Climate Debate Should Stick to Facts
- Thread starter I think not
- Start date
The inevitable thrashing of the CERNophiles.. Enjoy!
Are cosmic rays causing global warming? - YouTube
Are cosmic rays causing global warming? - YouTube
We're supposed to take these guys seriously, right????
Climate Minister buys a castle with 16 bathrooms... and a massive carbon footprint | Mail Online
Uh-huh.
Climate Minister buys a castle with 16 bathrooms... and a massive carbon footprint | Mail Online
Uh-huh.
Politicians? You may need to get your head examined Colpy...
Though I'm amused by your red herring post in a thread titled "Climate debate should stick to facts"
Kudos! :lol:
Okay....let's talk about the scientists!!!
Uh oh, global warming loons: here comes Climategate II! – Telegraph Blogs
Yup.
This is who we should be trusting.
Uh huh.
There is a cure for global warming fanaticism. It's called the snow shovel. Today NS could be buried in the first snow storm of the season.
Indeed, quite so. What the two things have to do with each other, I don't know, but if it works for you, keep on with it.
I'm sorry, I'm too often guilty of assuming the reading public shares the same drug induced visions that afflict me. The snow shovel has clarified the thinking of the confused before. I used to be a strong supporter of global warming, I even did things to add to the carbon load and I did it fully expecting to reap the benefits of the promised heat wave. I can't forgive them.
Okay....let's talk about the scientists!!!
Uh oh, global warming loons: here comes Climategate II! – Telegraph Blogs
Yup.
This is who we should be trusting.
Uh huh.
So to review, more emails taken out of context with selective quote mining. All investigations have cleared the scientists of fraud and scientific misconduct. Much more ado about nothing.
+1 for denier propaganda, -10 for reason.
It is a case of what I said in the WWII thread - people cannot accept any info that does not fit in with their preconceived ideas of reality. "I'm right, you are wrong." A sure sign that the ego is in control.
Well they don't have many tricks left. Bad surface temperature stations have been ruled out. Urban heat island ruled out. A skeptic analyzes surface temperature data and confirms it is correct. They start cherry picking trend start dates to say no warming has occurred. It's fallacious stats.
Their arguments against observations are repeatedly shot down, which perversely enforces more faulty beliefs like Colpy's.
