Climate Change Deniers Are Actively Harming Our Children’s Future

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Climate Change Deniers Are Actively Harming Our Children’s Future



LIFESAVING WORK

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is of monumental importance. It literally saves lives. If you need proof, the Health Effects Institute (HEI) recently concluded that air pollution killed an estimated 4.2 million people worldwide in 2015 alone, with 2.2 million of those deaths in China and India.

The EPA was established in 1970 by President Richard Nixon to assist in the battle against precisely this pollution.

In the United States, the 70s were an era plagued by smog—smog that rivaled the conditions of present-day Beijing in terms of air health. In his State of the Union address, President Nixon said, “Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country.”

And so, the EPA was born.

Now, you can get a hardcover copy of their graphics, and you can also help save the environment. According to a release from the EPA, their manual “beautifully encapsulates how design can be used to advance federal programs for public good,” and now, you can own it.

TOWARD THE CAUSE

Similar to other campaigns that aim to more widely release standards manuals, like the ones centering on New York City Transit Authority and NASA, a Kickstarter campaign has been started to fund the wider release of the EPA’s traditional hardcover manuals.

As of writing, the campaign has already garnered nearly $48,000 in backing, with more than a month left in the campaign. With as little as $79, design nerds can own a piece of history and have it delivered directly to them by the end of October.

Even better, as was mentioned, a portion of the proceeds will go to “Earthjustice’s programmatic expenses in their mission to protect the environment.” The organization is the nation’s original and largest nonprofit environmental law organization, and it has been going to bat for the environment for decades.

Those behind the project note that the funding will help to mitigate the repeals and harmful environmental policies put in place by the recent administration. As a rallying cry, the organization stated: “As Scott Pruitt spouts fossil fuel industry talking points and asks people to share horror stories about crucial public health safeguards, let’s tell the real stories about environmental protections that have improved our lives.”

Not only does supporting the campaign get you a piece of our nation’s history, it will also show how much you support federal agencies and programs that, quite literally, save (and enrich) our lives.

source: https://futurism.com/climate-change-deniers-are-actively-harming-our-childrens-future/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6CPsGanO_U
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Fortunately, most of the world seems top be ignoring the climate change deniers as green tech continues to grow.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Climate Change Deniers Are Actively Harming Our Children’s Future



LIFESAVING WORK

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is of monumental importance. It literally saves lives. If you need proof, the Health Effects Institute (HEI) recently concluded that air pollution killed an estimated 4.2 million people worldwide in 2015 alone, with 2.2 million of those deaths in China and India.

The EPA was established in 1970 by President Richard Nixon to assist in the battle against precisely this pollution.

In the United States, the 70s were an era plagued by smog—smog that rivaled the conditions of present-day Beijing in terms of air health. In his State of the Union address, President Nixon said, “Restoring nature to its natural state is a cause beyond party and beyond factions. It has become a common cause of all the people of this country.”

And so, the EPA was born.

Now, you can get a hardcover copy of their graphics, and you can also help save the environment. According to a release from the EPA, their manual “beautifully encapsulates how design can be used to advance federal programs for public good,” and now, you can own it.

TOWARD THE CAUSE

Similar to other campaigns that aim to more widely release standards manuals, like the ones centering on New York City Transit Authority and NASA, a Kickstarter campaign has been started to fund the wider release of the EPA’s traditional hardcover manuals.

As of writing, the campaign has already garnered nearly $48,000 in backing, with more than a month left in the campaign. With as little as $79, design nerds can own a piece of history and have it delivered directly to them by the end of October.

Even better, as was mentioned, a portion of the proceeds will go to “Earthjustice’s programmatic expenses in their mission to protect the environment.” The organization is the nation’s original and largest nonprofit environmental law organization, and it has been going to bat for the environment for decades.

Those behind the project note that the funding will help to mitigate the repeals and harmful environmental policies put in place by the recent administration. As a rallying cry, the organization stated: “As Scott Pruitt spouts fossil fuel industry talking points and asks people to share horror stories about crucial public health safeguards, let’s tell the real stories about environmental protections that have improved our lives.”

Not only does supporting the campaign get you a piece of our nation’s history, it will also show how much you support federal agencies and programs that, quite literally, save (and enrich) our lives.

source: https://futurism.com/climate-change-deniers-are-actively-harming-our-childrens-future/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6CPsGanO_U



They're going to print off..... as in on paper.... thousands? 10's of thousands? 100's of thousands copies of this "manual"? Oh ya, that's gotta be good for the "environment". While the vast majority have gone paperless, have warnings against printing off emails to be more environmentally friendly, these "environmentalists" are doing the exact opposite.

:roll:
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Fortunately, most of the world seems top be ignoring the climate change deniers as green tech continues to grow.
You mean as the subsidy grab continues to grow. In case after case where "green" subsidies were removed, sales suffered dramatic losses. In Denmark, sales of ECV and plug-in hybrids plunged 60.5% in the first quarter of this year.

If we look at green energy generation, the IEA noted that wind power installations soared in China as builders rushed to meet a deadline for high priced power contracts, and then fell by nearly half in 2016. Why? The subsidies ended.
“Global investments in renewable energy fell by almost a quarter in 2016 amid a drop in prices and lower spending in some markets, according to a U.N.-backed report published Thursday.”
The reality remains in the markets where governments reduced generous financial support for solar, wind and electric vehicles, sales have plummeted. New European solar installations dropped by one-third in 2016 as several countries reduced high prices for purchased power.

An end to heavy subsidies and mandates might not cause the near-disappearance of these industries as in the past, but some serious retrenchment is a real possibility and it’s puzzling that so many are treating that as impossible.

Pretty soon you boneheads will realize that wind power sucks ass. Why do you think industry gave up on it for any real heavy lifting? It's just not efficient enough. Now I know you'll say that technology today is well beyond anything they had in those days but it really doesn't help much.
We are at the limit of wind turbine technology and efficiency and the returns still aren't worth it. All power plants, including wind farms, have a rated capacity. Traditional power plants generally operate at 40-60% capacity although that can be increased as the need arises. Wind farms, at best, operate at 25% of their capacity with the major drawback that you can't increase that as the need arises. So when it's announced that such and such a place has installed 8000MW of wind power, the reality is they'll only ever be able to access about 2000MW of that at any given time.

There are other questions you need to ask yourself. If we move to a completely green energy power grid, what are we going to use for base-load generation? After eliminating fossil fuels you're left with two options. 1) Hope to hell your local geography has a sizable hydroelectric potential, or 2) go nuclear. Keep in mind also that new hydroelectric projects ain't exactly environmentally friendly. Next question. If we move to a completely green power grid, what are we going to use for flexibility? We can't keep using methane (natgas) if the purpose is to reduce GHGs.

The push for green energy by industry is a push for subsidies. The push for green energy by the average moron is proof that the average moron has no concept of physics or electric power systems and how they operate.
Maybe instead of running around like a bunch of hysterical faggots screaming that the sky is falling, they should try engaging that grey matter twixt their ears and actually think (pardon the exaggeration) it through. Other than that, if you don't like dealing with reality, that's fine. Just quit expecting everyone else to play along with your stupid, uneducated delusions.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
You don't have to believe in the "global warming" religion to be against Pollution (Air, water etc..)
I agree, but when dealing with power generation the issues are still pretty much the same. You need base-load generation and flexibility. Wind and solar are capable of neither.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Climate change truthers are actively destroying our economy and the well being of future generations. Somehow they have managed to change the message from"clean up your shit" to economic activity and prosperity in the west is evil.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
It's all freakin over for "mann maid" right here:

Report: Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann – ‘Commits contempt of court’
Report: Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael
Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael

Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination. Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S. The defendant in the libel trial, the 79-year-old Canadian climatologist, Dr Tim Ball (above, right) is expected to instruct his British Columbia attorneys to trigger mandatory punitive court sanctions, including a ruling that Mann did act with criminal intent when using public funds to commit climate data fraud.



Maurice Strong, Climate Crook

The consummate sleazebag, thief and all-round corruptocrat who launched and shaped the UN effort to rid the world of CO2 has died, appropriately enough as his heirs gather in Paris to rob the world blind. Good riddance

Maurice Strong described himself as “a socialist in ideology, a capitalist in methodology”.

Maurice Strong, Climate Crook — Quadrant Online

There you have the DEMOCRATIC party/socialist/communist/fascist agenda:
Antifact, antiscience, antigun, antifa, antiperson...ANTILIFE
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
We haven't given a fuk about the children. Ever. And why is it you think we are going to start too now? We borrowed trillions of billions on the perceived belief that our kids will pay for it.

Every generation worsens in economic success and life quality since we have started borrowing.

My parents didn't give a fuk about me. And i have no plans on giving a fuk ether.

Giving a fuk is a privilege only people that have everything already have. The rest of us are too close to bankruptcy, and need to constantly focus on surviving a other week.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Yeah I get it all the old folks in their depends underwear don't want to take responsibility for their part in ****ing up the earth for the next generation...

The only blessing is the Circle of Life... the next generation will be better care tenders...


No comment concerning my reply to the op?
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
You mean as the subsidy grab continues to grow. In case after case where "green" subsidies were removed, sales suffered dramatic losses. In Denmark, sales of ECV and plug-in hybrids plunged 60.5% in the first quarter of this year.

If we look at green energy generation, the IEA noted that wind power installations soared in China as builders rushed to meet a deadline for high priced power contracts, and then fell by nearly half in 2016. Why? The subsidies ended.
“Global investments in renewable energy fell by almost a quarter in 2016 amid a drop in prices and lower spending in some markets, according to a U.N.-backed report published Thursday.”
The reality remains in the markets where governments reduced generous financial support for solar, wind and electric vehicles, sales have plummeted. New European solar installations dropped by one-third in 2016 as several countries reduced high prices for purchased power.

An end to heavy subsidies and mandates might not cause the near-disappearance of these industries as in the past, but some serious retrenchment is a real possibility and it’s puzzling that so many are treating that as impossible.

Pretty soon you boneheads will realize that wind power sucks ass. Why do you think industry gave up on it for any real heavy lifting? It's just not efficient enough. Now I know you'll say that technology today is well beyond anything they had in those days but it really doesn't help much.
We are at the limit of wind turbine technology and efficiency and the returns still aren't worth it. All power plants, including wind farms, have a rated capacity. Traditional power plants generally operate at 40-60% capacity although that can be increased as the need arises. Wind farms, at best, operate at 25% of their capacity with the major drawback that you can't increase that as the need arises. So when it's announced that such and such a place has installed 8000MW of wind power, the reality is they'll only ever be able to access about 2000MW of that at any given time.

There are other questions you need to ask yourself. If we move to a completely green energy power grid, what are we going to use for base-load generation? After eliminating fossil fuels you're left with two options. 1) Hope to hell your local geography has a sizable hydroelectric potential, or 2) go nuclear. Keep in mind also that new hydroelectric projects ain't exactly environmentally friendly. Next question. If we move to a completely green power grid, what are we going to use for flexibility? We can't keep using methane (natgas) if the purpose is to reduce GHGs.

The push for green energy by industry is a push for subsidies. The push for green energy by the average moron is proof that the average moron has no concept of physics or electric power systems and how they operate.
Maybe instead of running around like a bunch of hysterical faggots screaming that the sky is falling, they should try engaging that grey matter twixt their ears and actually think (pardon the exaggeration) it through. Other than that, if you don't like dealing with reality, that's fine. Just quit expecting everyone else to play along with your stupid, uneducated delusions.

Lost the argument before you began didn't you? I always know when someone is not sure of his facts by the number of insults he slings out. But I will attempt to give you an insult free answer.

I'll concede your point when subsidies to green energy match those given to the oil and coal industries. That would be sometime around 2167 as oil and coal have a 150 year head start. Interestingly green tech is now so advanced that it is cheaper than conventional energy sources and despite weak claims to the contrary it is also much cleaner. And I find it interesting that you focus so much on the limits of wind power. These are all well known and there are so many solutions to these problems almost certainly all of these shortcomings will be overcome. You also overlook the fact that green tech is much more than just production of energy. It is also about using energy more efficiently. As an example LED lighting has pretty much made incandescents and even fluorescents obsolete.

BTW your example of Denmark is pure cherry picking as green tech is much more than just electric cars, but since you brought it up these are the auto manufacturers who are now producing electric cars. Do they know something you don't?

Top 10 US electric car companies
Top 10 US electric car companies | Top 10 | Business Review USA
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
In case you were not reading citations again,( of course you weren't, they are rational) MM Global warming has been destroyed by the court case won by Canada's senior climatologist Tim Ball against the data falsifier Michael Mann, whose fake hockey stick temperature graph(illustrated above in the links you didn't read) has been totally discredited, as have been ALL your mathematical models, whose predictions you use as EVIDENCE to illustrate a complete untruth which YOU believe.
;)
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
In case you were not reading citations again,( of course you weren't, they are rational) MM Global warming has been destroyed by the court case won by Canada's senior climatologist Tim Ball against the data falsifier Michael Mann, whose fake hockey stick temperature graph(illustrated above in the links you didn't read) has been totally discredited, as have been ALL your mathematical models, whose predictions you use as EVIDENCE to illustrate a complete untruth which YOU believe.
;)


And once again I don't care. Green tech is increasing. Whether it is needed or not is irrelevant.