I didn't dismiss one but accept the other.
The I didn't comment on the second because I already dismissed the source because of bias. Didn't think I'd have to repeat myself for the reason why. Apparently you're too lazy to get that though.
This does not disprove your point at all? You say Vaccines don't work, but this says vaccines help, so... which is it?
Really?
Certain vitamins and supplements have long been promoted as having benefits for the immune system, which has led some to believe they may have similar effects on COVID-19 — and some do...
www.health.harvard.edu
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide, totaling 89.4 million cases and 1.9 million deaths globally as of January 9, 2021.2 As a result of high-quality science, several vaccines efficacious against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2...
jamanetwork.com
Yeah... your opinion doesn't match up actual health studies.
Depends on what you mean by high enough - for a total cure? It was never touted as a total cure; idiots just thought it meant cure.
Yep, 90%+ ISN'T high enough? Why, because there are STILL 10%+/- STILL not vaccinated. Which means the virus can mutate. Which means people can still catch it and die. People can still catch it period. 10% can STILL overwhelm a health zone... but "IF" one country could get more than 90%, that's even better than a base of 75%. The more jabbed, the safer.
People didn't expect 100% because again, PEOPLE are stupid and the problem. FFS a lot of places struggle to maintain the BARE MINIMUM.
Because of bullshit like you posted.
Except that one source.
Who said Vaccines still work and properly.
So... what's your issue then?