America at War

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
EagleSmack said:
I feel that Saddam Hussein and his thugs needed to be removed. He was a brutal dictator. I know we can't get rid of every one but he has thumbed his noses at the UN for years. He was no better than Hitler.

http://www.iraqitruthproject.com/

However, this invasion has been played off as GW's war and quest for imperialism.

So when I say I hope that we do not get involved in other UN Military ventures I mean it. I do not see many other countries attacking us. Sure we will most likely get hit again by terrorist, but I do not think countries in Africa, which is a tinder box, will attack us directly. I think and I hope we should sit the next few out.

Once we pull out of Iraq and Afganistan, and who knows when that will be, I think we should let these other countries who obviously know better than the US and are more worldly and compassionate to put their men and women in harms way. The US has been called many times and has a pretty good record in responding. We called on the UN to stand up to this thug who has killed 1.3 Million people and the UN made us as the aggressor.

So be it.

You want to talk about friends now? Oh, all the world hates the US, but we should still open our wallets and send troops when ever the UN says we should.

Again, I hope we have learned our lesson.

Saddam Was a monster no doubt. But he was contained. It was all planned to go after him anyways with or without UN approval. This is an illegal war and your president is now a bigger monster and a bigger threat to the whole world. As a matter of fat, he is psychomanic.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
"This is an illegal war and your president is now a bigger monster and a bigger threat to the whole world. As a matter of fat, he is psychomanic."

So this applies only the GWB, not the entire coalition?
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
What coalition? The few here and there that went along because they wanted to be members of EU or NATO or needed some of the cake and needed to kiss Bush's feet.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Re: RE: America at War

moghrabi said:
What do you know about my truth. Most members on this board and around the world and even in your own country share my feelings about the war. So I fail to understand why you are after me personally.

You do not speak for most Americans.
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
Re: RE: America at War

EagleSmack said:
moghrabi said:
What do you know about my truth. Most members on this board and around the world and even in your own country share my feelings about the war. So I fail to understand why you are after me personally.

You do not speak for most Americans.

neither do you and very soon neither your president.
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
I find that the truth is out there and experienced by those that live around it. Mog apparently has had see the repercussions of the activities and problems in the middle east. Nobody will be able to tell if it is exaggerated or not but when compared to many many other similar stories it is more than mere coincidence.

If you can sit on your butt and try to tell anyone what the truth is without seeing the worldly view and accept the good an the bad you really have no hope whatsoever.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Saddam Was a monster no doubt. But he was contained.

Ok... by that line of thinking the next time an African nation goes ballistic on each other the UN can say that the famine and massacres are contained to that one particular region. The next time the Balkans erupt we can say that it is contained to the Balkans. The war in Yugoslavia was an illegal war as it did not have UN approval. That place is chock full of Canadian troops. When will that occupation stop?

I think we could learn a lot from China... stay out of it... everything. Maybe we have been going about things the wrong way.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Re: RE: America at War

moghrabi said:
EagleSmack said:
moghrabi said:
What do you know about my truth. Most members on this board and around the world and even in your own country share my feelings about the war. So I fail to understand why you are after me personally.

You do not speak for most Americans.

neither do you and very soon neither your president.

Yet still you are trying to speak for Americans. Didn't the Democrats learn that from last year. They were already making reservations for Kerry's inaugural ball until the results came in.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Eaglesmack here is the problem with what you say, just my opinion of course. The reasons for going into Iraq, were not noble, as you seem to make out, as far as I can see. Now if on the other hand, I did see going into Iraq as noble than I would think differently. I believe that george bush went there because of oil. Bin laden, who is responsible for 911 does not live in Iraq. There is nothing worse than someone looking you staight in the eye and lying. Now is that american people? No, its the american government. I really do not know how your ever going to sell the noble idea.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I will never sell the noble idea to you folks. That is for sure. However I believe we went in for a noble cause. Not that war is a noble enterprise, I am not saying that. I also think that the war for oil is not the reason. If it is... where is the oil that GWB is supposed to have secured for ourselves? By the war for oil theory, we should be pumping that oil onto US Ships for $0. That has not happened. Even with the terrorist strikes on oil fields there are still plenty of secure fields that we could be filling our reserves and more. It is just not happening. We, you and I, are paying BIG at the pumps because OPEC still sets the price for oil. We have no say on what they do.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
You are equating oil with the gasoline that goes in your car, Eaglesmack. Control of oil is not that simple. It has been a major factor in geo-politics since WWI...not just for providing your domestic market, but for driving economies (Exxon makes money no matter where the oil is sold) and keeping it out of the hands of your enemies and competitors.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Re: RE: America at War

EagleSmack said:
I will never sell the noble idea to you folks. That is for sure. However I believe we went in for a noble cause. Not that war is a noble enterprise, I am not saying that. I also think that the war for oil is not the reason. If it is... where is the oil that GWB is supposed to have secured for ourselves? By the war for oil theory, we should be pumping that oil onto US Ships for $0. That has not happened. Even with the terrorist strikes on oil fields there are still plenty of secure fields that we could be filling our reserves and more. It is just not happening. We, you and I, are paying BIG at the pumps because OPEC still sets the price for oil. We have no say on what they do.


Wow. This is exactly the kind of spin/rhetoric /hostility/ and pathology that was so prevelant on the ...get this. "Belief" based politics board I just left. Sure had hoped I had left it behind....and entered a forum of rational discussion./debate.

Ok........ If you (Americans ) have this need to "SELL" an idea for an invasion , then you all are in serious trouble. If you feel you can invade another nation, make up a few lies to do it......you are in serious trouble. If you really "believe" that your intentions are "Noble"......and expect others to buy into the crap......you are in serious trouble.

If you believe that you (USers) don't want to rule/dominate the world even more than you do, in serious trouble .

If you really believe that Americans are world knowledgeable, culture savy, and not insular , while YOUR gov't goes about jerking the world around with ongoing aggressive tactics.....again, in serious trouble.

Yes, maybe you should be more like China. China may not have the gov't YOU APPROVE of (as if your approval matters) , but they are smart, and don't run around interfering in everyone elses business.

by serious trouble......I mean. You (and your ilk) are so full of your self to the point of being delusional. and have lost contact with any semblance of reality.

You see, I could care less what you and your insanity has to say about Canada. And maybe you could care less what we say about your gov't. There is one major difference between the two situations. The US is in everyone's face and that makes it everyone's business. So face the fact, there will be a lot of opinions about the US(G) ....and particularly now. These opinions and feelings are well JUSTIFIED.

Seems it is naive and arrogant to even use the word "noble" in describing the US actions. EVERYTHING the US does is based on self interest and self interest alone. If you think this invasion was for 'Noble" reasons.........you are only deluding yourself .

IF this had been open , transparent and made rational sense, from the onset......there would have been world support, bush would not have had to go around manipulating others to follow him into his FANATICAL CRUSADE, and there would be a general concensus that this was the "Right" thing to do. IF it has been a "noble" or "right" thing to do....... we would be discussing the progress being made, the world would be involved in the reconstruction as a collaberative effort etc. Reconstruction??? think HALLIBURTON.......think Cheney ( whether he has an official position there or not) Face it, the US-corporations (select ones) are making money out of this. The oil factor is a lot more complicated and cannot be translated into the cost now per person directly.

LIES are not "noble" And what you have is a decietful leader. and he cares not about who he lies to. He has no regard for international law.......unless it is in his favor. THis is how he operates. He makes up the rules as he goes along. He is a fanatic.

Now, tell, me , is there any wonder there is so much anger at the US now??? Does this anger not translate into terrorism. Anger is the basis for most terrorist activity. ( combine anger and religion and you have a time bomb. )
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Ocean, that was very well put....(you can't see it but I'm giving you a standing ovation for that!)
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Twila: thanks :)

( gosh, there are some excellent posters on here... and it is a joy to be part of this little community.)

(have a great day Twila!! )
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
I think Eagle needs to go read my latest post in Bilderberger news .Maybe it will open his eyes to who is really running the show :wink:
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Ocean Breeze said:
Wow. This is exactly the kind of spin/rhetoric /hostility/ and pathology that was so prevelant on the ...get this. "Belief" based politics board I just left. Sure had hoped I had left it behind....and entered a forum of rational discussion./debate.

by serious trouble......I mean. You (and your ilk) are so full of your self to the point of being delusional. and have lost contact with any semblance of reality.

You see, I could care less what you and your insanity has to say about Canada.

Brought some of it with you I see....


Ocean Breeze said:
Yes, maybe you should be more like China. China may not have the gov't YOU APPROVE of (as if your approval matters) , but they are smart, and don't run around interfering in everyone elses business."

So words like Tibet and Taiwan mean nothing to you? I suppose stealing technology from America is minding ones own business too? Oh and American approval is required if beloved China wishes to keep Favorite Nation Trading Status.

Welcome to the board.