It was a science topic but it was used as a political lever to insult a political leaning...left.I am confused now. Is a science topic here or a lpolitical topic here?
It was a science topic but it was used as a political lever to insult a political leaning...left.I am confused now. Is a science topic here or a lpolitical topic here?
sorry, unfamiliar with the forum. When I see "left", I supposed a political thread here.
and it was clearly set up that way too...Do not be sorry you are right, all the threads are political.
You will have to explain the lefty stuff. Normally a group of scientists at a place like Stanford is called a bunch of lefties by the right. Then you can explain why the study is what a lefty hates.The lefties hate this kind of stuff. From Stanford no less.
There is NO clear link between passive smoking and lung cancer, scientists claim | Mail Online
why use Geographic insdead of directional?It's a direction. Move to your left, move to your right.
Oh I see. Thank you. But why those scientists are called lefty?You will have to explain the lefty stuff. Normally a group of scientists at a place like Stanford is called a bunch of lefties by the right. Then you can explain why the study is what a lefty hates.
Purely nonsensical injection of politics on your part.
why use Geographic insdead of directional?
Oh I see. Thank you. But why those scientists are called lefty?
It's based on the seating arrangement of the parties in the French Assembly in 1789. Communists and socialists were seated on the left side of the hall, nationalists, royalists, and proto-fascists on the right side.why use Geographic insdead of directional?
Because Wally calls anyone he doesn't like lefty. As far as he is concerned, the only thing in the world worse than a person on the political left is a non-white person on the political left.Oh I see. Thank you. But why those scientists are called lefty?
The military must be very confused politically: "Left, right, left, right, forward march..."It's based on the seating arrangement of the parties in the French Assembly in 1789. Communists and socialists were seated on the left side of the hall, nationalists, royalists, and proto-fascists on the right side.
Because Wally calls anyone he doesn't like lefty. As far as he is concerned, the only thing in the world worse than a person on the political left is a non-white person on the political left.
Thanks for the reddy, Wally. Guess I kinda hit home, huh?
"Speaking truth to powerless," that's my motto.
I am as well, my writing with my right is horrible.
Ever try finding a pair of left handed scissors. Not easy.
The military must be very confused politically: "Left, right, left, right, forward march..."
Actually, the cadence count is "left, left, left-right-left." Until I got to boot camp, I always thought that was three hops followed by two steps.The military must be very confused politically: "Left, right, left, right, forward march..."
Actually, the cadence count is "left, left, left-right-left." Until I got to boot camp, I always thought that was three hops followed by two steps.
Turns out it wasn't nearly that funny.
Matters not what I think.
That said, cancer is not the only disease associated with exposure to the smoke from cigarettes, and there is clear evidence of this. For children who 'passively smoke', there are documented and robust findings of increased risk for developing asthma, for contracting lung infections, for impaired growth, reduced pulmonary and breathing function, and many many more.
Actually, the cadence count is "left, left, left-right-left.".....
The military must be very confused politically: "Left, right, left, right, forward march..."
Point of order. From the study at the journal's website:
Therefore, it's incorrect to state no clear link between second hand smoke and cancer. The risk appears to be small, and dependent on the exposure, obviously. Though from home the study is behind a paywall, so it's not really possible to look with a critical eye into the methods used.
That said, cancer is not the only disease associated with exposure to the smoke from cigarettes, and there is clear evidence of this. For children who 'passively smoke', there are documented and robust findings of increased risk for developing asthma, for contracting lung infections, for impaired growth, reduced pulmonary and breathing function, and many many more.
It's far more difficult to study the effects in adults, who have confounding exposures to many other risk factors of respiratory disease. Walter, as someone who makes a living at this, it behoves me to inform you that one study is rarely the definitive answer.
I was trying to be clear. For us it was actually more like "Eh, eh, eh eye eh."In our boot camp it was "eft, eft, eft ite eft". Don't know why exactly....