Try reading this thread again. If you still don't understand, PM me and I'll explain it to you.
You explain something... lol.. that's funny.
No thanks, I don't need to hear a bunch of rationalizations :roll:
Try reading this thread again. If you still don't understand, PM me and I'll explain it to you.
From a legal perspective yes. Not from a psychological perspective.
Yes I do. Gibberish has always caused me problems
The jurisdiction's determination is all that matters. The only problem is the failure to enforce the law with greater retribution.
It can be treated but not cured, one form of treatment is amputation just above the shoulder.
This strikes me as wasteful, and while understandable as an emotional gut reaction, only will lead to more children being harmed.
First off I think we can agree there is something wrong in a paedophiles brain and physiology. This isn't like getting drunk and hitting someone with a car where you are stupid and careless, a paedophile is physically different.
They can get physically aroused by children, thats not normal and not even physically possible for adults who are normal.
Therfore, something is physically wired wrong. To say they cannot be cured is also bunk, they cannot be cured now. I don't know of any other ailment where we go "Hey, there is no cure here..lets never look for one".
Im not saying let them roam free. Im saying we need to do research into fixing this, heavy reasearch. Then we can cure people before children are harmed rather than punishing them after the fact and still having children who are now scarred for life.
Im aware this may require actually cracking open someones skull and performing microsurgery, or gene therapy to change their hormone production. Im well aware this is a decidely slippery slope.
Where have I heard recently, that a society can be measured by how it treats the lowest of its members? It seems to me that things like this would necessitate going beyond slippery slope, to downright experimenting on prisoners and those we've deemed unfit members of society.
I think both you and Zarzchov make valid points. I agree that vigilantism is probably not the best solution, but until we can cure them they have to be kept in a secure location that the public can have faith that their child is safe, and so far the system seems incapable of doing that. Maybe it's time the prison system was turned over to the private sector. I know I could build a bunker from which they couldn't escape.