China executes British citizen for drug smuggling

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
In the ADX in Florence, Colorado. The U.S.'s supermax for terrorists, and crimes with a political cachet. 23 Hours a day in solitary, no socializing period with other prisoners, no view of the mountains, no respite from the routine.The Americans are as ruthless as the Chinese in meting out payback for slights to their propriety, maybe more so. Think i'd just as soon have the bullet in the back of the neck. :roll:



Total agreement with you. Prisons are a little nicer though still no matter how nice still a prison. I wouldn't mind if the terrorists were put in with the regular prison population.;-)
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
i could never allow a terrorist to be put in general population, its bad enough egeneral population knows how to make weapons out of wet newspapers and paper towel rolls... Dont need no terrorist kicking a science lesson
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Nobody has mentioned it lately, but we have a major open drug war going on just over the Mexican border that occasionally crosses into the U.S. They had more causalities last year than we had in Iraq. The drug cartels are taking on the Mexican army directly and seem to be at least holding their own.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
i could never allow a terrorist to be put in general population, its bad enough egeneral population knows how to make weapons out of wet newspapers and paper towel rolls... Dont need no terrorist kicking a science lesson

Prisoners do not like terrorists, terrorists would not last long.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Now China should execute all those who bring, grow, import and promote TOBACCO in China.

Y.J. I'm really beginning to wonder if there is any hope for you. China is finally doing the right thing with these dope pushers/importers and now you go off half cocked and want half the population executed. Is there a good Shrink where you live? :lol::lol:
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Gotta challenge you on that one....

Have you never smoked cigarettes, drank alcohol????

Both are drugs, and are much more harmful than some of the illegal ones.

Law is simply policy, and like policy, it often makes no sense.


I was only referring to the so called hard stuff, heroin, opium coke etc. Cigarettes and alcohol are not in the same category (despite what some may think, they are not as physically addictive), though can be just as deadly.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I was only referring to the so called hard stuff, heroin, opium coke etc. Cigarettes and alcohol are not in the same category (despite what some may think, they are not as physically addictive), though can be just as deadly.
Most addicts will tell you it is easier to kick heroin than it is to kick cigarettes. Many more people die from cigarettes and alcohol than all other drugs put together, so I think you need to revise your opinion there.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"Y.J. I'm really beginning to wonder if there is any hope for you. China is finally doing the right thing with these dope pushers/importers and now you go off half cocked and want half the population executed. Is there a good Shrink where you live? :lol::lol:"

JLM, just as I did not want all the drug addicts executed, only the pushers, I would be satisfied to execute those who push tobacco. Addicton to tobacco is worse and more destructive than any other addiction.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Most addicts will tell you it is easier to kick heroin than it is to kick cigarettes. Many more people die from cigarettes and alcohol than all other drugs put together, so I think you need to revise your opinion there.

I agree that more people die from cigarettes and alcohol now than all drugs mentioned, but cigarettes and alcohol do not cause the violent crimes that the drugs cause. Legalizing those drugs will not save lives either, just more people will become addicted, overdose and of course die. Thereby the death rate of drug use may that of exceed cigarettes and alcohol.

Why is it fairly easy for someone who wants to quit smoking, just stop? I also ask why is it hard for others to quit?

It is almost impossible for a heroin addict to quit cold turkey.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
[SIZE=+1]Fury as China executes 'mentally ill' Briton[/SIZE]
China National News
Tuesday 29th December, 2009
(IANS)

Britain reacted with fury Tuesday as China refused to heed pleas for pardon and executed a convicted Briton who is thought to be mentally ill.

Pakistan-born Akmal Shaikh, who was arrested at Urumqi airport in September 2007 for carrying four kg of heroin, became the first European to be executed by China in 50 years.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Foreign Secretary David Miliband led strong condemnations of the Chinese action, which came despite pleas that Shaikh was suffering from a form of bipolar disorder with delusions of pop stardom.

'I condemn the execution of Akmal Shaikh in the strongest terms, and am appalled and disappointed that our persistent requests for clemency have not been granted. I am particularly concerned that no mental health assessment was undertaken,' Brown said.

Miliband expressed outrage that 'specific concerns about the individual in this case were not taken into consideration despite repeated calls by the Prime Minister, Ministerial colleagues and me. These included mental health issues, and inadequate professional interpretation during the trial'.

'This is not about how much we hate the drug trade. Britain as well as China are completely committed to take it on. The issue is whether Mr Shaikh has become an additional victim of it.'

The European Union had also repeatedly raised the same concerns.

Shaikh, 53-year-old father of three, was executed by lethal injection despite frantic last-minute pleas for clemency by the British foreign ministry.

Prime Minister Brown had personally raised the issue with the Chinese premier at the Copenhagen summit and the British foreign ministry later summoned the Chinese ambassador for what was described by the media a 'diplomatic dressing down'.

The anti-death-penalty organisation Reprieve said it had medical evidence that Shaikh believed he was going to China in 2007 to record a hit single that would usher in world peace. It said he was duped into carrying a suitcase packed with heroin on a flight from Tajikistan to Urumqi.

But the ambassador claimed the Chinese judiciary was independent of the government and that the country's supreme court had made its decision
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
[SIZE=+1]Shaikh's execution unlikely to damage Sino-UK ties[/SIZE]
China National News
Tuesday 29th December, 2009
(ANI)

London/Beijing, Dec. 29 : Britisher Akmal Shaikh's execution in China on Wednesday for drug smuggling is unlikely to damage Sino-UK ties in the long term.

Shaikh's execution, despite repeated pleas for clemency by Prime Minister Gordon Brown to President Hu Jintao, though will do nothing to improve the mood between the two countries, reports The Telegraph.

A British Embassy spokesman in Beijing described Shaikh's death sentence as a "significant issue".

It is more likely that Beijing saw the case as a question of law. China has a zero-tolerance policy towards anyone, whether Chinese or foreign, caught smuggling drugs.

While Shaikh's family and the British government believed that his mental health problems were grounds for mercy to be shown to him, China pointed to the nine pounds of heroin he was arrested with. Under Chinese criminal law, that's 80 times the amount someone can be put to death for.

Given that evidence, it was always unlikely that Hu Jintao would break with precedent and commute Shaikh's sentence, even if his execution is unlikely to deter future drug smugglers.

Nor does Beijing agree with the British government's opposition to the death penalty.

On the contrary, there is overwhelming support among the Chinese people for its use.

It's one of the reasons why China executes more people than any other country in the world -- 1718 in 2008 according to Amnesty International.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Why is it that people like drug smugglers think they can use a mentally ill defense. He got what he deserved, a quick death. "China pointed to the nine pounds of heroin he was arrested with. Under Chinese criminal law, that's 80 times the amount someone can be put to death for." there is no excuse.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,063
1,919
113
Britain is a country which worships celebrities who take drugs. Kate Moss and Pete Docherty are treated as Gods by a celebrity-obsessed public, and their drug-taking antics are let off lightly by lenient courts. So it comes as no surprise that the left-wing British government is up in arms about this execution, despite the fact that Shaikh's links to Britain are tenuous. He was born in Pakistan, lived in the US for years before moving to Poland.

A similar case occurred in the US in 2002. The British government were furious that a "British citizen", Tracy Lee Housel, was about to be executed by the state of Georgia despite the fact that he robbed and raped a woman before strangling her and crushing her head. Housel was actually from Bermuda and had never stepped foot in Britain in his life.

The British government is obsessed with human rights (of criminals, not victims) and has signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights. However, no country outside of Europe is signed up to the Convention.

Instead of harping on to the Chinese and Americans of respecting the human rights of accused drug smugglers and murderers, maybe the British Government should take an equally firm stance as the Chinese and Yanks and re-introduce the death penalty for such people.

"Britain is completely opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances", said David "Banana Boy" Miliband. Maybe someone should tell him that 90% of the Chinese people are for it.
 
Last edited:

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
That's a good thing- that is the only way we are going to get rid of that problem and the penalties have to be consistent world wide. I have zero tolerance for any of that sh*t.

I am of the oposing view with similar extremity: I have total total tolerance for all of it. I think he should have been running a taxable business. That is the only way we are going to get rid of that problem and the regulations have to be consistent world wide.
 

jsiooa

Time Out
Aug 5, 2009
123
2
18
And another druggie is gone. He deserved what happened to him.


His supporters argued that Shaikh was mentally ill, and that Chinese officials did not take his mental condition into account when trying him. Shaikh's advocates say he suffered from a bipolar disorder and that he was tricked into carrying heroin into China with promises of a career as a pop singer.

what part of this did you not understand?
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
I have it from good sources that he was drowned in a vat of wonton soup.

Talk about fast.

Good on ya, Chinese govt.

:cool: As far as being mentally ill, wouldn't you have to be, to attempt to smuggle drugs into China...........?

........now he's cured.

good stuff.:mrgreen:
 

JakeElwood

~ Blues Brother ~
Nov 27, 2009
275
3
18
3,963 miles from Chicago
So Shaikh's family knew he was mentally ill and could be easily duped by criminals. If they didn't want him to get into any trouble, why did they allow him access to his passport and why let him travel overseas alone?
-------------------------------
And once again our Government ignores the minor detail - when a UK citizen breaks a law in a foreign country, they receive the punishments of that foreign country and not the soft sentences handed out to criminals in the UK.