Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
says the guy fronting an attribution that has no legitimate acceptance. But really... you mentioned "Blackleaf" was behind your claimed conspiracy keeping your pet position/theory down. I'm not familiar with "Blackleaf" - please elaborate.
they wouldn't be classified distinct layers if they weren't static. Any idea why?
Temperature, salinity and pressure work together to determine water density ... The ocean waters can be divided into three layers, depending on their densities.
You should be well versed in density.
Temperature, salinity and pressure work together to determine water density ... The ocean waters can be divided into three layers, depending on their densities.
You should be well versed in density.
I'm most appreciative of you stating your acceptance that the ocean has warmed; perhaps some of the other 'buddies' around here will take note. You seem to be going a long way to avoid any suggestion that, under particular conditions, ocean layers mix... why so?
Sure it has warmed and it's impossible to effect climate from depth... Big emphasis on the impossible part.
what is absurd about the statements... these statements:
what's your point in relation to global warming and attribution relative to the relatively recent warming?
You say geomagnetic shift which is currently the biggest geophysical change modern man has ever been part of doesn't exist and can't induce climate change. Can magnetism create heat? Can you do it at home?
BRB I have to warm up my coffee in the microwave.
BRB I have to warm up my coffee in the microwave.
allrightee! In viewing another thread, I note there is a member named Blackleaf... is this who you're claiming is behind your claimed "CO2 conspiracy"? Apparently, you're quick to claim conspiracy, but unwilling/unable to state who/what is behind your claimed conspiracty.
They're an over simplification and fabrication, therefore, absurd. You appear to be trying to fabricate an argument you think you can win.
I didn't say any such thing; however, you can continue to flaunt your pet theory for all it's worth... when the legitimate scientific community accepts it as the principal causal tie behind today's relatively recent warming, then... and only then... will your pet theory have credence.