So, bigmouth, what did I say that wasn't plausible? That I disagreed with your assessment that 100% of this thread is theory?See above.
So, bigmouth, what did I say that wasn't plausible? That I disagreed with your assessment that 100% of this thread is theory?See above.
Then perhaps ALL the data should be turned over to a public consortium for one final hooray to put an end to it all?But there are certain inalienable facts about steel, the speed in which things fall etc. That nullify some extraordinary claims by the C/T crowd.
Define plausible. Plausible is not proven it is the outcome of a theory. Word use once again.So, bigmouth, what did I say that wasn't plausible? That I disagreed with your assessment that 100% of this thread is theory?
Sure, but didn't we already do that...NIST. A public organization, fully transparent.Then perhaps ALL the data should be turned over to a public consortium for one final hooray to put an end to it all?
I'm game to a broader public expose though.I'd really love to see that happen.
I have no idea what you are babbling about. All I did was disagree that 100% of this thread is theory. Some of it is simply hypotheses and some of that isn't even reasonable. So only a fraction of this thread is theory. Learn to comprehend what you read, will you. You might like to add appropriate punctuation so the rest of us can more easily understand what you are trying to say, too.Define plausible. Plausible is not proven it is the outcome of a theory. Word use once again.
There were two versions that came out of NIST. The team that found opposing results was sacked. Lots of opposing scientist were sacked in lots of institutions. Check into it if you like.Sure, but didn't we already do that...NIST. A public organization, fully transparent.
You just wanted to pick a fight. Go else where.I have no idea what you are babbling about. All I did was disagree that 100% of this thread is theory. Some of it is simply hypotheses and some of that isn't even reasonable. So only a fraction of this thread is theory. Learn to comprehend what you read, will you. You might like to add appropriate punctuation so the rest of us can more easily understand what you are trying to say, too.
A sad reality of military commerce.There were two versions that came out of NIST. The team that found opposing results was sacked. Lots of opposing scientist were sacked in lots of institutions. Check into it if you like.
When it came to marketing Iraq anything that got in the way was removed.
At a cost of social unrest and total distrust of govt.A sad reality of military commerce.
Stuff it. I am staying right here. And you are wrong, I have better things to do than pick a fight with the twin brother of Sir Pompass.You just wanted to pick a fight. Go else where.
I love this. There is no higher honour than controlling someone's emotions without even asking.Stuff it. I am staying right here. And you are wrong, I have better things to do than pick a fight with the twin brother of Sir Pompass.
I am glad you are having fun. Who says I was feeling anything, though?I love this. There is no higher honour than controlling someone's emotions without even asking.
If you were really indifferent, it wouldn't be amusing.Fun? Nah I'm indifferent that is what is so temporarily amusing.
Good. Then we've both been amused. lol And we've been trolling each other. lmaoWas amusing.
They didn't have any part in their constructtion that I know of, does your statement reflect thatHey they just built 30 new schools in US too. OMG will they blow up too!!!???
Try again, I don't buy silly unfounded accusations.