Breaking :: The FCC Just Killed Net Neutrality

[taxslave]

Wouldn't it be even more preferable if nobody had control over what you see?

That it would but lefty's want to control the population. With corporate control it simply means you might have to pay a bit more for certain things while government control generally means some bureaucrat simply says NO you can not see that because I don't want you to.

 

[Corduroy]

That it would

Then let's have that.

I don't see why we have a binary choice between corporations controlling what you see and the government controlling it. Surely another option is possible.

 

[taxslave]

Then let's have that.

I don't see why we have a binary choice between corporations controlling what you see and the government controlling it. Surely another option is possible.

DO you want everyone to access to kiddy porn? Because that is what no controls means.

 

[Danbones]

The harder it is to get child porn the more money the perves will pay for it.
SOP for anything illegal

I think Kim.com has the right idea:
A block chain internet that has NO government or corporate control

You control your end if you need to.

 

[Corduroy]

Wouldn't it be even more preferable if nobody had control over what you see?

That it would

DO you want everyone to access to kiddy porn? Because that is what no controls means.

I don't think that's what no controls mean, but apparently you did because you just said it. You also agreed when it said no control would be preferable, so.... that means you want everyone to access child pornography?

I doubt that's true. You made a mistake somewhere.

 

[Walter]

I don't think that's what no controls mean, but apparently you did because you just said it. You also agreed when it said no control would be preferable, so.... that means you want everyone to access child pornography?

I doubt that's true. You made a mistake somewhere.

Kiddie porn is illegal no matter who controls the internet.

 

[B00Mer]

Kiddie porn is illegal no matter who controls the internet.

In certain countries it is illegal to view, but as usual you’re talking through your ass..

Notice how many European countries allow it?!

Many servers use IP rouses to hide their location, and there are hackers paid well to find the servers and shut them down. Extremely well..

 

[Cliffy]

Killing Net Neutrality Has Brought On a New Call for Public Broadband

Seattle’s Socialist Alternative Council Member Kshama Sawant — the prime mover of the city’s successful bid to enact a $15 an hour minimum wage — has another idea. She wants her city to simply build its own broadband network to compete with the private providers, guaranteeing a free flow of unthrottled information.
It may sound radical but it’s not unheard of. Today, around 185 communities in the United States offer some form of public broadband service. Because these services are controlled by public entities, they are also accountable to the public — a perk that anybody who has tried to get a broadband company on the phone can appreciate. (In November, residents of Fort Collins, Colorado, rejected an industry fear-mongering attempt and voted to authorize the creation of a citywide broadband network.)


http://theintercept.com/2017/12/15/fcc-net-neutrality-public-broadband-seattle/

 

[HarperCons]

DO you want everyone to access to kiddy porn? Because that is what no controls means.

is this how the stupid ****ing backwards mongoloids are defending killing net neutrality now?

backwards brain clown whines about government control all day, and yet defend the destruction of net neutrality. explain that one.

 

[Corduroy]

Kiddie porn is illegal no matter who controls the internet.

I think you meant to quote taxslave on that. He's the one who implied that no control of the internet would mean anyone could access child pornography.

Although... I'm not sure what he meant because it clearly contradicts his previous statement. We'll have to wait for him to clear it up.

 

[Walter]

is this how the stupid ****ing backwards mongoloids are defending killing net neutrality now?

backwards brain clown whines about government control all day, and yet defend the destruction of net neutrality. explain that one.

Totally incoherent. How is giving the net back to the free market going to kill it. It’s the Free market that took the tiny thing created by the US military (sorry Al) and made it into the biggest communication device the world has ever seen.

 

[TenPenny]

Totally incoherent. How is giving the net back to the free market going to kill it. It’s the Free market that took the tiny thing created by the US military (sorry Al) and made it into the biggest communication device the world has ever seen.

So you agree that Google should be able to sensor conservative videos.

 

[Dixie Cup]

Hopefully the law suits will be successful.

 

[taxslave]

I don't think that's what no controls mean, but apparently you did because you just said it. You also agreed when it said no control would be preferable, so.... that means you want everyone to access child pornography?

I doubt that's true. You made a mistake somewhere.

I was trying to make you think about your statement but that appears to be too difficult for you. No controls means that kiddie porn and everything that is on the black web is available for everyone to accessing if they chose to. WHich is what you asked for. Are you sure that is what you want? I favor no controls for several reasons.
1 controlling access is not curing the problem of things like kiddie porn, it just forces it underground.
2 controlling access , especially by governments will be patchwork at best with competing and overlapping thought police trying to push their agenda.
3 controls always make winners and losers based on politics. I would prefer that there be unlimited ISPs and you get the kind of access you pay for.

 

[Walter]

So you agree that Google should be able to sensor conservative videos.

What does sensor mean?

 

[Corduroy]

I was trying to make you think about your statement but that appears to be too difficult for you. No controls means that kiddie porn and everything that is on the black web is available for everyone to accessing if they chose to. WHich is what you asked for. Are you sure that is what you want? I favor no controls for several reasons.
1 controlling access is not curing the problem of things like kiddie porn, it just forces it underground.
2 controlling access , especially by governments will be patchwork at best with competing and overlapping thought police trying to push their agenda.
3 controls always make winners and losers based on politics. I would prefer that there be unlimited ISPs and you get the kind of access you pay for.

I get it. You were being condescending. Even though we agreed in your mind I couldn't have understood on your level, right? :roll:

On my part, I wrongly assumed you were contradicting yourself, which is common around here, but not something I'd expect from you, so I asked for clarification.

So putting all the tension aside, we agree. No government or corporate control of the internet is preferable.

 

[TenPenny]

What does sensor mean?

It means that the device providers have decided that they can determine what you want to write, instead of letting what you type exist as you write it.

 

[Walter]

It means that the device providers have decided that they can determine what you want to write, instead of letting what you type exist as you write it.

Not quite.

Definition of sensor

1 : a device that responds to a physical stimulus (such as heat, light, sound, pressure, magnetism, or a particular motion) and transmits a resulting impulse (as for measurement or operating a control)

So, it’s a noun not a verb. In post #81 it was used as a verb, hence my confusion as to its meaning. I believe the word wanted was censor. One letter can make all the difference between displaying intelligence or assholicity.

 

[TenPenny]

Not quite.

Definition of sensor

1 : a device that responds to a physical stimulus (such as heat, light, sound, pressure, magnetism, or a particular motion) and transmits a resulting impulse (as for measurement or operating a control)

So, it’s a noun not a verb. In post #81 it was used as a verb, hence my confusion as to its meaning. I believe the word wanted was censor. One letter can make all the difference between displaying intelligence or assholicity.

If that confused you, then I understand your political stance. It says all that needs to be said about your thinking abilities.

 

[Cliffy]

Here's a List of the Members of Congress Who Just Told Ajit Pai to Repeal Net Neutrality


And how much money they've taken from the telecom industry.

1. Mo Brooks, Alabama, $26,000
2. Ron Estes, Kansas, $13,807
3. Thomas Massie, Kentucky, $25,000
4. Ralph Norman, South Carolina, $15,050
5. John Moolenaar, Michigan, $25,000
6. Neal Dunn, Florida, $18,500
7. Mike Bishop, Michigan, $68,250
8. Alex Mooney, West Virginia, $17,750
9. Glenn “GT” Thompson, Pennsylvania, $70,500
10. Blaine Luetkemeyer, Missouri, $105,000
11. Paul Gosar, Arizona, $12,250
12. Richard W. Allen, Georgia, $24,250
13. Kevin Cramer, North Dakota, $168,500
14. Greg Walden, Oregon, $1,605,986
15. Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee, $600,999
16. Billy Long, Missouri, $221,500
17. Gregg Harper, Mississippi, $245,200
18. Brett Guthrie, Kentucky, $398,500
19. Bill Johnson, Ohio, $196,666
20. Jeff Duncan, South Carolina, $41,830
21. Earl “Buddy” Carter, Georgia, $39,250
22. Susan Brooks, Indiana, $168,500
23. Gus Bilirakis, Florida, $234,400
24. Markwayne Mullin, Oklahoma, $141,750
25. Mimi Walters, California, $161,500
26. Joe Barton, Texas, $1,262,757
27. Bill Flores, Texas, $127,500
28. Pete Olson, Texas, $220,500
29. Morgan Griffith, Virginia, $198,900
30. Tim Walberg, Michigan, $131,850
31. Fred Upton, Michigan, $1,590,125
32. Joe Wilson, South Carolina, $104,750
33. Martha McSally, Arizona, $84,936
34. Blake Farenthold, Texas, $64,250
35. Steve Womack, Arkansas, $104,750
36. Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, $130,700
37. Louie Gohmert, Texas, $85,055
38. Walter Jones, North Carolina, $72,800
39. Leonard Lance, New Jersey, $290,550
40. Steve Chabot, Ohio, $332,083
41. Bob Goodlatte, Virginia, $815,099
42. Andy Biggs, Arizona, $19,500
43. Mark Walker, North Carolina, $35,750
44. Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin, $21,200
45. Ken Buck, Colorado, $79,350
46. Larry Bucshon, Indiana, $71,750
47. Chuck Fleischmann, Tennessee, $42,00
48. David Rouzer, North Carolina, $34,300
49. Paul Mitchell, Michigan, $18,000
50. Hal Rogers, Kentucky, $360,450
51. Doug Collins, Georgia, $103,600
52. Ralph Abraham, Louisiana, $27,300
53. Mark Meadows, North Carolina, $14,500
54. Michael McCaul, Texas, $216,500
55. Jeb Hensarling, Texas, $270,198
56. Mike Simpson, Idaho, $125,200
57. Tom Emmer, Minnesota, $28,500
58. Randy Weber, Texas, $13,750
59. Rob Woodall, Georgia, $60,250
60. Ted Budd, North Carolina, $15,500
61. Ken Calvert, California, $219,212
62. Diane Black, Tennessee, $104,750
63. Virginia Foxx, North Carolina, $115,700
64. Sam Johnson, Texas, $219,785
65. James Comer, Kentucky, $22,750
66. Trey Gowdy, South Carolina, $83,250
67. Lamar Smith, Texas, $810,462
68. Steven A King, Iowa, $210,810
69. George Holding, North Carolina, $97,750
70. Rob Wittman, Virginia, $57,250
71. John Lee Ratcliffe, Texas, $53,950
72. Jason Lewis, Minnesota, $21,050
73. Jim Banks, Indiana, $16,303
74. Bill Huizenga, Michigan, $34,000
75. Bill Shuster, Pennsylvania, $202,500
76. Steven Russell, Oklahoma, $23,500
77. Adrian Smith, Nebraska, $165,834
78. Jody B Hice, Georgia, $21,000
79. Richard Hudson, North Carolina, $136,750
80. Douglas L Lamborn, Colorado, $110,543
81. Chris Collins, New York, $151,060
82. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers, Washington, $673,530
83. Brad Wenstrup, Ohio, $33,750
84. Andy Barr, Kentucky, $51,100

Rebecca Flowers contributed to this report.

http://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...-congress-fcc-letter?utm_campaign=sharebutton