Canadian Snowflake found......

[DaSleeper]

Yesterday our Alberta bureau chief, Sheila Gunn Reid, was hit in the face by an NDP thug, right on the steps of the Alberta Legislature. Here's Sheila's report:

Sheila had gone there to report on a left-wing “Women’s March.” It was basically an NDP rally against Donald Trump. So: the usual professional protesters from the left.​

Of course, the event was dominated by NDP men. One of them saw Sheila, and recognized her from The Rebel.​

He started arguing with her; then swearing at her; then he said he’d hit her — and then he did.​

All while Sheila’s camera was rolling. Here is the full unedited video
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1eb9vQ1vAk


http://www.therebel.media/shock_video_rebel_reporter_attacked_by_alberta_ndp_thug
​

 

[petros]

What a fine man standing up for women.

 

[Locutus]

heh

internet.

good luck mr. bews.

 

[Decapoda]

What a fine man standing up for women.

Yup...fighting for women's rights by punching them in the face.

These protestors are so hopelessly confused, it's sad to see such aimlessness.

 

[EagleSmack]

Liberals really hate women don't they. Most anyone who supports the NDP and supported Hillary is a mysoginist and a bigot.

 

[Nick Danger]

Something's a little fishy here, while he was speaking with Gunn Reid he was looking to the side of the camera, while the actual "punch" was aimed directly at the camera. I don't think she got hit in the face at all, it's just more of the grandstanding and BS that has become Gunn Reid's signature recipe.

 

[EagleSmack]

Defending a man who assaulted a woman... yes that's a liberal.

And after he hit the woman reporter another protester said that she provoked the man.... nice.

 

[Nick Danger]

Defending a man who assaulted a woman... yes that's a liberal.
And after he hit the woman reporter another protester said that she provoked the man.... nice.

Not one to let little things like facts and evidence get in the way of a good story, are you? You fit the profile of the average Rebel fan perfectly.

 

[EagleSmack]

Not one to let little things like facts and evidence get in the way of a good story, are you? You fit the profile of the average Rebel fan perfectly.

So the woman on camera saying "You provoked him." did not say "You provoked him."?

 

[Nick Danger]

I'm saying the alleged assault itself is in question. The video evidence is inconclusive, there is no indication of Ms. Gunn Reid's actual location when the camera was struck but it does seem to indicate that she was standing to the side of the camera. Given her track record to date her allegations that she was struck in the face are worth sh*t.

 

[EagleSmack]

Reporter : "Don't tell me to calm down, that guy just hit me in the face."

Protestor 1: "You deserve to be angry. You deserve to be angry. I am just trying to make sure nothing more happens."

Protestor 2: "You provoked him. You're part of the problem. You're part of the problem."

Go on defending men who assault women if you wish.

 

[TenPenny]

I'm saying the alleged assault itself is in question. The video evidence is inconclusive, there is no indication of Ms. Gunn Reid's actual location when the camera was struck but it does seem to indicate that she was standing to the side of the camera. Given her track record to date her allegations that she was struck in the face are worth sh*t.

You're making excuses. That's pathetic. Blame the victim, shame the victim.

 

[Jinentonix]

Awwww poor little snowflake. "Duh, I don't why I'm here but I don't like anyone who disagrees with me so I'm gonna punch something/someone, duhhhhhh."

Funny how these f*ckers have no problem with violence, bullying and destruction of property when they don't get their way yet demand everybody else not only respects their opinion, but to treat it as gospel truth.

Who says atheists and humanists aren't religious? :lol:

 

[Hoof Hearted]

The woman who got cuffed is working to put food on the table. The protester is probably on welfare. The entitled Left strikes again!

 

[DaSleeper]

I'm saying the alleged assault itself is in question. The video evidence is inconclusive, there is no indication of Ms. Gunn Reid's actual location when the camera was struck but it does seem to indicate that she was standing to the side of the camera. Given her track record to date her allegations that she was struck in the face are worth sh*t.

Even if he only hit the camera, It's still assault!
And this not a big production with a cameraman on the side ...the reporters hold their own camera.....probably a shoulder mount.

 

[Decapoda]

I'm saying the alleged assault itself is in question. The video evidence is inconclusive, there is no indication of Ms. Gunn Reid's actual location when the camera was struck but it does seem to indicate that she was standing to the side of the camera. Given her track record to date her allegations that she was struck in the face are worth sh*t.

She was holding the camera. I'm sure the details will all get worked out in court.

Interesting though...one thing there is conclusive video evidence of is Canadian Press reporter Jason Fanson documenting and photographing the entire exchange and physical assault, yet no mention at all of this from the Canadian Press reporting. No wonder people are generally getting disgusted of mainstream media and there selective reporting of facts to fit a narrative and slant. Pathetic and sad.

 

[Nick Danger]

And this not a big production with a cameraman on the side ...the reporters hold their own camera.....probably a shoulder mount.

You're sure of that? I try to be open minded about stuff like this, but the "reporter" in question has a long and colourful history of twisting facts to suit her own agenda. Truth in journalism is a concept completely foreign to her. I'm not saying the assailant was right in what he did, but there are plenty of indications here that Ms. Gunn Reid is portraying the incident inaccurately to support a selfish and less-than-honourable agenda.

There are reports that another press agency has photos from a different angle. I would really like to see what the whole thing looked like from a different vantage point. I'm not given to make determinations based on political reasons, facts and evidence are much more reliable.

 

[EagleSmack]

Funny how these f*ckers have no problem with violence, bullying and destruction of property when they don't get their way yet demand everybody else not only respects their opinion, but to treat it as gospel truth.

They have no problem with violence whatsoever. Punching women, lighting them on fire... they'll do whatever it takes.

 

[Danbones]

you left out the murdering them with drones part

just sayin

 

[DaSleeper]

You're sure of that? I try to be open minded about stuff like this, but the "reporter" in question has a long and colourful history of twisting facts to suit her own agenda. Truth in journalism is a concept completely foreign to her. I'm not saying the assailant was right in what he did, but there are plenty of indications here that Ms. Gunn Reid is portraying the incident inaccurately to support a selfish and less-than-honourable agenda.

There are reports that another press agency has photos from a different angle. I would really like to see what the whole thing looked like from a different vantage point. I'm not given to make determinations based on political reasons, facts and evidence are much more reliable.

You will never see such a thing from "fake news"