Climate change threatens to strip identity of Glacier National Park
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Can I get one of those at Staples?
Who in hell wants to visit an ice covered park after spending the winter cursing the stuff?
USGS maintains a repeat photography project that documents glacier retreat; there are many, many photos of receding glaciers within Glacier National Park... going back, typically, 50 to 100 years and comparing them to, typically, images from 2005-2009
as below, a prior post showing Arctic long-term melting trends for sea-ice extent and volume:
speaking of "recovery" based on a single year reference is nonsense... notwithstanding the context with Extent is single versus multi-year ice. Single year ice is that ice most readily melted in the next year's melting season. Following are the trend lines for both Extent and Volume... for an appropriate perspective on Arctic sea-ice.
Antarctic ice-shelves are not advancing. What has increased is sea-ice extent... which is being attributed to, in part, the freezing of fresh-water melt from land-ice sheets. Of course, if you're not aware, Antarctic sea-ice melts (almost completely) each and every year... that is to say, the concept of multi-year sea-ice in the Antarctic does not exist in the same manner as currently found in areas of the Arctic.
this is somewhat novel! To you, just what is your indicated "AGW industry"?
whaaa! Say it ain't so... say you're not yet another "coming out of the LIA" guy! :lol: It's a shame that another of your pet theory's has no scientific credence!
and you're nothing but a blowhard; a failed claimed "earth scientist"... now gone emeritus! :lol: Both your links blew-up on you - big time! Blowed up, real good!
SCTV Farm Report Celebrity Blow Up ( He Blowed Up Real Good ) - YouTube
These warmista attacks are getting stupid, it's like earwicks or roaches swarming out of some establishment garbage dump.
you couldn't intelligently discuss a single related subject... you choose to remain in denial... simply for denials sake! It's your comfort zone! You don't know why you like it... you just feel better without all that factual sciency stuff getting in your way. That's why you revert to your strengths in dropping your cutesy images. I expect it's the only way you're able to actually contribute to these threads... isn't it?
been there, done that!
play nice... take your free shots... I'm going walkabout now! :lol: Maybe CU tomorrow!
NRC public research says..... Sunspots Drive Glacier Movement - Current Results
From
http://www.sfu.ca/cnhr/papers/Koch et al. CJES.pdf
From
http://www.sfu.ca/cnhr/papers/Koch et al. CJES.pdf
OK see you tomorrow. Watch out for icey driving conditions and don't forget your mittens.
The beer and I will curl up with those this evening.
Speaking of evening it started here half an hour ago, in ten minute or so it will be dark. 4:27pm
No, like the evidence indicates that the glaciers in Glacier National Park are receding.
In science the statement "Expert A was wrong about Prediction A therefore Expert B is wrong about Evidence B" is not logically coherent.
You'd think so. But then there's all your posts in "our cooling world."
I suppose it is. Myself, I don't think you should be anti-AGW or pro-AGW. I think you should follow the path the evidence takes you. Like most on here, your opposition to AGW is primarily ideological.