Already polluted? Environmental toxins found in newborns' cord blood: report

Sparrow

Council Member
Nov 12, 2006
1,202
23
38
Quebec
CTVNews.ca Staff, June 26, 2013 1:15:00 PM
Canadian children may already be carrying environmental toxins in their bodies even before they are born, an environmental group says.
In a new report, Environmental Defence says it tested the umbilical cord blood of three babies born in Toronto and Hamilton and found evidence of 137 chemicals.
The chemicals included flame retardants, lead, PCBs, organochlorine pesticides and PFCs (perfluorochemicals), which are found in non-stick coatings.
The group says some of the chemicals have been banned for years, but were still found in the cord blood they tested, highlighting how long toxic chemicals can persist in our environment and bodies.
Some of the chemicals they found have been linked in some studies to health conditions such as cancer, and developmental and reproductive problems.
This is particularly worrisome, they say, because a fetus can absorb higher levels of toxic chemicals than adults in relation to their body size when they are growing so rapidly. As well, they say, their "detoxification mechanisms" are less developed than adults, meaning a fetus is not as efficient at flushing out chemicals.
The group says their findings suggest babies are exposed to chemicals in the womb because pollutants are so pervasive in our environment and our consumer products.
"Canadians should have the right to live in a clean, healthy environment. But our tests indicate that before birth, our bodies are already contaminated by hazardous chemicals, some of which have been banned for decades," write the authors of the report, entitled "Pre-Polluted: A Report on Toxic Substances in the Umbilical Cord Blood of Canadian Newborns."
Maggie MacDonald, the toxics program manager with Environmental Defence, says it's nearly impossible for expectant mothers to protect their children from toxic chemicals, because they are so pervasive in our environment.
"We want to tell mothers it's not their fault that their babies are being polluted with these toxic chemicals," she told CTV News Channel Tuesday.
MacDonald says consumers can play a role in reducing the prevalence of these chemicals, though, by not buying products that contain "chemicals of convenience," such as fabrics with stain repellents or non-stick cookware.
"That then influences industry to stop using these chemicals in their products," she said.
Already polluted? Environmental toxins found in newborns' cord blood: report


Here is another intereting report on this link "CC Marketplace chasing the cancer answer"


This thread may be in the wrong place but I believe the prolem is political because our government is not going after the food industry to remove the carcinogens from our food.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
CTVNews.ca Staff, June 26, 2013 1:15:00 PM
Canadian children may already be carrying environmental toxins in their bodies even before they are born, an environmental group says.
In a new report, Environmental Defence says it tested the umbilical cord blood of three babies born in Toronto and Hamilton and found evidence of 137 chemicals.
The chemicals included flame retardants, lead, PCBs, organochlorine pesticides and PFCs (perfluorochemicals), which are found in non-stick coatings.
The group says some of the chemicals have been banned for years, but were still found in the cord blood they tested, highlighting how long toxic chemicals can persist in our environment and bodies.
Some of the chemicals they found have been linked in some studies to health conditions such as cancer, and developmental and reproductive problems.
This is particularly worrisome, they say, because a fetus can absorb higher levels of toxic chemicals than adults in relation to their body size when they are growing so rapidly. As well, they say, their "detoxification mechanisms" are less developed than adults, meaning a fetus is not as efficient at flushing out chemicals.
The group says their findings suggest babies are exposed to chemicals in the womb because pollutants are so pervasive in our environment and our consumer products.
"Canadians should have the right to live in a clean, healthy environment. But our tests indicate that before birth, our bodies are already contaminated by hazardous chemicals, some of which have been banned for decades," write the authors of the report, entitled "Pre-Polluted: A Report on Toxic Substances in the Umbilical Cord Blood of Canadian Newborns."
Maggie MacDonald, the toxics program manager with Environmental Defence, says it's nearly impossible for expectant mothers to protect their children from toxic chemicals, because they are so pervasive in our environment.
"We want to tell mothers it's not their fault that their babies are being polluted with these toxic chemicals," she told CTV News Channel Tuesday.
MacDonald says consumers can play a role in reducing the prevalence of these chemicals, though, by not buying products that contain "chemicals of convenience," such as fabrics with stain repellents or non-stick cookware.
"That then influences industry to stop using these chemicals in their products," she said.
Already polluted? Environmental toxins found in newborns' cord blood: report


Here is another intereting report on this link "CC Marketplace chasing the cancer answer"


This thread may be in the wrong place but I believe the prolem is political because our government is not going after the food industry to remove the carcinogens from our food.

Sounds grim! How does it compare with cord blood of 50 years ago?
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Sounds grim! How does it compare with cord blood of 50 years ago?
50 years ago the baby would have had a much greater chance of dying while being born. It's terrible that people are living longer healthier lives.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
50 years ago the baby would have had a much greater chance of dying while being born. It's terrible that people are living longer healthier lives.

Yeah, well I guess so Walter. People today are generally not too productive during the last 10-20 years of their lives, don't contribute a hell of a lot, have a lot of weird ideas and cost productive society a lot of money just monitoring them. Maybe a time bomb should be installed at birth and on their 70th birthday............................BANG.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Be interesting to know how many of these chemicals are truly environmental and how many are from lifestyle choices such as smoking and eating burned BBQ food.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,843
92
48
Yeah, well I guess so Walter. People today are generally not too productive during the last 10-20 years of their lives, don't contribute a hell of a lot, have a lot of weird ideas and cost productive society a lot of money just monitoring them. Maybe a time bomb should be installed at birth and on their 70th birthday............................BANG.
You first.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,524
7,053
113
Washington DC
CTVNews.ca Staff, June 26, 2013 1:15:00 PM
Canadian children may already be carrying environmental toxins in their bodies even before they are born, an environmental group says.
In a new report, Environmental Defence says it tested the umbilical cord blood of three babies born in Toronto and Hamilton and found evidence of 137 chemicals.
Feti share their mothers' blood. They are exposed to everything their mothers are exposed to. What did Environmental Defence think a uterus was, a hazmat suit?
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Feti share their mothers' blood. They are exposed to everything their mothers are exposed to. What did Environmental Defence think a uterus was, a hazmat suit?

No, but they did not know previously how much a placenta was capable of filtering.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Like asbestos.

The trick with asbestos is knowing how to handle it, if it is just on the wall behind the stove, it can be there for years without doing harm (unless you decide to lick it). You don't saw or drill into the stuff!

If you breathe the dust in every day for 30 years you are going to get sick and likely die.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
The trick with asbestos is knowing how to handle it, if it is just on the wall behind the stove, it can be there for years without doing harm (unless you decide to lick it). You don't saw or drill into the stuff!

If you breathe the dust in every day for 30 years you are going to get sick and likely die.

I'm more than aware of how to deal with asbestos.

The point was that some of your pearls of wisdom make me laugh. :)
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
It would have been nice if they looked at more than three babies, and perhaps over a greater geographic area. It would be good to see how and if the levels differ between urban and rural, and how and if the suite of chemicals found in cord blood change.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
It would have been nice if they looked at more than three babies, and perhaps over a greater geographic area. It would be good to see how and if the levels differ between urban and rural, and how and if the suite of chemicals found in cord blood change.

I suspect the 'liquid gold' nature of cord blood might limit how much study they can and will do on it.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I suspect the 'liquid gold' nature of cord blood might limit how much study they can and will do on it.

Though, the vast majority of umbilical cords are thrown away, by a wide margin. Partly because Canada doesn't have a very good system for storing that precious resource. A national bank is a good idea, when you consider Canadian provinces import cord blood for treatments, at costs as high as $30,000 for one sample. While private companies exist in Canada that will store umbilical cord blood for 18 years at a cost of about $2500.

For long term studies, it would indeed be liquid gold.

...

While doing some research on this I've just found this:
MIREC Canada
Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (The MIREC Study) - Health Canada

Looks like someone is doing just that! A long-term study across a wider geographic region, 2000 moms and their infants! That will be far better data!