Then I stand corrected. He didn't cross state lines with the gun.
A 19-year-old Kenosha man has been charged with giving Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, the rifle he used to kill two people during August unrest in Kenoshawww.usatoday.com
He still had the gun illegally.
In the end, it'll be up to the court to decide if he is guilty or not. My point originally was that he had a 2 million dollar bail and guess who paid to get him out?! Right Wing Trump supporters who are also helping fund his defence.
So again, crying "Oh the Dems are getting BLM people out!" when he's gotten the same is hypocrisy on your part.
I'm... sorry, did you just ask an obviously stupid question?
1) the shooting itself wasn't racist. Whether self defence or a murder, we don't know that yet.
2) just because he didn't shoot any black/brown/asian/purple people doesn't mean he's NOT a little racist shit. Hanging out with Proud Boys, being their little "Buddy" and flashing White Supremecy symbols (if you believe it's the A-OK sign you will believe anything) DOES however heavily push him to be racist.
Ergo, 3) he can be BOTH.
Yep. The courts will decide. But it appears to me to be such an obvious case of self defense that the prosecution of this guy is ridiculous.
As for the minor gun laws, which, btw, are unconstitutional, (IMHO) I couldn't care less. Thank God Rittenhouse had a weapon, or he would have been seriously injured or worse.
BTW, do you know why he was attacked? He got a fire extinquisher and put out a dumpster fire lit by the protestors. They took exception to that.
Oh, and you're accusation of "racist" is simply typical lefty BS. It makes you look ridiculous. Rittenhouse did NOTHING to indicate he was racist. Nothing.
Oh, and the last leader of the Proud Boys? A BLACK Cuban. Some bunch of white supremacists. The Proud Boys might be a lot of things, (stupid, looking for trouble, mad-ass idiot Trump supporters) but obviously racist is not one of them.