bring it with ya then...actually I do not believe hell is warm but hey, we can all play along ;-)
Well in that case I'd be depending on you to provide the warmth.
bring it with ya then...actually I do not believe hell is warm but hey, we can all play along ;-)
Based on Matthew 25:31-46, I'd put the figure north of 99%.
I'm thinking not.Matthew 25: says there will be more sheep in heaven because the goats will be destroyed. Is sheep a code word for Australians because of their affinity for sheep. Just asking......!!!
No need to use your imagination.bring it with ya then...actually I do not believe hell is warm but hey, we can all play along ;-)
he will plead with all flesh;
he will give them that are wicked to the sword,
saith the LORD.
Thus saith the LORD of hosts,
Behold,
evil shall go forth from nation to nation,
and a great whirlwind shall be raised up from the coasts of the earth.
And the slain of the LORD shall be at that day from one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth:
they shall not be lamented,
neither gathered,
nor buried;
they shall be dung upon the ground.
Eze:39:6:
And I will send a fire on Magog,
and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles:
and they shall know that I am the LORD.
To get the ratio up there God uses a few terms in the NT that allow Him to include way more that 2/3 of the world's population, terms like 'busy bodies' cover a lot of people not connected to armies.
No, the ratio is 2/3 goats and 1/3 sheep. The place prepared for Satan and the fallen angels is hell, it is a holding area before they are sent to the fiery lake. The Beast from the Pit and the 4 angels released for the 5th and 6th trump have been in there since the flood and they can be sent to the lake and they are at the return. Satan hasn't been to hell that is why he is sent there for the 1,000 years instead of being sent straight to the lake. As a side-note since members of this board would see at least a few go to hell there are able to witness their old boss in chains and they can rightfully mock him. When Satan is let out the gates of hell remain locked so no men end up in the lake and when they are released at the Great White Throne they are sinless so God is able to offer them a drink of living water and they get to use free-will do drink or not. The 'nots' would then get sent to the fiery lake, a longer version of what they experienced in hell so nobody will pass up on the water offer)In our day, "the 99%" self-identify as the underprivileged majority in global income/wealth. I wonder if correlation exists between personal material destitution and personal spiritual poverty. Will "the 1%" triumph twice - in the material world and in eternity? Do the scriptures support this outcome?
"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. 'Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ 'Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?' 'The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ 'Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ 'They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ 'He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ 'Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” (Matthew 25:31-46 NIV)
In our day, "the 99%" self-identify as the underprivileged majority in global income/wealth. I wonder if correlation exists between personal material destitution and personal spiritual poverty. Will "the 1%" triumph twice - in the material world and in eternity? Do the scriptures support this outcome?
That means all the donations to the Churches won't get you a seat in the 1,000 year reign, it actually eliminates the possibility of them being able to be there. The 7 letters to the 7 Churches define who gets to be called a sheep and who gets to be called a goat. The qualifications are easy enough to understand on the very first read. Peter also expands on how to tell the difference, so does Paul so ignorance can't be claimed.
1Pe:4:12-18:
Beloved,
think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you,
as though some strange thing happened unto you:
But rejoice,
inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings;
that,
when his glory shall be revealed,
ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.
If ye be reproached for the name of Christ,
happy are ye;
for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you:
on their part he is evil spoken of,
but on your part he is glorified.
But let none of you suffer as a murderer,
or as a thief,
or as an evildoer,
or as a busybody in other men's matters.
Yet if any man suffer as a Christian,
let him not be ashamed;
but let him glorify God on this behalf.
For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God:
and if it first begin at us,
what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?
And if the righteous scarcely be saved,
where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?
Ro:13:6-9:
For for this cause pay ye tribute also:
for they are God's ministers,
attending continually upon this very thing.
Render therefore to all their dues:
tribute to whom tribute is due;
custom to whom custom;
fear to whom fear;
honour to whom honour.
Owe no man any thing,
but to love one another:
for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
For this,
Thou shalt not commit adultery,
Thou shalt not kill,
Thou shalt not steal,
Thou shalt not bear false witness,
Thou shalt not covet;
and if there be any other commandment,
it is briefly comprehended in this saying,
namely,
Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Your question has nothing to do with the text. It says not a word about wealth or poverty. I speaks of feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, clothing the naked, taking in the homeless, and comforting the sick and imprisoned. And it says those who do these things will have live eternal, and those who do not do these things will have everlasting punishment.In our day, "the 99%" self-identify as the underprivileged majority in global income/wealth. I wonder if correlation exists between personal material destitution and personal spiritual poverty. Will "the 1%" triumph twice - in the material world and in eternity? Do the scriptures support this outcome?
When 2/3 are destined to be classified as unbelievers (un-repented) why would you think there is any demand that the book gather anybody at all? The number isn't set to be examined before the 7th trump rather than the first. The book is there to satisfy the verse below. The 2nd verse shows the earth can be engulfed in flames before the first trump sounds, the numbers for the last part is giveb as a ration. 6.66B would be the number we would use at this current date, The world's population can be as low as 660,000 people and prophecy can still unfold. There is no demand that it even be 'understood, after all that is what a delusion does.Odd that none of the verses quoted makes it mandatory to believe in the sacrificial lamb (Jesus).
The bolded part are a reflex action for those who understand and accept the words in the NT (and the OT as a supporting document) That would make you a sheep and put you into the first gathering, one that grace covers all their sins. The other ones are still gathered to God at the GWT and they also enter the new earth as residents that make their homes outside of New Jerusalem, the ones who are not punished by death and the ones resurrected for the 1,000 year reign live inside New Jerusalem in the new earth. That is the whole difference as coming from the God of the living.Your question has nothing to do with the text. It says not a word about wealth or poverty. I speaks of feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, clothing the naked, taking in the homeless, and comforting the sick and imprisoned. And it says those who do these things will have live eternal, and those who do not do these things will have everlasting punishment.
There is not one single word about having or not having money.
Your question has nothing to do with the text. It says not a word about wealth or poverty. I speaks of feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, clothing the naked, taking in the homeless, and comforting the sick and imprisoned. And it says those who do these things will have live eternal, and those who do not do these things will have everlasting punishment. There is not one single word about having or not having money.
I love Christian "scholarship," because it seems like the whole intent of it is to obscure Jesus's two-step instructions for getting into heaven:Here is another similar instruction concerning the love of money and indifference towards others, TB:
"Just then a (rich) man came up to Jesus and asked, 'Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?' 'Why do you ask me about what is good?' Jesus replied. 'There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.' 'Which ones?' he inquired. Jesus replied, 'You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,’ and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’
'All these I have kept,' the young man said. 'What do I still lack?' Jesus answered, 'If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.' When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth." (Matthew 16:19-22 NIV)
1. Believe in him. 2. Be good to people.
Plenty of not-rich folk don't keep it neither. Yet every swingin' d*ck of 'em is firmly convinced Saint Peter's just holding the Pearly Gates wide open for 'em.You've summed up the law and the prophets well, TB. Notice how "believe in him" precedes "be good to people". You will find this fundamental spiritual order throughout the Scriptures. It is impossible to keep the second admonishment without observing the first.
Jesus highlighted the "be good to people" admonishment to the rich young man, who claimed to keep it. His lifestyle stated otherwise.
His lifestyle did qualify him, it was his reluctance to let material wealth to go to the poor that kept him out of being in the Re:20:4 gathering, it doesn't keep him out of the Great White Throne gathering. The ones sent to the grave are kept in the grave when Satan is released with all the fallen angels so none of them end up in the lake.His lifestyle stated otherwise.
Plenty of not-rich folk don't keep it neither. Yet every swingin' d*ck of 'em is firmly convinced Saint Peter's just holding the Pearly Gates wide open for 'em. Oh, it also wasn't an admonition. It was a condition for everlasting life. Anyone who argues that must have at least a master's in theology. Or be ordained.