I dare anyone to refute the fact that I have gone over Niagara Falls 14x and lived, it is a fact because I say it is, disagree and will bring down the law on ya'll.
An Apology
- Thread starter Cannuck
- Start date
DS, did you notice the play in the steering wheel? I told you, that shuttle doesn't feel right. I reported the problem when I flew it to Saturn.
That's your excuse....
No excuses, NO FEAR! :smile::smile::smile::smile::smile:
That is him, indeed. His cleft pallet is a distinguishing feature in my opinion. I want to clarify that his 'suspected" cleft pallet only exists on the internet, therefore I am not liable to the star trek fleet or any other quasi-space kangaroo courts for any slanderous statements in the above paragraph.
You must have flown the old hydraulic system...now it's "fly by wire" and they replaced the wheel with a stick
I agree with the first two scenarios, as for the third I was almost certain that in Canada you couldn't collect monies for defamation of character. I'll take your word for it 'cause I'm too lazy to look it up.:smile:
Oh, blow it out your ear, Porter. I FEEL you are just a narcissistic twit craving attention at any cost. Were I the owner of this site, and since you have attempted to escalate your controlling way with threats of legal action - no matter how idle the threat - I would ask you to take your trouble-making arse out the door.
I went golfing. I sucked btw....shot 6 over my handicap.
Have I just defamed myself??8O
Well you caught me. I actually shot 23 over. It was a magical night though. Tiger Woods showed up and we got to play a round with him. I figured I could get some pointers so, when I hit my tee shot, on two, out of bounds I said "Tiger, what's the problem. I always have this wicked slice". Tiger informed me, it was my loft. When I chipped 30 yards past the 5th green, I asked Tiger why I always seemed to top my wedge. He said, "It's your loft". On number 8, I was 15 feet from the pin and after I putted, I was 22 feet away. I looked to Tiger for help with my putting but again he informed me that my problem was with my loft.
Finally I said, "Look Tiger, I realize you are the best golfer in the world but, come on....what's with the loft? He said "loft!!!"
Lack
Of
F#@king
Talent
Prima facie means that the argument sounds good on first being heard, that is to say, it probably won't be dismissed out of hand, that is to say it will pass the "snicker" test.
So evidence that is Prima facie is the kind that will be admissible and probably hold up.
For example a child covered in cookie crumbs that claims he hasn't been stealing cookies is not making an argument that is prima facie, it will also doubtlessly fail the snicker test.
I'm not sure what is meant by the quote in which the term is being used (in red). I suspect it is saying that so long as the insulting statement stays away from being libellous it could remain prima facie, that is to say, that there is a certain line which a comment can cross where it becomes libellous and whether it is true or not becomes irrelevant; i.e., as soon as a comment becomes libellous it is no longer prima facie. A good example would be calling someone a "fag," it might be true but so what? It isn't indicative of anything and thus if used to warrant a claim isn't prima facie.
Last edited:
This thread is just a riot... The notion that there is the potential for legal action that may result in monetary damages being awarded is remarkably naive and simplistic.
Regardless here's a wee hint for anyone that wants to roll the dice in the litigation-lottery.... Not only do you need to provide real and tangible evidence of financial loss to justify a fiscal remedy, a very real opportunity exists that the court (and/or the defendant and their attny) will seek to to establish that the suit was vexatious/frivolous in which case the court can demand court charges and the defense can seek financial damages that relate to the defendant's legal costs.
One more thought for those folks threatening law suits: The courts do not adjudicate conflicts based on fictitious personalities.... Try if you like, but do be prepared to her the term vexatious and frivolous law suit and think about bringing your cheque book to court - it'll save you a second trip later.
Regardless here's a wee hint for anyone that wants to roll the dice in the litigation-lottery.... Not only do you need to provide real and tangible evidence of financial loss to justify a fiscal remedy, a very real opportunity exists that the court (and/or the defendant and their attny) will seek to to establish that the suit was vexatious/frivolous in which case the court can demand court charges and the defense can seek financial damages that relate to the defendant's legal costs.
One more thought for those folks threatening law suits: The courts do not adjudicate conflicts based on fictitious personalities.... Try if you like, but do be prepared to her the term vexatious and frivolous law suit and think about bringing your cheque book to court - it'll save you a second trip later.
My point was that whatever anyone else says is totally irrelevant. You label yourself by your own words. And, quite frankly, the label you have thus affixed to yourself is not as kind as the one Cannuck branded you with.
Your reaction to him was, in your own words, childish, puerile. Grow a pair and start acting like an adult.
And if I was the owner or mod and you came calling with that kind of threat you would be permanently gone from here forthwith.
