British MP banned from entering Canada

OkiefromMuskoki

Nominee Member
Mar 18, 2009
80
3
8
Muskoka
EAO is correct. The record clearly shows that Hamas does NOT lie.

A fragmented leadership that does not speak with one voice may be in conflict occasionally and give different versions of policy but these are differences of opinion. Israel and Hamas also differ on the definition of "militants". The Hamas version is closer to the generally accepted version. With Israel, an 8 year old throwing a stone is a militant. Hamas does not try to pretend their "martyrs" are civilians. Hamas readily admits when it is them sending rockets into Israel. When they say a launch was unauthorized by them, it is likely true.

Hamas may be the devil incarnate but they are not liars.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
EAO is correct. The record clearly shows that Hamas does NOT lie.

A fragmented leadership that does not speak with one voice may be in conflict occasionally and give different versions of policy but these are differences of opinion. Israel and Hamas also differ on the definition of "militants". The Hamas version is closer to the generally accepted version. With Israel, an 8 year old throwing a stone is a militant. Hamas does not try to pretend their "martyrs" are civilians. Hamas readily admits when it is them sending rockets into Israel. When they say a launch was unauthorized by them, it is likely true.

Hamas may be the devil incarnate but they are not liars.

Is that an 8-year-old Israeli or Palestinian?

Soccer as a means, not a goal - Haaretz - Israel News

Maybe the kids should be in government office?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
If you tell lies, you run the risk of someone calling you a liar.

I agree. So give me an example of Hamas lying...

That's exactly what they are. I if I called a carrot a carrot would you call me a liar? A book is a book. No book is worth killing innocent people over. Not the bible, not the Qu'ran, no book at all.

How about books that say God gave Palestine to the Jews?

The use of violence is fine to defend yourself. But always in proportion to defend yourself and pointed only at those who put you in immediate danger of life and limb. It's not sucking some gullible fool into thinking that blowing themselves up to kill a few innocent people is some favor to God. That's moronic.

Then you definitely must not support what Israel does to Palestinians. You must be against the raid into Gaza on November 4, 2008 which broke the ceasefire, killed 6 members of Hamas and started the current round of violence. You must also be against Israel's sharp escalation of violence on December 27, 2008 which they justified in response to rockets attacks that hadn't killed anyone. BTW, among the hundred or so victims on the first day were about two dozen new police officers attending a graduation ceremony and a few children from the school next door.... in response to rocket attacks which hadn't killed anyone.

That works both ways you know. Anytime someone stops, they attack someone. The more I look at it the more I see there is no reasoning with them, no possibility to live in peace with them. If they all choose to be religious warriors, so be it. If they choose to take the battlefield into their homes and among their families, then so be it.

I assume you are aware that from the time Hamas agreed to the ceasefire back in June 2008 until Israel broke the ceasefire and attacked them on November 4, 2008 (the same day Americans elected Obama), they never fired a single rocket at Israel and arrested anyone who did. BTW, since they declared a ceasefire in January 2009, they stopped firing rockets and have arrested anyone who does:



30 March 2009

...Hamas, which controls Gaza, was carrying out arrests of members of smaller militant factions to stop attacks, and had signed an agreement with the Islamic Jihad group to end attacks....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7971512.stm


Really? I see it all the time. Some of the most deceitful people on Earth have been seemingly pious religious leaders. I see a lot of hypocrisy as well. Complaining loudly about people doing to them what they do to others. Then denying that they do anything at all.

That's true, but you'll have to provide some proof that this is the case regarding Hamas.

They want to continue a war with Israel regardless of their inability to win. They attack civilians, then hide among highly populated Palestinian areas and bark like dogs about attacks on Palestinian civilians that get hurt or killed when Israel hunts down and kills one of theirs. I don't think deceitful can be made clearer than that.

Hamas has repeatedly offered Israel truces, including some which would last for decades. What they want in exchange is a return to the 1967 borders and the ability to control their borders. The Hamas leader who offered this truce said they would leave leave it to the next generation of Palestinians to decide whether to go back to war, extend the truce or negotiate a formal peace agreement. He even got the other militant groups to agree. BTW, Israel assassinated that Hamas leader.

My Last Encounter with Ismail Abu Shanab - TIME

You're here talking about all the wonderful things that Hamas does. Getting people slaughtered no matter how much you say it's fighting for justice and defending themselves, is stupid and the epitome of injustice. Everyone knows that yet you keep claiming over and over again that it's virtue and righteousness on the part of Hamas. They're terrorists dude. You obviously know this. So you are a liar. That's just how it works.

Please back up your accusation with a quote, otherwise respect forum rules regarding personal attacks... What I have said is the Palestinians suffer injustice and oppression. I've backed that statement up with many references, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, B'Tselem, the Internation Committee of the Red Cross... and so on. I've quoted Jewish Israeli historians who have come to the same conclusion. No one on this forum has disproven this with references to better sources of information. Suffice to say I've proven that Palestinians suffer injustice and oppression for decades. Its been 60 years now and their suffering has been constant. During periods of calm or violence, Israel's treatment of these people has been consistent. Israel violently ethnically cleanses them from their land and then builds Jewish only colonies over the ruins of their farms, homes, businesses, cemetaries.... All I've ever said is that people who suffer injustice and oppression have a right, an obligation even, to fight for freedom and justice. You think this is stupid? You'll have to clarify that argument. I've never supported the use of violence to resolve disputes. Israeli apologists support the use of extreme disproportionate violence in response to even minor acts of defiance and resistance. How do you stand on that issue? How many Palestinians can Israel justify killing in response to rocket attacks which killed no one between June 2008 and December 27, 2008 and maybe killed 5 people in the previous decade? Would you consider several hundred innocent men, women and children disproportionate?

Yeah like someone will shoot a rocket at kids but they won't lie to get more money to supply themselves with more rockets. How can you be so blind? Unless you're simply spoiling for a fight.

Hamas has never lied about firing rockets at Israel. Most of the time their rockets land in an open field. Half the time they don't even make it out of Gaza. You believe they are targetting children??? No one claims those rockets are accurate enough to hit a city consistently, never mind aimed at specific children. But they do periodically cause civilian deaths and therefore they are war crimes. Perhaps you'd like to comment on Israel's deliberate use of White Phosphorus on civilian targets like schools full of innocent civilians taking shelter. White Phosphorus burns upon contact with skin and burns flesh to the bone. Here is a video of some Palestinian children being treated for WP wounds in an Egyptian hospital:

YouTube - Evidence of Israel using white phosphorus bombs in Gaza (The Gaurdian)

See what I mean.



Did you think that no one here could find what Galloway has to say on the Net? Seems to me like you just want to post this crap all over as a few others do.

Do you send money to Hamas to support them?

No I don't. But I do give money to OxFam, Doctors Without Borders and other NGOs. But no I don't support violence or what you call terrorism.

Do you send money to Israel? Did you vote for Harper? If so then you support what Israel does to Gaza and what I call terrorism.

Likely you are ignorant of what you support. Sooner or later it will become clear what it is you support. You owe it to yourself to watch these videos.

YouTube - Guardian investigation uncovers evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza Part 1

YouTube - Guardian investigation uncovers evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza Part 2

YouTube - Guardian investigation uncovers evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza Part 3

YouTube - Gaza's destruction revealed - 20 Jan 09

Then come back and tell me that Israel is an innocent victim of Palestinian terror.

The way I see it, Israel is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. For over 60 years now, they've practiced ethnic cleansing, illegal annexations, illegal colonization.... They've deliberately attacked civilians with conventional and chemical weapons.

But I don't support violence in response to violence.

M.K. Ghandi: An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

This is the type of resistance I support:
Bil'in - Discover Bil'in
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
OK I just got back from the "Resisting War from Gaza to Khandahar". It was unfortunate that Galloway was not able to deliver the speech in person. The video feed interfered with the message somewhat. Its like the difference between watching a concert live or watching it on TV.

I submitted my question, but he only had time to answer three questions. Mine wasn't one of them.

But he did talk to this point in a way. It was when he was talking about why he did not support Hamas and would not vote for Hamas. (Galloway has a Palestinian passport and technically can vote in the next Palestinian election) But he understood why Palestinians voted for Hamas, because they can be trusted and they aren't corrupt like Fatah. They don't live in expensive villas in Europe nor do they send their children abroad to study. I believe Hamas gave him their word they would use the money for humanitarian purposes.
Awesome! So freedom of speech wasn't hindered and your claims were false.

.

You are right about one thing, ignorance is no excuse. Let me illustrate what I mean by that...
Did he apply through the right channels?
 

elevennevele

Electoral Member
Mar 13, 2006
787
11
18
Canada
Yes, the only obstacle is this government under Harper.


globeandmail.com: PM failing Abdelrazik, opposition parties charge

Mr. Abdelrazik has lived in the Canadian embassy in Khartoum for nearly a year. He left Canada in 2003 to visit his ailing mother in Khartoum, was arrested (government documents suggest it was at the request of Canadian security agents) spent 19 months in prison where he says he was beaten and tortured before eventually being released after Sudan said it could no longer detain an innocent man at the behest of foreign governments.


Canada also rejected a Sudanese offer to fly Mr. Abdelrazik back to his family in Montreal on a Sudanese government flight.


Last year the government said he would be issued a travel document if he could find an airline willing to carry him. When he did, that requirement was changed to a fully paid ticket.


Last month, more than 160 Canadian raised funds to buy the ticket.

"Now that the ticket has been purchased, not by the government of Canada, but by Canadians, the government has changed its tune again," Mr. Dewar said. "I don't understand why the government is playing these games with one of our citizens."


.

The conditions of which this government said they would allow him back have been met. From all that we know now, there is no reason to leave this guy in limbo. If Harper can send his politicians to bring back a blond hair woman who was charged in Mexico then they can bring back this guy that our RCMP and CSIS regard in written statements as not being guilty of anything. Nor has the Sudanese government determined him to be guilty of anything.

Unless this government has some cultural bias in who they will eventually fight for, there is no excuse left.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
I simply find it difficult to believe the level of idiocy revealed on this thread.

For starters, Galloway is an attention hog, who practically crawled on his knees before Saddam Hussein in abject admiration, the most disturbing example of obsequiousness I have ever seen.........who happily supplies cash to a group that targets vcivilians practically exclusively, and who has admitted admiration for those killing our soldiers in Afghanistan.

Let me say it again.

Were this World War Two, you idiots would be trying to arrange a speaking tour for Lord Haw Haw. (google it)

Then we get this disgusting gush over Hamas...it boggles the mind! They are so honest, so forthright, such devout followers of the Koran! Undoubtedly they made assurances that the $45,000 Galloway gave them went for all good things!

RIGHT!

I think you will find the Koran also has some small restrictions on the murder of innocents, torture of fellow Muslims, throwing other Muslims off high buildings or shooting them through the knee caps.....all of which your darling Human Rights Watch accuses Hamas of.

Murder? Torture? Crippling blows? Well, yes, but they NEVER tell a FIB!

My God!

OMG!

It is unbelieveable....I am speechless! Almost.

Geezus.....why don't you guys all pack your bags and move out of Canada and into Gaza, so you can moon over your Hamas heroes?

You'd raise the average IQ in both places.

And all this BS COMPLETELY off-topic.....we have the right to deny entry to ANYONE not born here.........END OF DISCUSSION.

Geezus!

My rant for the day.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I simply find it difficult to believe the level of idiocy revealed on this thread.

For starters, Galloway is an attention hog, who practically crawled on his knees before Saddam Hussein in abject admiration, the most disturbing example of obsequiousness I have ever seen.........who happily supplies cash to a group that targets vcivilians practically exclusively, and who has admitted admiration for those killing our soldiers in Afghanistan.

Let me say it again.

Were this World War Two, you idiots would be trying to arrange a speaking tour for Lord Haw Haw. (google it)

Then we get this disgusting gush over Hamas...it boggles the mind! They are so honest, so forthright, such devout followers of the Koran! Undoubtedly they made assurances that the $45,000 Galloway gave them went for all good things!

RIGHT!

I think you will find the Koran also has some small restrictions on the murder of innocents, torture of fellow Muslims, throwing other Muslims off high buildings or shooting them through the knee caps.....all of which your darling Human Rights Watch accuses Hamas of.

Murder? Torture? Crippling blows? Well, yes, but they NEVER tell a FIB!

My God!

OMG!

It is unbelieveable....I am speechless! Almost.

Geezus.....why don't you guys all pack your bags and move out of Canada and into Gaza, so you can moon over your Hamas heroes?

You'd raise the average IQ in both places.

And all this BS COMPLETELY off-topic.....we have the right to deny entry to ANYONE not born here.........END OF DISCUSSION.

Geezus!

My rant for the day.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
Your sooooo right Colpy.. I am so glad he did not set foot in our country also..

The Video link from New York for the Video Conference really did nothing to promote from the 50 to 100 people ( original attendence ) to over 1,000 or even more looking him up on YouTube and such in Canada for the next engagements.

Such a great way to keep him out of the spot light and not bring attention to his cause... Great job..

So who do we pick on next and decide to ban ? We can't just stop now that we are on a roll.. Let's keep adding people to the list so we can keep everyone we don't like.. And when we change political parties in power we can change people we don't want in Canada as well. Great idea..

Can you hear the sarcasm.. :roll:

He's got a long way to go before he'll reach Two Girls And A Cup numbers.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Such a great way to keep him out of the spot light and not bring attention to his cause... Great job..

What part of "this is not a free speech issue" do you people find so hard to grasp? I have no problem if attention is brought to his cause. The more light shone on it the better. That, however has nothing to do with the laws of this country. I'm not entirely sure if you guys really are that stupid, that this must be repeated over and over again so you can grasp it or whether you just pretending to be stupid so you can continue to yak about your silly political ideas. One thing I can say for sure, if you aren't stupid, you do put on a good act.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDNBear

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
What part of "this is not a free speech issue" do you people find so hard to grasp? I have no problem if attention is brought to his cause. The more light shone on it the better. That, however has nothing to do with the laws of this country. I'm not entirely sure if you guys really are that stupid, that this must be repeated over and over again so you can grasp it or whether you just pretending to be stupid so you can continue to yak about your silly political ideas. One thing I can say for sure, if you aren't stupid, you do put on a good act.

Oh oh....that's it....you've now hurt his itty bitty feelings with that....betcha he puts ya on ignore now....ya big meany.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
Is it just me or does it look like Galloway is going to start eating the camera?:-? The reason I ask is that in each subsequent video clip his head gets closer to the camera and his mouth gets wider and wider!8O
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Is it just me or does it look like Galloway is going to start eating the camera?:-? The reason I ask is that in each subsequent video clip his head gets closer to the camera and his mouth gets wider and wider!8O


I didn't even bother looking at it.....saw enough of galloways bullshyte over the last two weeks
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
I didn't even bother looking at it.....saw enough of galloways bullshyte over the last two weeks

I'm not even talking about the videos themselves. I am talking about the Youtube pictures embedded in this page of the thread itself. Check it out. You'll see what I am talking about.;-)
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I guess he's just an "in your face" kinda guy..... doesn't have much else to offer.