Nothing like dragging out an old King James version with it's old english translation. How about using the entire quote from James in a more modern translation. But then, if you did that it would put lie to what you are inferring about Catholics and the Holy See.
JV - Jam 2:9 - But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
NKJV - Jam 2:9 - but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
NLT - Jam 2:9 - But if you pay special attention to the rich, you are committing a sin, for you are guilty of breaking that law.
NIV - Jam 2:9 - But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers.
ESV - Jam 2:9 - But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
RVR - Jam 2:9 - pero si hacéis acepción de personas, cometéis pecado, y quedáis convictos por la ley como transgresores.
NASB - Jam 2:9 - But if you show partiality, you are committing sin {and} are convicted by the law as transgressors.
RSV - Jam 2:9 - But if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
ASV - Jam 2:9 - but if ye have respect of persons, ye commit sin, being convicted by the law as transgressors.
YNG - Jam 2:9 - and if ye accept persons, sin ye do work, being convicted by the law as transgressors;
DBY - Jam 2:9 - But if ye have respect of persons, ye commit sin, being convicted by the law as transgressors.
WEB - Jam 2:9 - But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
HNV - Jam 2:9 - But if you show partiality, you commit sin, being convicted by the law as transgressors.
VUL - Jam 2:9 - si autem personas accipitis peccatum operamini redarguti a lege quasi transgressores
TR - Jam 2:9 - εἰ δὲ προσωποληπτεῖτε, ἁμαρτίαν ἐργάζεσθε ἐλεγχόμενοι ὑπὸ τοῦ νόμου ὡς παραβάται
mGNT - Jam 2:9 - εἰ δὲ προσωπολημπτεῖτε ἁμαρτίαν ἐργάζεσθε ἐλεγχόμενοι ὑπὸ τοῦ νόμου ὡς παραβάται
Even this old English translation says the very same thing.
2:9 But if ye taken persones, ye worchen synne, and ben repreued of the lawe, as trespasseris.
If the Pope is from God then he has to be able to do the signs following. Skills all the Apostles had (and a few others that had been baptized with the Holy Spirit and are named someplace in the Holy Bible). Casting out devils is a gift of the Holy Spirit, letting the devils in is not something that Holy Spirit would allow, if it was divine at the moment there would 'sins' that needs fixing. God says marriage is a Holy union, the RCC says only in certain circumstances and tries to impose it's own 'version' that can be considered to be a 'twist' from the original meaning.
When John was put in prison Jesus began to preach from inside their houses or worship. If the Pope cannot get out and about to conduct daily (twice daily) masses personally then perhaps a younger person should handle that office.
This is not meant as an 'attack on the RCC' but if you are a divine Shepherd you should not fear death and therefore not need bullet-proof things. At least Bush was young enough to duck thrown shoes, the Pope wouldn't even see it coming, either time. Nor do I see the ones around his age as being very open to learning something new from the youngest generation of Priests. Argue with the top and you probably don't go very far other that the adopt the 'stop killing imagined enemies' doctrine.