Abortion demonstration just doesn't sound right.

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
You don't need to be religious to think your better then normal people. you just need a big ego.
And not thinking your better then a fetus compared to us means you think your better then us.

You like digging a big hole for yourself? You were the one who brought up "holier" (religious). How does not thinking I'm better than a fetus equate to thinking I'm better than people? Maybe you should look for a Logic 3 course in your neighbourhood!


Yep, the depth of the man's wisdom is overwhelming. :lol::lol::lol:
 

Ariadne

Council Member
Aug 7, 2006
2,432
8
38
I only have 6 pages, it depends on your settings in the forum.

And indeed, if these people are fighting for a fetus to have a say in the matter & have rights for it to defend itself with..... why don't these fetusez speak up?

Oh that's right, because they can't..... because they don't have a friggin clue wtf is going on, where they are, or if they even exist...... they can't even tell you their favorite colour...... because they exist in a black abbyss in the womb.

Oh but they need rights given to them to protect them.... they need other people like some in here to voice what they assume a fetus would think or believe, without any sort of evidence or proof backing them up.

LOL. A heartbeat is the first sign of life, but that heartbeat could not sustain itself. Having life means being able to also sustain life. If it cannot be sustained, it is not a viable person. There does come a time when there has been too much fetal development so ... with the right to abortion, there includes the responsibility to terminate at an early stage of pregnancy. With today's rapid pregnancy test, women know rather instantly. Certainly they need a couple of days to sort it out, but then the decision should be made as abortions require a couple of weeks to schedule. Abortions should be done up until the 8th week, in my opinion, but after that there should be some restrictions. 12 weeks is pushing it, because all sorts of movement starts - and it's not just because it's growing. Anyway, lots to debate, but ... without a victim, there is no crime.

Nope we have only determined that most pro-life think they are holier then holy so they ride on there high horse to try to impose how much better they are on the rest of the planet.

So far thats all I've learned

In there head they think there better then normal people

Reminds me of religious fanatics trying to convert everyone to their way of thinking.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
How does not thinking I'm better than a fetus equate to thinking I'm better than people?
You have some low self-esteem issues??? I personally think I am much better than a blastocyst or embryo but if you believe an inert lump of cells is better than you go with it.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Well, I have news for you buddy, you'd be wrong on two counts, first not all of us are religious and second we don't think we are better than a fetus! So suck on that for awhile. :lol:

Yes, cuz that sounds soo much better :roll:

Sorry, but I am better & more intelligent then a fetus or two-celled organism..... if you want to say you're the same as an undeveloped fetus that hasn't even begun to have a functioning brain, all the power to you :lol:

And you don't have to be religious to act like you're "Holier then thou"

You like digging a big hole for yourself? You were the one who brought up "holier" (religious). How does not thinking I'm better than a fetus equate to thinking I'm better than people? Maybe you should look for a Logic 3 course in your neighbourhood!

Yep, the depth of the man's wisdom is overwhelming. :lol::lol::lol:

And you claiming you're the same as a turnip is better?

Because until a fetus is to the stage of being born, taking its first breath and finally becoming aware of itself and its surroundings, that's all it is.... a vegetable..... thus you're claiming you're the same.

Logic 3 course indeed. :roll:

LOL. A heartbeat is the first sign of life,

As mentioned before, "Life" is irrelevant because a strawberry is alive, an ant is alive, a tree is alive, blood cells are alive, fungus is alive..... yet we don't give them basic human rights simply because they're alive.

And just because it's made up of human DNA, doesn't mean it should automatically be given human rights either, because we'd have to give those same rights to our lungs, heart, kidney, hair follicle.... and until a fetus is born, that's all it amounts to.

The only reason why people want to give a fetus human rights and try to ban abortions, is simply because they placed emotional thinking to something they felt kick and think that makes it special.

My heart beats and can feel like a mild kick...... but I don't think of it as some special entity that should be given human rights, because I and everybody else is simply conditioned over their lifetimes to it being there and doing that.

It's a part of my body and a part of my survival, just as a fetus and reproduction is a part of my genes survival through reproduction, and until that fetus becomes a born, living & breathing human being, aware of itself and its surroundings, it doesn't amount to jack sh*t........ it's a cold heartless thing to say, but it's also the truth.

As mentioned before and as so many have avoided or simply can't refute..... there are certain requirements that must be made to warrant something being given basic human rights, and a fetus doesn't fit those requirements anymore then a lump of my sh*t in the toilet does.

Whatever special values you give a fetus beyond that is subjective emotional dribble.

but that heartbeat could not sustain itself. Having life means being able to also sustain life. If it cannot be sustained, it is not a viable person. There does come a time when there has been too much fetal development so ... with the right to abortion, there includes the responsibility to terminate at an early stage of pregnancy. With today's rapid pregnancy test, women know rather instantly. Certainly they need a couple of days to sort it out, but then the decision should be made as abortions require a couple of weeks to schedule. Abortions should be done up until the 8th week, in my opinion, but after that there should be some restrictions. 12 weeks is pushing it, because all sorts of movement starts - and it's not just because it's growing. Anyway, lots to debate, but ... without a victim, there is no crime.

Agreed, there should be certain limits to abortions and those limits are currently met with the current laws and regulations, thus the abortion debate no longer needs to be debated...... it's these pro-lifers whom just don't seem to get this and still think they have some sort of valid point to be made..... which they don't.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
You like digging a big hole for yourself? You were the one who brought up "holier" (religious). How does not thinking I'm better than a fetus equate to thinking I'm better than people? Maybe you should look for a Logic 3 course in your neighbourhood!



Yep, the depth of the man's wisdom is overwhelming. :lol::lol::lol:

Now your the only one left to convert. Lets see..........

First tell me why you so against abortions again?

Cause you think abortions are wrong?

Oh so do you think the government should impose that on the rest of the people that think its ok?
 

Ariadne

Council Member
Aug 7, 2006
2,432
8
38
Agreed, there should be certain limits to abortions and those limits are currently met with the current laws and regulations, thus the abortion debate no longer needs to be debated...... it's these pro-lifers whom just don't seem to get this and still think they have some sort of valid point to be made..... which they don't.

True. The issue has been debated, laws have been drafted taking all parties, including the unborn, into consideration and unless there is new information, there's no reason to make change.

note: when I say that the rights of the unborn have been taken into consideration, I mean that the cell division is terminated before there is life thus making it impossible to argue that a non-existent life has rights.
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Now your the only one left to convert. Lets see..........

First tell me why you so against abortions again?

Cause you think abortions are wrong?

Oh so do you think the government should impose that on the rest of the people that think its ok?

Where did I say that?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
True. The issue has been debated, laws have been drafted taking all parties, including the unborn, into consideration and unless there is new information, there's no reason to make change.

note: when I say that the rights of the unborn have been taken into consideration, I mean that the cell division is terminated before there is life thus making it impossible to argue that a non-existent life has rights.


At this point in time, Canada has no abortion laws. A woman can legally procure an abortion right up to the day before birth.

Where did I say that?


Forget it JLM, you're dealing with an idiot.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,775
12,596
113
Low Earth Orbit
To those who support abortion; take the time and learn the history on how and why abortions were legalized. Some freaks will cheer while others will have some time before they can pick their jaws up off the desk.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
To all, to the best of my abilities and unless the necessities come into affect. If you read the rest of the thread, you would already know that. I love the fact that you equated a human fetus to a random microbe.

You can always make a comparison between any two things as long as you define that the comparative feature is essentially the same. In this case, that feature is "life" or "living being" or "organism". There is nothing wrong with calling a paramecium, for instance, and a human fetus: organisms.

I would like to clarify then, with the pro-life crowd then - we need to define clear boundaries as to what kind of life is important and what is not.

Is all life sacred to the same degree? Human life? Animal life? Vegetation? etc..

I would argue that it can't be, but pro-lifers seems to argue that it is. In order to be consistent, we would have to treat animals and plants with the exact same sanctity of life that is granted to humans.

It's inconsistent then, to be the same person defending pro-life, and also proposing that animal slaughter is just fine or that bacteria can be expunged at will.

That's a pretty fatal chasm in logic.

In order to overcome that and remain consistent, you have to absolve yourself of all forms of speciesism. Not only is that impractical, but we just can't avoid it ourselves.
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
You can always make a comparison between any two things as long as you define that the comparative feature is essentially the same. In this case, that feature is "life" or "living being" or "organism". There is nothing wrong with calling a paramecium, for instance, and a human fetus: organisms.

I would like to clarify then, with the pro-life crowd then - we need to define clear boundaries as to what kind of life is important and what is not.

Is all life sacred to the same degree? Human life? Animal life? Vegetation? etc..

I would argue that it can't be, but pro-lifers seems to argue that it is. In order to be consistent, we would have to treat animals and plants with the exact same sanctity of life that is granted to humans.

It's inconsistent then, to be the same person defending pro-life, and also proposing that animal slaughter is just fine.

That's a pretty cataclysmic chasm in logic.

One thing I have a problem with is there are people who have been born and yet have no more cognizant ability (maybe less) than a fetus and yet we don't terminate them while we terminate a fetus who probably has far more potential.

Drop a sack of kittens down a well and then call the cops and see what happens.

More out of concern for pollution of the water! :lol:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,775
12,596
113
Low Earth Orbit
More out of concern for pollution of the water! :lol:

Criminal Code of Canada - Cruelty to Animals Bill

Section 446 of the federal Criminal Code prohibits anyone from wilfully causing animals to suffer from neglect, pain, or injury. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals or police officers investigate complaints of noncompliance.​
But it's legal to kill a baby just seconds before it is born.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
Drop a sack of kittens down a well and then call the cops and see what happens.

I wouldn't drop a sack of kittens down a well. The kittens would likely drown and suffer a relatively painful death.

One thing I have a problem with is there are people who have been born and yet have no more cognizant ability (maybe less) than a fetus and yet we don't terminate them while we terminate a fetus who probably has far more potential.

Regarding people who are already born, we're getting into bioethics territory, so I'll leave that for now.

But when it comes to the 'potential' of a human being, it's clear that there's tons of potential regardless if people get to abort or not. Even if the western world became an abortion haven, we will never be able abort to the degree that we are sacrificing any potential to the human race.

Each ejaculation produces 300 million sperm.

There is no loss of potential.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,775
12,596
113
Low Earth Orbit
I wouldn't drop a sack of kittens down a well. The kittens would likely drown and suffer a relatively painful death.
It's not painful to have forceps jabbed into your cerebral cortex while a doctor is trying to push you back into the womb so the abortion is legal as the birth hasn't been complete?

To me that is flat out murder.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
It's not painful to have forceps jabbed into your cerebral cortex while a doctor is trying to push you back into the womb so the abortion is legal as the birth hasn't been complete?

To me that is flat out murder.

I never said I agreed with late stage abortions.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I wouldn't drop a sack of kittens down a well. The kittens would likely drown and suffer a relatively painful death.



Regarding people who are already born, we're getting into bioethics territory, so I'll leave that for now.

But when it comes to the 'potential' of a human being, it's clear that there's tons of potential regardless if people get to abort or not. Even if the western world became an abortion haven, we will never be able abort to the degree that we are sacrificing any potential to the human race.

Each ejaculation produces 300 million sperm.

There is no loss of potential.

I think you are right in that there is no loss in the amount of potential but I think there is almost bound to be loss in the type of potential. How often does a Mozart or Thomas Edison show up?