dishonesty?

If your position was so sound, and you weren't all emotional at the moment, you wouldn't need to project your failings on others.

tsk tsk.

noted: you refuse to support your claim that "I made something up". Again, why would anyone get emotional in discussing anything with a know-nothing denier?

A minute ago you were ascribing recent warming was due to the shift of the magnetic poles. Now you're saying it's all made up. That's what it's like arguing with deniers. They just move seamlessly from one incompatblie theory to the next.
-b

the low-brow discourse in this thread speaks volumes about discussing anything with deniers. Clearly, any push-back has them reeling in their denial!