Don't wanna answer the question, eh?... Might make you seem, uhhh, hypocritical?
LOl my word,I get a great kick out of how nick-pickie some people are.
I have looked at electric cars and it really doesn't work well in my situation. It means I would have to have so much stuff delivered,weekly, monthly by truck an electric car would cost more in polution than it saves. I live on a farm. Truck deliveries, for everything I get in my van every week, would put put up MY environmental footprint in the ridiculous zone. Oh and that vehicle is exceptionally great on gas.
Yesterday, 10 bags of salt for the water softener, 4 - 8 foot boards for repairing a barn problem, my weekly groceries, and before hand, a gym visit. I have carried bricks, bags of cement, furniture, garden & farm supplies. Oh and when it is not loaded with supplies, it can actually carries 8 people comfortably and fairly often as well. Oh those bags of salt are on the back deck awaiting enough energy to get down to the basement.
So, as I said an electric car is not exactly the epitome of energy saving for everyone, and in many cases ends up a poor choice for some. A thermo-pump combined with gas for when it gets too cold to work, good energy saving windows, and plenty of insulation in a farm house built before 1850, are better choices for me.
And how does your electric car work for you?
Never heard of preaching by example?
Most greennies believe in do as I tell you to do....not as I do........ergo.... Hypocrites...
I figure my example is pretty blooming good. In the 80's our swimming pool was solar heated by a combination of black plastic pipes on a hand tilted frame. Now the system is considerably more sophisticated. Now what is YOUR contribution to saving energy!!
By the way what has my energy consumption got to do with Alberta leaving Canada!! Oh I remember now, it is the policy of a few here avoid the actual subject to attack the person when they cannot find a decent rebuttal. How tiresome.
I'm all for it. Please, please take our million newcomers per decade! They clump together into huge ghettos and it is really unhealthy to Canadian culture! I can't imagine that there is any policy determining where newcomers are to settle. They go where they want to which, for the most part, is where others like them have settled. The West definitely needs more, ... many more.
As far as moving the Capital, Ottawa is our fourth capital after Newark (now Niagara-on-the-lake) York (now Toronto) Kingston (now Kingston) then Ottawa. It was strategically relevant at the time to put it there but that significance has blown away with history.The location of the Capital is not carved in stone and, indeed, it can be moved West. Quebecers might not be to happy as Ottawa strattles the Quebec border and the bilingualism requirements to working in the Federal Civil Service means that a hell of a lot of Quebecers are employed there(and the buggers commute home to Hull every evening)
If it helps national unity, move the national capital to Selkirk and send 100,000 Pakistanis a year to Airdrie.
hmmm.......Yes, unfortunately, Quebec lost 600,000 people more than they gained over the past decades. Simply threatening to separate from Canada would probably reduce Alberta's population quite nicely. Too bad, so many businesses leave the province that threatens separation as well. Sending back all ex-Quebecers could solve both problems.