COVID-19 'Pandemic'

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

JOHNSON & JOHNSON EXPOSED FOR FUNDING FACEBOOK FACT-CHECKERS TO TARGET 'ANTI-VAXXERS'​


Use of fear to control behaviour in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists​

Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about ‘unethical’ methods

Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “unethical” and “totalitarian”...
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
  • Overall, we rate BitChute extreme right and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, propaganda, hate speech, poor sourcing, fake news, and a lack of transparency. This source is not credible for accurate information and may be offensive to some (most).

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, Fake News, Hate Speech
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: United Kingdom (33/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


And the biggest contributor you guessed it ........Alex jones.... the king of conspiracy theories:LOL::ROFLMAO::cry:

And your hero still hasn't learned his lesson huh?


You probably believed him then also!:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,792
3,331
113
U.S. CDC investigating heart problem in few young vaccine recipients
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Publishing date:May 22, 2021 • 20 hours ago • 1 minute read • Join the conversation
A young woman is vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at SZentrum on March 11, 2021 in Schwaz, Austria.
A young woman is vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at SZentrum on March 11, 2021 in Schwaz, Austria. PHOTO BY JAN HETFLEISCH /Getty Images
Article content
Some teenagers and young adults who received COVID-19 vaccines experienced heart inflammation, a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory group said, recommending further study of the rare condition.

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in a statement dated May 17 said it had looked into reports that a few young vaccine recipients, predominantly adolescents and young adults, and predominantly male, developed myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle.


The condition often goes away without complications and can be caused by a variety of viruses, the CDC group said.

CDC monitoring systems had not found more cases than would be expected in the population, but members of the committee on vaccinations felt that healthcare providers should be made aware of the reports of the “potential adverse event,” the committee said in the statement.

It did not say how many people had been affected and recommended further investigation.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The CDC said the cases typically occurred within four days after receiving the mRNA vaccines. It did not specify which vaccines. The United States has given emergency authorization to two mRNA vaccines, from Moderna Inc and Pfizer/BioNTech.


Israel’s Health Ministry in April said it was examining a small number of cases of heart inflammation in people who had received Pfizer’s vaccine, though it had not yet drawn any conclusions. Most of the cases in Israel were reported among people up to age 30.

Pfizer at the time said it had not observed a higher rate of the condition than would normally be the case in the general population and that a causal link to the vaccine had not been established.

Pfizer and Moderna did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Saturday.

The CDC in late April, after news of the Israeli investigation, said it did not see a link between the two.

Earlier this month U.S. regulators expanded authorization of Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,792
3,331
113
Inside the race to find a COVID-19 treatment pill
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Deena Beasley
Publishing date:May 23, 2021 • 2 hours ago • 6 minute read • Join the conversation
An experimental COVID-19 treatment pill, called molnupiravir and being developed by Merck & Co Inc and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP, is seen in this undated handout photo released by Merck & Co Inc and obtained by Reuters May 17, 2021.
An experimental COVID-19 treatment pill, called molnupiravir and being developed by Merck & Co Inc and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP, is seen in this undated handout photo released by Merck & Co Inc and obtained by Reuters May 17, 2021. PHOTO BY MERCK & CO INC / HANDOUT /REUTERS
Article content
LOS ANGELES — In early 2020, as a new deadly coronavirus began spreading around the world, Pfizer Inc assembled what it called a “SWAT team” of scientists and chemists to identify a potential treatment to fight COVID-19.

The U.S. pharmaceutical giant, which had begun exploring a vaccine, also wanted to produce a pill that could stop the infection from progressing, similar to how the widely-used Tamiflu drug fights influenza. The team scoured Pfizer’s library of molecules looking for unused compounds to help jumpstart the process, and quickly identified a promising candidate.


More than a year later, Pfizer has yet to embark on large-scale human trials of a COVID-19 oral treatment – something it says it hopes to start by July.

Pfizer and its rivals, including U.S.-based Merck & Co Inc and Swiss pharmaceutical Roche Holding AG, are racing to produce the first antiviral pill that people could take at early signs of the illness. Their shared goal: filling a key treatment hole by helping people recently-infected with coronavirus to avoid becoming seriously ill and needing hospitalization.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
But after almost 18 months of the pandemic, there is still no easy-to-administer treatment proven to be effective against COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. That is despite the development of a number of effective COVID-19 vaccines, including one from Pfizer and German partner BioNTech SE, which in December became the first to gain authorization for use in the United States.

Pfizer’s experience underscores the challenges drugmakers face in developing an oral treatment for the virus. Unlike a vaccine, which needs only to trigger the body’s own immune system, an effective antiviral pill must block a virus from spreading throughout the body while also being selective enough to avoid interfering with healthy cells.

Testing antivirals is also difficult, drug company executives say. A drug needs to be given early in the course of an infection, which means finding trial participants who have recently contracted COVID-19. Many people infected with the virus develop only mild symptoms, but studies need to prove that a drug has a meaningful impact on patient health.

Pfizer Chief Executive Albert Bourla has said the company could seek emergency authorization in the United States for a COVID-19 pill as soon as late this year.

“Right now we have very good reason to believe that we can be successful,” Bourla told an economic forum in Greece via video conference last week.


Pfizer and its rivals say the development process has been much faster than the several years it typically takes to produce a drug that can be taken as a pill.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Merck and Roche recently started late-stage human trials and have also said their drugs could be ready by later this year. Merck is developing its drug in partnership with biotech Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP and Roche is working with Atea Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Governments around the world have poured billions of dollars into vaccine development, but Pfizer, Merck and Roche say they have not received government funding to develop oral antivirals for the disease.

While the rate of new COVID-19 infections is currently in retreat in some countries, others continue to struggle with a rapid spread of the virus. And with vaccines in short supply in many countries, much of the world will not be vaccinated for several years. Many people also remain reluctant to take vaccines.

Scientists forecast that COVID-19 – which has killed more than 3.5 million people globally – could become a seasonal disease similar to influenza.


“We need a pill that can keep people out of the hospital,” said Dr. Rajesh Gandhi, a professor and infectious disease specialist at Harvard Medical School.

Doctors have tried a number of existing oral drugs in fighting COVID-19, but none of them have succeeded yet in rigorous clinical testing.

Currently, the only treatments shown to help COVID-19 patients avoid hospitalization are antibody drugs that require lengthy intravenous infusions and work less well against variants of the coronavirus.

Pfizer and its rivals say their oral antiviral candidates could be effective against a broad spectrum of coronavirus variants, but no relevant data has been made public.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
For patients already hospitalized with COVID-19, treatment often involves steroids or anti-inflammatory drugs to manage symptoms of the infection, but these medications do not target the virus itself. The only antiviral drug approved in the United States to treat COVID-19 is Gilead Sciences Inc’s remdesivir, which is delivered intravenously and used only for hospitalized patients.

Gilead is currently testing an inhaled form of remdesivir and is exploring other compounds that may be effective oral agents.

“We are all on the hunt for the next Tamiflu,” said Gilead Chief Medical Officer Merdad Parsey.

Tamiflu is recommended for people who have had flu for no more than two days and has been shown to shorten the duration of flu symptoms.

Pfizer’s scientists and chemists began hunting for an antiviral treatment in January last year. They quickly zeroed in on a compound from 2003, when the company had sought a treatment for the first global SARS pandemic, said Charlotte Allerton, Pfizer’s head of medicine design.

The compound belongs to a class known as protease inhibitors, designed to block a key enzyme, or protease, essential to the ability of the coronavirus to multiply. Similar drugs are used to treat other viral infections such as HIV and hepatitis C, both on their own and in combination with other antivirals.

Pfizer’s scientists hit an early stumbling block. Laboratory testing showed the drug candidate was active against the novel coronavirus, known as SARS-CoV-2, but concentrations were not strong enough to combat the virus in humans, Allerton said.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Pfizer continued working with the active component of that compound to formulate a drug that could be given intravenously. But antivirals are most useful if you catch a disease early, “and that isn’t easy with an IV drug,” said Allerton.

In March 2020, Pfizer scientists also started designing a new compound that could be absorbed through the stomach and taken as a pill, which they finalized in July, according to Allerton.

Discovering a protease inhibitor that could be delivered orally was “a bit of a chemistry masterpiece,” said Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Mikael Dolsten.

Antivirals are more complex to develop than vaccines because they have to target the virus after it is already replicating inside human cells, without damaging healthy cells. COVID-19 vaccines typically teach the human immune system to recognize and attack a portion of the “spike” protein that is specific to the coronavirus.

A COVID pill would likely be taken for only a few days, but drugmakers have had to move slowly to ensure safety.

The Merck and Roche drug candidates use different mechanisms to Pfizer’s, and to each other, to disrupt the replication machinery of the virus. But the companies share similar challenges in testing.

One is ensuring a patient receives the drug soon after infection with COVID-19. “It’s all about treating as early in the disease process as possible, when the virus is expanding,” Pfizer’s Dolsten said.

And with vaccination rates high in some regions, trials have to be located in countries where COVID-19 is still on the rise.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
In March of this year, Pfizer began early-stage human trials in the United States of its experimental oral COVID-19 treatment, known as PF-07321332. It followed a separate trial by the company of the intravenous drug started last fall.

Dolsten declined to comment on how the pending late-stage trials of either drug will be structured.

Merck’s antiviral drug candidate, called molnupiravir, recently had a setback. The company said last month it would not pursue its use in hospitalized patients. But Merck said it was moving the drug into late-stage trials of a narrow group of non-hospitalized patients – specifically those who have had symptoms for no more than five days and with at least one risk factor for serious disease, such as advanced age, obesity or diabetes.

Merck said it could have definitive data by September or October.

Roche and its partner Atea are also limiting participation in their recently launched late-stage trial of their AT-527 drug to COVID-19 patients experiencing symptoms for less than five days. Atea said final trial results are expected before the end of this year.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,519
1,111
113
Sad to hear Canada referred to as one of the "rich" countries accused of hoarding vaccine doses given the state of Canada's finances. One of the countries with access to credit would be close to the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

Canadian Doctors Speak Out | Protecting Our Children From Harm​


⁣⁣Canadian Doctors Speak Out | Protecting Our Children FromHarm - May 19, 2021.

The Canada Health Alliance has brought you this new video: Canadian Doctors Speak Out-Protecting Our Children From Harm. Doctors discuss the overestimated risks regarding COVID-19 and the irreversible effects of social distancing and masking mandates on children's education, physical and emotional well-being, as well as their social developmen
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

CANADIAN DOCTORS ARE BEING CENSORED​

AIERvideo, Kate Wand, May 23, 2021

Some may say that we can trust that freedom of speech will be restored and that censorship is necessary to expedite the end of the pandemic. This is abundantly flawed for two reasons. The first being the idea that Canadian doctors must conform to the vision of the state and not question it. This is not only a violation of their duty as medical practitioners and scientists but deeply crippling to a sound public health response.

Finally, this move is fundamentally opposed to the values of liberal democracy which have now been jeopardized on a global scale. With the lights of an enlightened and modern civilization going out across the world, it would be fair to ask, will they ever be turned back on in our lifetime?

"Canadian Doctors Are Being Censored"
Essay by Ethan Yang, editorial Assistant at AIER
https://www.aier.org/article/canadian-doctors-are-being-censored/

Read & Sign the Declaration of Canadian Physicians for Science and Truth:
https://canadianphysicians.org/

Creators: K. Wand & W.G. Gervais


Gee, the GPSO are just like them Bolshevik Maoist Trotskyite apartheid NAZI beaches that did the same type of thing to Alex Jones not to mention the better half of Youtube.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
In March, Governor Greg Abbott announced that Texas would open for business 100 percent without a statewide mask mandate. The pro-lockdown “experts” were shocked. If a state as big as Texas joined Florida and succeeded in thumbing its nose at “the science” – which told us that for the first time in history healthy people should be forced to stay in their houses and wear oxygen-restricting face masks – then the lockdown narrative would begin falling apart.

President Biden famously attacked the decision as “Neanderthal thinking.” Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa warned that, with this order, Abbott would “kill Texans.” Incoming CDC Director Rochelle Walensky tearfully told us about her feelings of “impending doom.”

When the poster child for Covid lockdowns Dr. Fauci was asked several weeks later why cases and deaths continued to evaporate in Texas, he answered simply, “I’m not sure.” That moment may have been a look at the man behind the proverbial curtain, who projected his power so confidently until confronted with reality.

Now a new study appearing as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, highlighted recently in Reason Magazine, has found “no evidence that the reopening affected the rate of new COVID-19 cases in the five-week period following the reopening. …State-level COVID-19 mortality rates were unaffected by the March 10 reopening.”

In other words, not only did the doom and gloom predicted by the lockdown fanatics fail to materialize, but the steady, seasonal downward trend of the virus toward extinction continued regardless of government action. As we have repeated for a year on the Liberty Report, the virus was going to virus regardless of anything we did about it. And Texas proved it.

However, some very important questions remain to be answered as the Covid panic across the United States is finally starting to recede.

First, will anyone be held responsible for the thousands who died because of the prohibition on safe treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin that have since been shown to be effective against Covid-19? As soon as Donald Trump mentioned that hydroxychloroquine might be effective against the virus, the “experts” circled the wagons. It was banned for use, until it later was quietly un-banned.

The politicization of medicine is anti-science, anti-human, and anti-American. Will those who needlessly died due to this politicization finally get their justice?

Second, though Abbott deserves credit for taking the bold step, shouldn’t he be held accountable for closing the state in the first place? After all, when someone has been punching you in the face and then they stop, do you thank them for letting up or do you ask why they punched you in the first place? Will all the tyrannical rule-by-decree orders across the United States be stricken from the books? Or will they just be allowed to do this again for any reason they choose?

Third, thanks to Senator Rand Paul, we are now all aware of Dr. Fauci’s role in funding gain-of-function research on viruses in China. Will we be able to find out exactly why we are being forced to pay for the mad scientist research into how to create more deadly viruses? Can we opt-out of this funding?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
BULLSCH!T:
More alex jones conspiracy bullshite!



I don't take advice on facts from apartheid naughtbars I encounter on the internet who can't even do 2+2=4.
;)

...especially those that channel epstien the pharma banker pedo.


FACT:

Internet AGAIN Admits “Alex Jones Was Right” After Newsweek Piece on Vampire-like Blood Transfusion Life Extension Technology​

'You know, I hate to admit it, but everyday that passes Alex Jones looks less crazy.'​


 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,435
1,825
113

Valerie Vaz (Lab, Walsall South) Claims Boris Johnson Wasn't Knocking On 💀 Door As Originally Reported​

 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

lets go for the DOUBLE STOMP!​

:)

Fauci Says COVID Lab Leak Possible, Media In FULL Panic Mode, Stealth Editing, Retracting "Debunks"​

Fauci Says COVID Lab Leak Possible, Media In FULL Panic Mode, Stealth Editing, Retracting "Debunks." Media claimed Republicans, Tucker Carlson, and even other journalists were pushing debunked theories.

Now as more news comes out about covid and the wuhan lab the idea of a lab leak has become mainstream.

While democrats and media were adamant on claiming anything trump said is a lie, the world suffered for it.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Triple STOMP!
:)

Politifact Forced To Admit “Debunked” Means Nothing

As the lab leak origin begins to regain it's initial supremacy as the mainline theory, Politifact is forced to take back it's knee-jerk dismissal of the most the plausible theory of the origin of Covid-19
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,

Nutbars like you will believe in any conspiracy especialy when it comes from the head conspiracy nut alex jones!​

Search Results for https://www.brighteon.com/




Brighteon

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is…
Read More





Natural News

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore,…




News Target

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore…
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

Do the funeral homes have more business in 2020​


On air calls to funeral homes in Canada...and the answer is No

Sleepy and every one in the "kill 90% of the people off death cult" are all totally 100% full of it.

re fact checkers:

Lying PolitiFact Lies About Biden’s Own Words on Raising Taxes​


'Fact Checkers' twisting themselves in knots to cover for Biden's lies​



'LYING FOR DEMOCRATS'

Candace Owens wins challenge against ‘communist’ Facebook fact-checker Politifact over Biden post false rating​


FACEBOOK WHISTLEBLOWERS LEAK DOCS DETAILING EFFORT TO SECRETLY CENSOR VAX CONCERNS ON GLOBAL SCALE​


:)
The BoilShoot never stops with them.
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113

They're Really Sinking Their Teeth Into Us Now As The 'Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Theorists' Are Proven Right Once Again​

- Vaccine Passports, Social Credit Scores And 'The Great Reset' Being Unveiled Before Our Very Eyes​


I think someone is going to sleepeepeep their pantys again
;)
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Grow up dude or and read something else beside alex jones!
I knew you were a real nutbar when I first read your theory about holograms hitting the twin towers on 9/11
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,939
7,682
113
B.C.
Grow up dude or and read something else beside alex jones!
I knew you were a real nutbar when I first read your theory about holograms hitting the twin towers on 9/11
Why not admit your fact checkers are just as biased ? Mainstream media are biased , why wouldn’t their fact checkers hold that same bias ?